Ethical issues related to research on genome editing in human embryos

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal - Tập 18 - Trang 887-896 - 2020
Emilia Niemiec1, Heidi Howard1
1Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Knott, 2018, CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering, Science, 361, 866, 10.1126/science.aat5011

Liang, 2015, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes, Protein Cell, 6, 363, 10.1007/s13238-015-0153-5

Araki, 2014, International regulatory landscape and integration of corrective genome editing into in vitro fertilization, Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 12, 1

Daley, 2019, After the storm – A responsible path for genome editing, N Engl J Med, 380, 897, 10.1056/NEJMp1900504

Brokowski, 2018, Do CRISPR germline ethics statements cut it?, Cris J, 10.1089/crispr.2017.0024

Lander, 2019, Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing, Nature, 567, 165, 10.1038/d41586-019-00726-5

The Hinxton Group. Statement on Genome Editing Technologies and Human Germline Genetic Modification 2015.

De Wert, 2018, Human germline gene editing: Recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE, Eur J Hum Genet, 26, 445, 10.1038/s41431-017-0076-0

Ormond, 2017, Human germline genome editing, Am J Hum Genet, 101, 167, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.012

Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genome editing and human reproduction. 2018.

National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics and Governance. Washington, D.C.: 2017. doi:10.17226/24623.

Gyngell, 2017, The ethics of germline gene editing, J Appl Philos, 34, 498, 10.1111/japp.12249

Rulli, 2019, Reproductive CRISPR does not cure disease, Bioethics, 33, 1072, 10.1111/bioe.12663

Ranisch, 2019, Germline genome editing versus preimplantation genetic diagnosis: is there a case in favour of germline interventions?, Bioethics, 34, 60, 10.1111/bioe.12635

Viotti, 2019, Estimating demand for germline genome editing: an in vitro fertilization clinic perspective, Cris J, 2, 304, 10.1089/crispr.2019.0044

Wolf, 2019, Principles of and strategies for germline gene therapy, Nat Med, 25, 890, 10.1038/s41591-019-0473-8

Steffann, 2018, Could failure in preimplantation genetic diagnosis justify editing the human embryo genome?, Cell Stem Cell, 22, 481, 10.1016/j.stem.2018.01.004

Krimsky, 2019, Breaking the germline barrier in a moral vacuum, Account Res, 26, 351, 10.1080/08989621.2019.1644171

Savulescu, 2015, The moral imperative to continue gene editing research on human embryos, Protein Cell, 6, 476, 10.1007/s13238-015-0184-y

Denier, 2006, Need or desire? A conceptual and moral phenomenology of the child wish, Int J Appl Philos, 20, 81, 10.5840/ijap20062018

Smolenski, 2015, CRISPR/Cas9 and germline modification: new difficulties in obtaining informed consent, Am J Bioeth, 15, 35, 10.1080/15265161.2015.1103816

Cussins, 2018, Germline modification and policymaking: the relationship between mitochondrial replacement and gene editing, New Bioeth, 24, 74, 10.1080/20502877.2018.1443409

Center for Genetics and Society. Open Letter on Reproductive Human Germline Modification Organized by Center for Genetics and Society 2015. https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/internal-content/open-letter-calls-prohibition-reproductive-human-germline-modification.

Lanphier, 2015, Don’t edit the human germ line, Nature, 519, 410, 10.1038/519410a

Darnovsky, 2018

World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects 2013. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ (accessed March 31, 2020).

Drabiak, 2018, Emerging governance of mitochondrial replacement therapy: assessing coherence between scientific evidence and policy outcomes, DePaul J Health Care Law, 20

Friedmann, 2015, ASGCT and JSGT joint position statement on human genomic editing, Mol Ther, 23, 1282, 10.1038/mt.2015.118

International Commission on the Clinical Use of Human Germline Genome Editing. Call for evidence 2019. https://www.nationalacademies.org/_cache_58c4/content/4885770000148509.pdf (accessed March 31, 2020).

