Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions

US Congress (2003) 21st century nanotechnology research and development act, US Public Law 108-153, 108th Congress, December 3 2003. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC US House of Representatives, Committee on Science (2003) House Report 108-89. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC Guston DH, Sarewitz D (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Technol Soc 24:93–109 The Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. The Royal Society, London Wilsdon J (2005) Paddling upstream: new currents in European technology assessment. In: Rejeski D (ed) The future of technology assessment. Foresight and governance project at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, pp 22–28 Wilsdon J, Wynne B, Stigloe J (2005). The public value of science: or how to ensure that science really matters. Demos, London Macnaughten P, Kearnes M, Wynne B (2005) Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? Sci Commun 27(2):1–24 De Witte P, Schuddeboom P (2006) NanoNed annual report 2005. NanoNed Office, Utrecht Rip A (2005) Technology assessment as part of the co-evolution of nanotechnology and society: the thrust of the TA program in NanoNed. Nanotechnology in science, economy and society. Marburg, Germany, January 13–15 Schot J (2005) Constructive technology assessment. In: Mitcham C (ed) Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics. MacMillan Reference USA, New York, pp 423–426 Rip A, Misa TJ, Schot J (1995) Managing technology in society: the approach of constructive technology assessment. Pinter, London Schot J, Rip A (1997) The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technol Forecast Soc Change 54:251–268 Schot J (2001) Towards new forms of participatory technology development. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 13:39–52 Flemish Institute for Science and Technology (March 2006) NanoSoc: nanotechnologies for tomorrow’s society. Unpublished project description Goorden L, van Oudheusden M, Evers J, Deblonde M (in press) In: Fisher E, Selin C, Wetmore J (eds) Yearbook of nanotechnology in society, vol 1: excavating nanotechnology’s futures. Springer Science and Business Media, New York Berne R (2006) Nano-ethics. In: Mitcham C (ed) Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics. MacMillan Reference USA, New York, pp 1259–1262 Berne R (2004) Tiny ethics for big challenges: calling for an ethics of nanoscale science and engineering. IEEE Circuits Devices Mag, May/June, 10–17 Sweeney AE (2006) Social and ethical dimensions of nanoscale science and engineering research. Sci Eng Ethics 12(3):435–464 Fisher E, Mahajan RL (2006) Contradictory intent? US federal legislation on integrating societal concerns into nanotechnology research and development. Sci Public Policy 33(1):5–16 Gorman ME, Groves JF, Catalano RK (2004) Societal dimensions of nanotechnology. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 23(4):55–62 Van Merkerk RO, Smits REHM (2007) Tailoring CTA for emerging technologies. Technol Forecast Soc Change (in press) Pinch TJ, Bijker WE (1987) The social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In: Pinch TJ, Hughes TP, Bijker WE (eds) The Social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 17–50 Van den Belt H, Rip A (1987) The Nelson Winter Dosi model and synthetic dye chemistry. In: Pinch TJ, Hughes TP, Bijker WE (eds) The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 187–199 Jackson R, Barbagallo F, Haste H (2005) Strengths of public dialogue on science-related issues. Crit Rev Int Soc Polit Philos 8(3):349–358 Bijker WE (1995) Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: toward a theory of sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Arthur B (1969) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99:115–131 Collingridge D (1980) The social control of technology. Frances Pinter, London Fisher E, Mahajan RL, Mitcham C (2006) Midstream modulation of technology: governance from within. Bull Sci Technol Soc 26(6):485–496 Sismondo S (2004) An introduction to science and technology studies. Blackwell, Oxford Traweek S (1988) Beamtimes and lifetimes: the world of high energy physicists. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Bucciarelli LL (1994) Designing engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Knorr Cetina KD (1995) Laboratory studies: the cultural approach to the study of science. In: Jasanoff S, Markle GE, Petersen JC, Pinch TJ (eds) Handbook of science, technology and society. Sage, Los Angeles Owen-Smith J (2001) Managing laboratory work through skepticism: processes of evaluation and control. Am Sociol Rev 66(3):427–452 Lasswell HD (1971) A pre-view of policy sciences. American Elsevier Publishing, New York Clark TW (2002) The policy process. Yale University Press, New Haven Pickering A (1995) The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago Fisher E, Mahajan RL (2006) Midstream modulation of nanotechnology research in an academic laboratory. American Society for Mechanical Engineers International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Chicago, Illinois, November 5–10 de Castell S, Walker T (1991) Identity, metamorphosis, and ethnographic research: what ‘kind’ of story is ‘ways with words’? Anthropol Educ Q 22(1):3–20