Estimating the benefits of recreation-oriented management in state-owned commercial forests in Finland: A choice experiment

Act on Metsähallitus 1378/2004. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Finland. Available: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2004/en20041378.pdf, 2013 (accessed 09.01.13). Adamowicz, 1997, Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 32, 65, 10.1006/jeem.1996.0957 Adamowicz, 1998, Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 80, 64, 10.2307/3180269 Bech, 2005, Effects coding in discrete choice experiments, Health Econ., 14, 1079, 10.1002/hec.984 Bennett, 2001, Some fundamentals of environmental choice modelling, 37 Bestard, 2010, Estimating the aggregate value of forest recreation in a regional context, J. For. Econ., 16, 205 Bierlaire M., 2003. BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. In: Proceedings of the third Swiss Transportation Research Conference. Ascona, Switzerland. Boxall, 2000, Exploring the preferences of wildlife recreationists for features of boreal forest management: a choice experiment approach, Can. J. For. Res., 30, 1931, 10.1139/x00-128 Campbell, 2014, Heterogeneity in the WTP for recreational access: distributional aspects, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 57, 1200, 10.1080/09640568.2013.793173 Christie, 2007, Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and contingent behavior methods, J. For. Econ., 13, 75 Fiebig, 2010, The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity, Mark. Sci., 29, 393, 10.1287/mksc.1090.0508 Garrod, 1997, The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: a contingent rank study, Ecol. Econ., 21, 45, 10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00092-4 Haefele, 2001, Using the conjoint analysis technique for the estimation of passive use values of forest health, J. For. Econ., 7, 9 Hanley, 1998, Using choice experiments to value the environment: design issues, current experience and future prospects, Environ. Res. Econ., 11, 413, 10.1023/A:1008287310583 Hanemann, 1982 Heal, 2005, 290 Hess, 2008, Asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay estimates in discrete choice models, Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev., 44, 847, 10.1016/j.tre.2007.06.002 Hill, 2006, Demand analysis projections for recreational visits to countryside woodlands in Great Britain, Forestry, 79, 185, 10.1093/forestry/cpl005 Holmes, 2003, Attribute-based methods, 185 Holmes, 2003, Stated preference methods for valuation of forest attributes, 321 Horne, 2005, Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment, For. Ecol. Manag., 207, 189, 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.026 Horne P., Koskela T., Ovaskainen V., Horne T. (Eds.), 2009. Safeguarding Forest Biodiversity in Finland: Citizens’ and Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners’ Views, Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 119, p. 59. Huhtala, 2004, What price recreation in Finland? A contingent valuation study on non-market benefits of public outdoor recreation areas, J. Leis. Res., 36, 23, 10.1080/00222216.2004.11950009 Hynes, 2008, Effects on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 90, 1011, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01148.x Jacobsen, 2008, What's in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus ‘Iconised’ species when valuing biodiversity, Environ. Res. Econ., 39, 247, 10.1007/s10640-007-9107-6 Juutinen, 2011, Combining ecological and recreational aspects in national park management: a choice experiment application, Ecol. Econ., 70, 1231, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.006 Kosenius A.-K., Juutinen A., Neuvonen M., Ovaskainen V., Sievänen T., Tolvanen A., Tyrväinen L., 2013. Virkistyskäyttöä edistävä metsänhoito valtion talousmetsissä: hyötyjen rahamääräinen arvo. [Recreation-enhancing management of state-owned commercial forests: monetary benefits.] Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 261, p. 60. Lindhjem, 2007, 20 years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: a meta-analysis, J. For. Econ., 12, 251 Louviere J., Eagle T., 2006. Confound it! That pesky little scale constant messes up our convenient assumptions. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Sawtooth Software Conference. Sequim, WA, pp. 211 – 228. McFadden, 1974, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, 105 Meyerhoff, 2009, Benefits of biodiversity enhancement due to nature-oriented silviculture: evidence from two choice experiments in Germany, J. For. Econ., 15, 37 National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. §§1600–1687). Ngene, 2010. User Manual and Reference Guide. The Cutting Edge in Experimental Design. ChoiceMetrics. p. 230. Ovaskainen, 2001, Estimating recreation demand with on-site data: an application of truncated and endogenously stratified count data models, J. For. Econ., 7, 125 Ovaskainen, 2012, Modelling recreation demand with respondent-reported driving cost and stated cost of travel time: a Finnish case, J. For. Econ., 18, 303 Poe, 2005, Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 87, 353, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00727.x Redsven V., Hirvelä H., Härkönen K., Salminen O., Siitonen M. (Eds.), 2012. MELA 2012 Reference Manual. The Finnish Forest Research Institute. p. 666. Available from: http://mela2.metla.fi/mela/julkaisut/oppaat/mela2012.pdf. Ribe, 2005, Aesthetic perceptions of green-tree retention harvests in vista views: the interaction of cut level, retention pattern and harvest shape, Landsc. Urban Plan., 73, 277, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.07.003 Ribe, 2009, In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the U.S. Pacific Northwest: the effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood, J. Environ. Manag., 91, 245, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.08.014 Scarpa, 2008, Utility in willingness to pay space: a tool to address confounding random scale effects in destination choice to the Alps, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 90, 994, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01155.x Scarpa, 2010, Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: primary and discretionary choice of British households’ for micro-generation technologies, Energy Econ., 32, 129, 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.004 Scarpa, 2013, Inferred and stated attribute non-attendance in food choice experiments, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 95, 165, 10.1093/ajae/aas073 Schaberg, 1999, Ascribing value to ecological processes: an economic view of environmental change, For. Ecol. Manag., 114, 329, 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00363-6 Sievänen T., Neuvonen M., 2011. Luonnon virkistyskäyttö 2010 [Recreation in the nature 2010]. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 212. p. 190. Silvennoinen, 2002, Effect of cuttings on the scenic beauty of a tree stand, Scand. J. For. Res., 17, 263, 10.1080/028275802753742936 Sonnier, 2007, Heterogeneity distributions of willingness-to-pay in choice models, Quant. Mark. Econ., 5, 313, 10.1007/s11129-007-9024-6 Swait, 1993, The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and use of multinominal logit models, J. Mark. Res., 30, 305, 10.2307/3172883 Thiene, 2009, Deriving and testing efficient estimates of WTP distributions in destination choice models, Environ. Res. Econ., 44, 379, 10.1007/s10640-009-9291-7 Thiene, 2012, Scale and taste heterogeneity for forest biodiversity: models of serial nonparticipation and their effects, J. For. Econ., 18, 355 Tolvanen, 2013, Preferences of local people for the use of peatlands: the case of peatland-richest region in Finland, Ecol. Soc., 18, 19, 10.5751/ES-05496-180219 Train, 1998, Recreation demand models with taste differences over people, Land Econ., 74, 230, 10.2307/3147053 Train, 2009 Train, 2005, Discrete Choice models in preference space and willingness-to-pay space, 1 Tyrväinen L., Silvennoinen H., Hallikainen V., 2010. Kansainvälisten matkailijoiden maisema- ja ympäristöarvostukset Pohjois-Suomessa [Scenic and environmental preferences of international tourists in Northern Finland]. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 147, p. 52. Tyrväinen, 2014, Demand for enhanced forest amenities in private lands: the case of the Ruka-Kuusamo tourism area, Finland, For. Policy Econ., 47, 4, 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.05.007 von Haefen, 2005, Serial nonparticipation in repeated discrete choice models, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 87, 1061, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00794.x Zandersen, 2009, A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe, J. For. Econ., 15, 109