Ma, 2017, Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryos, Nature, 548, 413, 10.1038/nature23305

Tang, 2017, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human zygotes using Cas9 protein, Mol Genet Genomics, 292, 525, 10.1007/s00438-017-1299-z

Zeng, 2018, Correction of the Marfan syndrome pathogenic FBN1 mutation by base editing in human cells and heterozygous embryos, Mol Ther, 26, 2631, 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.08.007

Kang, 2016, Introducing precise genetic modifications into human 3PN embryos by CRISPR / Cas-mediated genome editing, J Assist Reprod Genet, 581, 10.1007/s10815-016-0710-8

Li, 2019, Efficient generation of pathogenic A-to-G mutations in human tripronuclear embryos via ABE-mediated base editing, Mol Ther - Nucleic Acids, 17, 289, 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.05.021

Zhang, 2019, Human cleaving embryos enable robust homozygotic nucleotide substitutions by base editors, Genome Biol, 20, 1, 10.1186/s13059-019-1703-6

Fogarty, 2017, Genome editing reveals a role for OCT4 in human embryogenesis, Nature, 550, 67, 10.1038/nature24033

2017, Genome editing in clinical genetics: Points to consider-A statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Genet Med, 19, 723, 10.1038/gim.2016.195

Howard, 2017, One small edit for humans, one giant edit for humankind? Points and questions to consider for a responsible way forward for gene editing in humans, Eur J Hum Genet, 1

National Institutes of Health. Human Embryo Research and Cloning Prohibitions 2019. https://oir.nih.gov/sourcebook/ethical-conduct/special-research-considerations/human-stem-cell-use/human-embryo-research-cloning-prohibitions.

European Commission Directorate General for Research & Innovation. Horizon 2020 Programme: Guidance how to complete your ethics self-assessment 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/ethics/h2020_hi_ethics-self-assess_en.pdf.

Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Human embryo culture: discussions concerning the statutory time limit for maintaining human embryos in culture in the light of some recent scientific developments; 2017.

Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine; 1997.

Ballantyne, 2008, Wanted — egg donors for research: a research ethics approach to donor recruitment and compensation, J Fem Approaches Bioeth, 1, 145

Jayaprakasan, 2007, Estimating the risks of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): Implications for egg donation for research, Hum Fertil, 10, 183, 10.1080/14647270601021743

Schneider, 2017, Long-term breast cancer risk following ovarian stimulation in young egg donors: a call for follow-up, research and informed consent, Reprod Biomed Online, 34, 480, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.02.003

Magnus, 2005, Issues in oocyte donation for stem cell research, Science, 308, 1747, 10.1126/science.1114454

International Society for Stem Cells Research. Guidlines for stem cell research and clinical translation. 2016.

National Research Council. Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2005. doi:10.17226/11278.

Niemiec E, Howard HC. Germline genome editing research: what are gamete donors (not) informed about in consent forms ? 2020;3:52–63. doi:10.1089/crispr.2019.0043.

Pinxten, 2014, Ethical issues raised by whole genome sequencing, Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 28, 269, 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.02.004

Niemiec E and Howard HC (2019) Chapter 3: Consenting patients to genome sequencing. In: Tibben A and Biesecker BB (eds.) Clinical genome sequencing: Psychological considerations, Elsevier

Howard, 2018, Mapping uncertainty in genomics, J Risk Res, 21, 117, 10.1080/13669877.2016.1215344

European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.

Baylis, 2019

Maeder, 2016, Genome-editing technologies for gene and cell therapy, Mol Ther, 24, 430, 10.1038/mt.2016.10

Hurlbut, 2019, Human genome editing: ask whether, not how, Nature, 565, 135, 10.1038/d41586-018-07881-1

Baylis, 2019, Questioning the proposed translational pathway for germline genome editing, Nat Hum Behav, 3, 200, 10.1038/s41562-019-0544-3

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine. International Commission on the Clinical Use of Human Germline Genome Editing 2019. https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/international-commission-on-the-clinical-use-of-human-germline-genome-editing (accessed March 31, 2020).

Zuo, 2019, Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos, Science, 364, 289, 10.1126/science.aav9973

Jin, 2019, Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice, Science, 364, 292, 10.1126/science.aaw7166

Liang, 2017, Correction of β-thalassemia mutant by base editor in human embryos, Protein & Cell, 8, 811, 10.1007/s13238-017-0475-6

Martin-Palomino Olid, 2019, Could fertility clinics offer a sizable improvement of live birth rates by maturing post-GVBD oocytes in vitro?, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 36, 1927, 10.1007/s10815-019-01540-8

OHSU Center for Women's Health. OHSU Fertility Egg Donation Process; 2020. [Accessed 30 March 2020].

Church, 2017, Compelling Reasons for Repairing Human Germlines, The New England Journal of Medicine, 377, 1909, 10.1056/NEJMp1710370