Estlund on Epistocracy: A Critique

Res Publica - Tập 18 Số 3 - Trang 241-258 - 2012
Kasper Lippert‐Rasmussen1
1Aarhus Universitet

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson, Elizabeth. 2008. An epistemic defense of democracy: David Estlund’s democratic authority. Episteme 5: 129–139.

Estlund, David. 2003. Why not epistocracy? In Desire, identity and. existence: Essays in honor of T. M. Penner, ed. Naomi Reshotko, 53–69. Canada: Academic Printing and Publishing.

Estlund, David. 2008. Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Estlund, David. 2010. Replies to Saunders, Lister and Quong. Representation 46: 53–67.

Gaus, Gerald. 2011. On seeking the truth (whatever that is) through democracy: Estlund’s case for the qualified epistemic claim. Ethics 121: 270–300.

Hong, Lu, and Scott E Page. 2004. Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America, vol. 101, p. 16385.

Lafont, Cristina. Who’s afraid of epistemocracy? On D. Estlund’s Democratic Authority (forthcoming).

List, Christian. 2005. Group knowledge and group rationality: A judgment aggregation perspective. Episteme 2: 25–38.

Marsilius of Padua. 2005 [1324]. In The Defender of the peace, Ed and trans, Annabelle Brett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mill, John Stuart. 1987 [1861]. Considerations on representative government. London: Dent.

Plato. 1983 [c. 380BC]. The republic. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Quong, Jonathan. 2010. The distribution of authority. Representation 46: 35–52.

Rydgren, Jens. 2008. Immigration sceptics, xenophobes or racists? Radical right-wing voting in six west European countries. European Journal of Political Research 47: 737–765.

Zollman, Kevin J.S. 2010. The transient benefit of transient diversity. Erkenntnis 72: 17–35.