Eu(III) and Am(III) adsorption on aluminum (hydr)oxide minerals: surface complexation modeling

Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Anshuman Satpathy1, Amy E. Hixon2
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractAmericium is a highly radioactive actinide element found in used nuclear fuel. Its adsorption on aluminum (hydr)oxide minerals is important to study for at least two reasons: (i) aluminum (hydr)oxide minerals are ubiquitous in the subsurface environment and (ii) bentonite clays, which are proposed engineered barriers for the geologic disposal of used nuclear fuel, have the same ≡AlOH sites as aluminum (hydr)oxide minerals. Surface complexation modeling is widely used to interpret the adsorption behavior of heavy metals on mineral surfaces. While americium sorption is understudied, multiple adsorption studies for europium, a chemical analog, are available. In this study we compiled data describing Eu(III) adsorption on three aluminum (hydr)oxide minerals—corundum (α-Al2O3), γ-alumina (γ-Al2O3) and gibbsite (γ-Al(OH)3)—and developed surface complexation models for Eu(III) adsorption on these minerals by employing diffuse double layer (DDL) and charge distribution multisite complexation (CD-MUSIC) electrostatic frameworks. We also developed surface complexation models for Am(III) adsorption on corundum (α-Al2O3) and γ-alumina (γ-Al2O3) by employing a limited number of Am(III) adsorption data sourced from literature. For corundum and γ-alumina, two different adsorbed Eu(III) species, one each for strong and weak sites, were found to be important regardless of which electrostatic framework was used. The formation constant of the weak site species was almost 10,000 times weaker than the formation constant for the corresponding strong site species. For gibbsite, two different adsorbed Eu(III) species formed on the single available site type and were important for the DDL model, whereas the best-fit CD-MUSIC model for Eu(III)-gibbsite system required only one Eu(III) surface species. The Am(III)-corundum model based on the CD-MUSIC framework had the same set of surface species as the Eu(III)-corundum model. However, the log K values of the surface reactions were different. The best-fit Am(III)-corundum model based on the DDL framework had only one site type. Both the CD-MUSIC and the DDL model developed for Am(III)-γ-alumina system only comprised of one site type and the formation constant of the corresponding surface species was ~ 500 times stronger and ~ 700 times weaker than the corresponding Eu(III) species on the weak and the strong sites, respectively. The CD-MUSIC model for corundum and both the DDL and the CD-MUSIC models for γ-alumina predicted the Am(III) adsorption data very well, whereas the DDL model for corundum overpredicted the Am(III) adsorption data. The root mean square of errors of the DDL and CD-MUSIC models developed in this study were smaller than those of two previously-published models describing Am(III)-γ-alumina system, indicating the better predictive capacity of our models. Overall, our results suggest that using Eu(III) as an analog for Am(III) is practical approach for predicting Am(III) adsorption onto well-characterized minerals. Graphical Abstract

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Fries T et al (2008) The Swiss concept for the disposal of spent fuel and vitrified HLW

Grambow B (2016) Geological disposal of radioactive waste in clay. Elements 12(4):239–245

Hedin A, Olsson O (2016) Crystalline rock as a repository for Swedish spent nuclear fuel. Elements 12(4):247–252

Oigawa H et al (2011) Role of ADS in the back-end of the fuel cycle strategies and associated design activities: the case of Japan. J Nucl Mater 415(3):229–236

Sellin P, Leupin OX (2013) The use of clay as an engineered barrier in radioactive-waste management—a review. Clays Clay Miner 61(6):477–498

Sevougian SD et al (2015) Enhanced performance assessment models for generic deep geologic repositories for high-level waste and spent nuclear fuel-16223. Sandia National Lab (SNL-NM), Albuquerque

Alexander JA et al (2019) Surface modification of low-cost bentonite adsorbents—a review. Part Sci Technol 37(5):538–549

Kumari N, Mohan C (2021) Basics of clay minerals and their characteristic properties. Clay Clay Miner 24:1–29

Davis J, Kent D (1990) Surface complexation modeling in aqueous geochemistry. In: Hochella MF, White AF (eds) Mineral-water interface geochemistry. Reviews in mineralogy. 23:177–260

Dzombak DA, Morel FM (1991) Surface complexation modeling: hydrous ferric oxide. Wiley, Hoboken

Hiemstra T, Van Riemsdijk WH (1996) A surface structural approach to ion adsorption: the charge distribution (CD) model. J Colloid Interface Sci 179(2):488–508

Stumm W, Hohl H, Dalang F (1976) Interaction of metal ions with hydrous oxide surfaces. Croat Chem Acta 48(4):491–504

Chang E et al (2020) Surface complexation model of rare earth element adsorption onto bacterial surfaces with lanthanide binding tags. Appl Geochem 112:104478

Koretsky C (2000) The significance of surface complexation reactions in hydrologic systems: a geochemist’s perspective. J Hydrol 230(3–4):127–171

