Ethical Community-Engaged Research: A Literature Review

American journal of public health - Tập 103 Số 12 - Trang e7-e14 - 2013
Lisa Mikesell1, Elizabeth Bromley1, Dmitry Khodyakov1
1Lisa Mikesell is with the Communication Department, School of Communication and Information, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. Elizabeth Bromley is with the Semel Institute Center for Health Services and Society, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, and the Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System. Dmitry Khodyakov is with the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

Tóm tắt

Health research has relied on ethical principles, such as those of the Belmont Report, to protect the rights and well-being of research participants. Community-based participatory research (CBPR), however, must also consider the rights and well-being of communities. This requires additional ethical considerations that have been extensively discussed but not synthesized in the CBPR literature. We conducted a comprehensive thematic literature review and summarized empirically grounded discussions of ethics in CBPR, with a focus on the value of the Belmont principles in CBPR, additional essential components of ethical CBPR, the ethical challenges CBPR practitioners face, and strategies to ensure that CBPR meets ethical standards. Our study provides a foundation for developing a working definition and a conceptual model of ethical CBPR.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1001/jama.283.20.2701

The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1979, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects Research

10.1525/jer.2007.2.2.25

10.1289/ehp.9005

10.1353/cpr.0.0046

10.1177/0969733009350261

10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1776

10.1289/ehp.01109s3435

10.1111/j.1541-0064.2012.00432.x

10.1177/109019819902600412

10.2105/AJPH.2009.170506

10.3200/JOEE.35.2.3-15

10.1353/cpr.0.0094

10.1007/s11948-003-0046-5

10.2105/AJPH.2010.194340

10.1300/J125v14n04_02

Blumenthal DS, 2006, Prev Chronic Dis, 3, A16

10.1177/109019810202900104

10.1186/1476-069X-9-39

10.1353/cpr.2007.0006

10.1007/s11524-007-9165-7

Jesson J, 2011, Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques

10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.43

10.1289/ehp.02110437

10.1097/00012272-200407000-00002

10.1177/1090198104269566

10.1177/0269216306073110

Chen DT, 2006, Ethn Dis, 16, S118

10.1097/00000441-200111000-00001

10.2105/AJPH.2008.155390

10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.07.017

10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00120.x

10.1177/1363461507081642

10.1007/s11948-006-0047-2

10.1086/302013

Macaulay AC, 1998, Int J Circumpolar Health, 57, 38

Macaulay AC, 1998, Can J Public Health, 89, 105, 10.1007/BF03404399

Poland BD, 2002, Can J Public Health, 93, 344, 10.1007/BF03404566

10.1097/00003727-200701001-00003

10.1289/ehp.98106833

10.1177/1476750307083720

10.1177/1469004704047507

10.1080/14742837.2012.664898

10.1207/s15430154jce2001s_10

10.1525/jer.2008.3.2.53

10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.004

10.1177/1524839909352841

10.1289/ehp.1103904

10.1186/1477-7517-4-20

10.1111/j.1440-1800.2010.00507.x

10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.09.010

10.1177/1473325002001002619

10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02416.x

10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.77

Flicker S, 2012, Can J Public Health, 103, 19, 10.1007/BF03404063

10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00124.x

10.1525/jer.2012.7.1.17

10.2105/AJPH.2005.082172

10.1289/ehp.02110s2145

10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.13

10.1525/jer.2008.3.2.5

10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01102.x

10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182441680

10.3402/ijch.v66i1.18221

10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00557.x

10.1177/1476750306066803

10.1525/jer.2008.3.2.77

10.2105/AJPH.2006.094813

10.1177/1049732305276687

10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02944.x