Estimating Willingness to Pay for River Amenities and Safety Measures Associated with Shale Gas Extraction

Eastern Economic Journal - Tập 39 - Trang 28-44 - 2012
Paula Bernstein1, Thomas C Kinnaman1, Mengqi Wu1
1Department of Economics, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, USA

Tóm tắt

This paper utilizes a Contingent Valuation Method survey of a random sample of residents to estimate that households are willing to pay an average of US$12.00 per month for public projects designed to improve river access and US$10.46 per month for additional safety measures that would eliminate risks to local watersheds from drilling for natural gas from underground shale formations. These estimates can be compared with the costs of providing each of these two amenities to help foster the formation of efficient policy decisions.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrews, Thomas P. 2001. A Contingent Valuation Survey of Improved Water Quality in the Brandywine River: An Example of Applied Economics in the Classroom. Pennsylvania Economic Review, 10 (1): 1–13. Bateman, I.J., M.A. Cole, S. Georgiou, and D.J. Hadley . 2006. Comparing Contingent Valuation and Contingent Ranking: A Case Study Considering the Benefits of Urban River Water Quality Improvements. Journal of Environmental Management, 79 (3): 221–231. Bockstael, N.E., K.E. McConnell, and I.E. Strand . 1989. Measuring the Benefits of Improvements in Water Quality: The Chesapeake Bay. Marine Resource Economics, 6 (1): 1–18. Cameron, Trudy Ann 1991. Interval Estimates of Non-Market Resource Values from Referendum Contingent Valuation Surveys. Land Economics, 67 (4): 413–421. Cameron, Trudy Ann, and Michelle D. James . 1987. Efficient Estimation Methods for “Closed-Ended” Contingent Valuation Surveys. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69 (2): 269–276. Carson, Richard T., Robert C. Mitchell, Michael Hanemann, Raymond J. Kopp, Stanley Presser, and Paul A. Ruud . 2003. Contingent Valuation and Lost Passive Use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. Environmental and Resource Economics, 25 (3): 257–286. Collins, Alan, Randy Rosenberger, and Jerald Fletcher . 2005. The Economic Value of Stream Restoration. Water Resources Research, 41, W02017, doi:10.1029/2004WR003353. Garrod, G.D., and K.G. Willis . 1996. Estimating the Benefits of Environmental Enhancement: A Case Study of the River Darent. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39 (2): 189–203. Green, C.H., and S.M. Tunstall . 1991. The Evaluation of River Quality Improvements by the Contingent Valuation Method. Applied Economics, 23 (7): 1135–1146. Hammitt, James K., and Ying Zhou . 2006. The Economic Value of Air-Pollution-Related Health Risks in China: A Contingent Valuation Study. Environmental & Resource Economics, 33 (3): 399–423. Hansen, Even, Alan Collins, Julie Svetlik, Sarah McClurg, Alyse Shrecongost, Rob Stenger, Mariya Schilz, and Fritz Boettner . 2008. An Economic Benefit Analysis for Abandoned Mine Drainage Remediation in the West Branch Susquehanna River Watershed, Pennsylvania, Report prepared for Trout Unlimited, http://www.pahikingtrails.com/files/Economic%20Benefits%20WBS.pdf. Holmes, Thomas P., John C. Bergstrom, Eric Huszar, Susan B. Kask, and Fritz Orr, III . 2004. Contingent valuation, Net Marginal Benefits, and the Scale of Riparian Ecosystem Restoration. Ecological Economics, 49 (1): 19–30. Hurley, Terrance M., Daniel Otto, and Janice Holtkamp . 1999. Valuation of Water Quality in Livestock Regions: An Application to Rural Watersheds in Iowa. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 31 (1): 177–184. Irvin, Stephen, Timothy Haab, and Fred J. Hitzhusen . 2007. Estimating Willingness to Pay for Additional Protection of Ohio Surface Waters: Contingent Valuation of Water Quality, in Economic Value of River Systems (New Horizon in Environmental Economic Series), edited by Fred J. Hitzhusen. Cheltenham, U.K. and Northhampton, Mass: Elgar, 35–51. Loomis, John B., Paula Kent, Liz Strange, Kurt Fausch, and Alan Covich . 2000. Measuring the Total Economic Value of Restoring Ecosystem Services in an Impaired River Basin: Results from a Contingent Valuation Survey. Ecological Economics, 33 (1): 103–117. Ojeda, Monica Ilija, Alex S. Mayer, and Barry D. Solomon . 2008. Economic Valuation of Environmental Services Sustained by Water Flows in the Yaqui River Delta. Ecological Economics, 65 (1): 155–166. Paulrud, Anton, and Thomas Laitila . 2004. Valuation of Management Policies for Sport-fishing on Sweden's Kaitum River. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47 (6): 863–879. Riddle, Mary, and W. Douglass Shaw . 2003. Option Wealth and Bequest Values: The Value of Protecting Future Generations from the Health Risks of Nuclear Waste Storage. Land Economics, 79 (4): 537–548. Toole Recreation Planning. 2003. Susquehanna Greenway Public Opinion Survey 2002/2003, Mimeo. Weber, Matthew A., and Steven Stewart . 2009. Public Values for River Restoration Options on the Middle Rio Grande. Restoration Ecology, 17 (6): 762–771. Zhongmin, Xu, Cheng Guodong, Zhang Zhiqiang, Su Zhiyong, and John Loomis . 2003. Applying Contingent Valuation in China to Measure the Total Economic Value of Restoring Ecosystem Services in Ejina Region. Ecological Economics, 44 (2–3): 345–358.