Wang Z, Giammar DE (2013) Mass action expressions for bidentate adsorption in surface complexation modeling: theory and practice. Environ Sci Technol 47(9):3982–3996

Davis JA et al (2004) Approaches to surface complexation modeling of uranium (VI) adsorption on aquifer sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68(18):3621–3641

Westall J, Hohl H (1980) A comparison of electrostatic models for the oxide/solution interface. Adv Coll Interface Sci 12(4):265–294

Benjamin MM (2014) Water chemistry. Waveland Press, Long Grove

Lan J-H et al (2011) Trivalent actinide and lanthanide separations by tetradentate nitrogen ligands: a quantum chemistry study. Inorg Chem 50(19):9230–9237

Nash KL (1993) A review of the basic chemistry and recent developments in trivalent f-elements separations. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 11(4):729–768

Bompoti NM, Chrysochoou M, Machesky ML (2018) Assessment of modeling uncertainties using a multistart optimization tool for surface complexation equilibrium parameters (MUSE). ACS Earth Space Chem 3(4):473–483

Hiemstra T et al (2009) A surface structural model for ferrihydrite II: adsorption of uranyl and carbonate. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 73(15):4437–4451

Kobayashi Y, Fukushi K, Kosugi S (2019) A robust model for prediction of U (VI) adsorption onto ferrihydrite consistent with spectroscopic observations. Environ Sci Technol 54(4):2304–2313

Bompoti NM, Chrysochoou M, Machesky ML (2019) A unified surface complexation modeling approach for chromate adsorption on iron oxides. Environ Sci Technol 53(11):6352–6361

Satpathy A et al (2021) Intercomparison and refinement of surface complexation models for U (VI) adsorption onto goethite based on a metadata analysis. Environ Sci Technol 55(13):9352–9361

Kumar S, Godbole S, Tomar B (2013) Speciation of Am (III)/Eu (III) sorbed on γ-alumina: effect of metal ion concentration. Radiochim Acta 101(2):73–80

Morel J-P et al (2012) Effect of temperature on the sorption of europium on alumina: microcalorimetry and batch experiments. J Colloid Interface Sci 376(1):196–201

Rabung T et al (2000) Sorption of Am (III) and Eu (III) onto γ-alumina: experiment and modelling. Radiochim Acta 88(9–11):711–716

ThermoChimie Thermodynamic Database (2022) http://www.thermochimie-tdb.com/. Accessed 11 Oct 2022

Baumer T, Kay P, Hixon AE (2017) Comparison of europium and neptunium adsorption to aluminum (hydr) oxide minerals. Chem Geol 464:84–90

Kupcik T et al (2016) Macroscopic and spectroscopic investigations on Eu (III) and Cm (III) sorption onto bayerite (β-Al (OH) 3) and corundum (α-Al2O3). J Colloid Interface Sci 461:215–224

Norden M, Ephraim J, Allard B (1994) The influence of a fulvic acid on the adsorption of europium and strontium by alumina and quartz: effects of pH and ionic strength. Radiochim Acta 65(4):265–270

Allard B et al (1981) Sorption of actinides in well-defined oxidation states on geologic media. MRS Online Proc Libr (OPL) 11

Moulin V, Stammose D, Ouzounian G (1992) Actinide sorption at oxide-water interfaces: application to α alumina and amorphous silica. Appl Geochem 7:163–166

Righetto L et al (1991) Competitive actinide interactions in colloidal humic acid-mineral oxide systems. Environ Sci Technol 25(11):1913–1919

Righetto L et al (1988) Surface interactions of actinides with alumina colloids. Radiochim Acta 44(1):73–76

Janot N, Reiller PE, Benedetti MF (2013) Modelling Eu (III) speciation in a Eu (III)/PAHA/α-Al2O3 ternary system. Colloids Surf, A 435:9–15

Mayordomo N et al (2018) Selenium (IV) sorption onto γ-Al2O3: a consistent description of the surface speciation by spectroscopy and thermodynamic modeling. Environ Sci Technol 52(2):581–588

Weerasooriya R, Dharmasena B, Aluthpatabendi D (2000) Copper–gibbsite interactions: an application of 1-pK surface complexation model. Colloids Surf, A 170(1):65–77

Yang X et al (2007) Surface acid–base properties and hydration/dehydration mechanisms of aluminum (hydr) oxides. J Colloid Interface Sci 308(2):395–404

Wijnja H, Schulthess CP (1999) ATR–FTIR and DRIFT spectroscopy of carbonate species at the aged γ-Al2O3/water interface. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 55(4):861–872

SOURCE CLAY PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL DATA. http://www.clays.org/sourceclays_data.html. Accessed 16 May 2020

Kumar S et al (2012) X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy study of Eu (III) sorption products onto amorphous silica and γ-alumina: effect of pH and substrate. Polyhedron 33(1):33–40

Bradbury MH, Baeyens B (2006) Modelling sorption data for the actinides Am (III), Np (V) and Pa (V) on montmorillonite. Radiochim Acta 94(9–11):619–625

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Thông tin tác giả