European and American perspectives on the meaning of natural
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Angyal, 1941, Disgust and related aversions, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36, 393, 10.1037/h0058254
Descola, 2005
Finucane, 2002, Mad cows, mad corn and mad communities: the role of socio-cultural factors in the perceived risk of genetically-modified food, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 61, 31, 10.1079/PNS2001127
Frewer, 1997, “Objection” mapping to determine group and individual concerns regarding genetic engineering, Agriculture and Human Values, 14, 67, 10.1023/A:1007331524432
Freidberg, 2009
Gaskell, 1999, Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S, Science, 285, 384, 10.1126/science.285.5426.384
Gaskell, 2004, GM foods and the misperception of risk perception, Risk Analysis, 24, 185, 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00421.x
Hohl, 2008, European public perceptions of food risk. Cross-national and methodological comparisons, Risk Analysis, 28, 311, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01021.x
Kellert, 1993, The biological basis for human values of nature, 42
Ohnuki-Tierney, 1993
Ronteltap, 2007, Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations. Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics, Appetite, 49, 1, 10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.002
Rozin, 2004
Rozin, 2005, The meaning of “natural”. Process more important than content, Psychological Science, 16, 652, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01589.x
Rozin, 2006, Naturalness judgments by lay Americans. Process dominates content in judgments of food or water acceptability and naturalness, Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 91, 10.1017/S1930297500002308
Rozin, 2009, Additivity dominance. Additivites are more potent and more often lexicalized across languages than are “subtractives”, Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 475, 10.1017/S1930297500004010
Rozin, 2000, Disgust, 637
Rozin, 2002, Free associations to food: The effects of gender, generation, and culture, Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 419, 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00002-8
Rozin, 1999, Attitudes to food and the role of food in life: Comparisons of Flemish Belgium, France, Japan and the United States, Appetite, 33, 163, 10.1006/appe.1999.0244
Rozin, 2004, Natural preference. Instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast between foods and medicines, Appetite, 43, 147, 10.1016/j.appet.2004.03.005
Shields-Argelès, 2004, Imagining the self and the other. Food and identity in France and the United States, Food, Culture and Society, 7, 14, 10.2752/155280104786577905
Sjoberg, 2000, Perceived risk and tampering with nature, Journal of Risk Research, 3, 367, 10.1080/13669870050132568
Stanziani, 2008, Defining ‘‘natural product” between public health and business, 17th to 21st centuries, Appetite, 51, 15, 10.1016/j.appet.2008.02.007
Thomas, 1983
Weber, 1958