Tác động Đạo đức và Tâm lý Xã hội của Vô sinh Nữ

Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports - Tập 1 - Trang 153-158 - 2012
Ophra Leyser-Whalen1, Jeff R. Temple2, John Y. Phelps2
1Department of Sociology and Anthropology, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, USA
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UTMB Health, Galveston, USA

Tóm tắt

Bài báo này tổng hợp nghiên cứu trong năm qua về tác động đạo đức và tâm lý xã hội của vô sinh đối với phụ nữ và nam giới. Chúng tôi thảo luận về một số vấn đề liên quan đến việc kích thích buồng trứng, đặc biệt là tình trạng sinh nhiều lần cao, lưu trữ trứng (đặc biệt là cho mục đích nghiên cứu), và dự trữ buồng trứng giảm. Chúng tôi cũng trình bày các công trình gần đây liên quan đến sự lo âu và tư vấn, bao gồm sự chú ý nhiều hơn đến các nhóm phụ nữ vô sinh. Gần đây, nhiều nghiên cứu về các vấn đề mà nam giới đối mặt đã xuất hiện, và chúng tôi phác thảo những vấn đề này liên quan đến mối quan hệ của họ với phụ nữ vô sinh, hoặc với tư cách là bệnh nhân vô sinh. Cuối cùng, chúng tôi phác thảo một số vấn đề đạo đức do các thủ tục bảo quản khả năng sinh sản và cấy ghép tử cung mới gây ra.

Từ khóa

#vô sinh #tác động tâm lý xã hội #đạo đức #kích thích buồng trứng #lưu trữ trứng #tư vấn

Tài liệu tham khảo

Frith L, Jacoby A, Gabbay M. Ethical boundary-work in the infertility clinic. Soc Health Illness. 2011;33:570–85. Li XH, Ma YG, Geng LH, et al. Baseline psychological stress and ovarian norepinephrine levels negatively affect the outcome of in vitro fertilization. Gyn Endocrin. 2011;27:139–43. Paul-Simon A. Infertility and multiples. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2011;11:180–4. Beall SA, DeCherney A. History and challenges surrounding ovarian stimulation in the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:795–801. Lee KC. Fertility treatments and the cost of a healthy baby. Nurs Womens Health. 2011;15:15–8. • Manninen BA. Parental, medical, and sociological responsibilities: “Octomom” as a case study in the ethics of fertility treatments. J Clinic Res Bioeth. 2011;S1:1–11. This article explores the ethical dimensions of fertility treatments that have potential to create higher-order multiple births. Ethical responsibility is placed on patients, physicians, insurance companies, and the media. Hou X. Con: Should there be a limit of one single embryo implanted during an IVF cycle? MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2011;36:153. Huang Z. Pro: Should there be a limit of one single embryo implanted during an IVF cycle? MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2011;36:152. Kalfoglou AL, Sauer MV. A precautionary approach to oocyte donation for stem ell nuclear transplantation. Am J Bioethics. 2011;11:31–3. Ellison B, Meliker J. Assessing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in egg donation: implications for human embryonic stem cell research. Am J Bioethics. 2011;11:22–30. Batzer F, Daar J. Harmony and compensation for oocyte providers. Am J Bioethics. 2011;11:39–41. Mertes H, Pennings G. Ethical concerns eliminated: safer stimulation protocols and egg banking. Am J Bioethics. 2011;11:33–5. Fiore RN, Hinsch KM. Oocytes for research: reevaluating risks and compensation. Am J Bioethics. 2011;11:42–3. Bamford R. Reconsidering risk to women: oocyte donation for human embryonic stem cell research. Am J Bioethics. 2011;11:37–9. Kalbian A. Considering the risks to economically disadvantaged egg donors. Am J Bioethics. 2011;11:44–5. Stein AL. The conundrum of oocyte donation, human research, OHSS, and ethics. Am J Bioethics. 2011;11:35–7. Karipcin FS, Hossain A, Phelps JY. A legal-ethical analysis of reproductive endocrinologists’ right to refuse ovulation induction to patients with diminished ovarian reserve. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:1105–9. Greil AL, McQuillan J, Shreffler KM, et al. Race-ethnicity and medical services for infertility: stratified reproduction in a population-based sample of U.S. women. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52:493–509. Greil AL, Johnson KM, Mcquillan J, Lacy N. Are prior pregnancy outcomes relevant for models of fertility-specific distress or infertility help-seeking? Hum Fert. 2011;14:160–6. McCarthy MP, Chiu S-H. Differences in women’s psychological well-being based on infertility treatment choice and outcome. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2011;56:475–80. Johnson KM, Fledderjohann J: Revisiting “her infertility: medicalized embodiment, self-identification and distress. Soc Sci Med, 2012, in press. Greil AL, Shreffler KM, Schmidt L, McQuillan J. Variation in distress among women with infertility: Evidence from a population-based sample. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2101–12. Martins MV, Peterson BD, Almeida VM, Costa ME. Direct and indirect effects of perceived social support on women’s infertility-related stress. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2113–21. Blyth E. Guidelines for infertility counseling in different countries: is there an emerging trend? Hum Reprod. 2012;0:1–12. doi:10.1093/humrep/des112. Machin L. A hierarchy of needs? Embryo donation, in vitro fertilization and the provision of infertility counselling. Patient Ed Counsel. 2011;85:264–8. Storrow RF. The ethics of exclusion in infertility care. J Clin Res Bioeth. 2011;2:114–5. Palha AP, Lourenço MF. Psychological and cross-cultural aspects of infertility and human sexuality. Adv Psychosom Med. 2011;31:164–83. Thompson EH, Woodward JT, Stanton AL. Moving forward during major goal blockage: Situational goal adjustment in women facing infertility. J Behav Med. 2011;34:275–87. Bak CW, Seok HH, Song SH, et al. Hormonal imbalances and psychological scars left behind in infertile men. J Andro. 2012;33:181–9. Chubak B, Thomas AJ. Ethical dilemmas in male infertility. In: Sabenegh ES, editor. Current clinical urology: Male infertility: Problems and solutions. New York: Springer Science; 2011. p. 125–8. • Fisher JRW, Hammarberg K. Psychological and social aspects of infertility in men: an overview of the evidence and implications for psychologically informed clinical care and future research. Asian J Androl. 2012;14:121–9. This article reviews studies on the psychosocial aspects of infertility in men. Despite diversity in conceptualization, design, setting, and data collection, there was consistency in findings. Steuber KR, Solomon DH. Relational uncertainty, partner interference, and privacy boundary turbulence: explaining spousal discrepancies in infertility disclosures. J Soc Personal Relation. 2012;29:3–27. Shah DK, Goldman E, Fisseha S. Medical, ethical, and legal considerations in fertility preservation. Intl J Gyn Ob. 2011;115:11–5. Lefkowitz A, Edwards M, Blayla J. The Montreal criteria for the ethical feasibility of uterine transplantation. Transplant Intl. 2012;25:439–47.