Establishment of a new practical telesurgical platform using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System: a preclinical study
Tóm tắt
The recent development of new surgical robots and network telecommunication technology has opened new avenues for robotic telesurgery. Although a few gastroenterological surgeries have been performed in the telesurgery setting, more technically demanding procedures including gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and intracorporeal anastomosis have never been reported. We examined the feasibility of telesurgical robotic gastrectomy using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System in a preclinical setting. First, the suturing time in the dry model was measured in the virtual telesurgery setting to determine the latency time threshold. Second, a surgeon cockpit and a patient unit were installed at Okazaki Medical Center and Fujita Health University, respectively (approximately 30 km apart), and connected using a 10-Gbps leased optic-fiber network. After evaluating the feasibility in the dry gastrectomy model, robotic distal gastrectomies with D2 lymphadenectomy and intracorporeal B-I anastomosis were performed in two porcine models. The virtual telesurgery study identified a latency time threshold of 125 ms. In the actual telesurgery setting, the latency time was 27 ms, including a 2-ms telecommunication network delay and a 25-ms local information process delay. After verifying the feasibility of the operative procedures using a gastrectomy model, two telesurgical gastrectomies were successfully completed without any unexpected events. No fluctuation was observed across the actual telesurgeries. Short-distance telesurgical robotic surgery for technically more demanding procedure may be safely conducted using the hinotori Surgical Robot System connected by high-speed optic-fiber communication.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413:379–380
Anvari M, McKinley C, Stein H (2005) Establishment of the world’s first telerobotic remote surgical service: for provision of advanced laparoscopic surgery in a rural community. Ann Surg 241:460–464
Anvari M (2007) Remote telepresence surgery: the Canadian experience. Surg Endosc 21:537–541
Satcher RL, Bogler O, Hyle L, Lee A, Simmons A, Williams R, Hawk E, Matin S, Brewster AM (2014) Telemedicine and telesurgery in cancer care: inaugural conference at MD Anderson Cancer Center. J Surg Oncol 110:353–359
Gambadauro P, Torrejon R (2013) The “tele” factor in surgery today and tomorrow: implications for surgical training and education. Surg Today 43:115–122
Choi PJ, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS (2018) Telesurgery: past, present, and future. Cureus 10:e2716
Lacy AM, Bravo R, Otero-Pineiro AM, Pena R, De Lacy FB, Menchaca R, Balibrea JM (2019) 5G-assisted telementored surgery. Br J Surg 106:1576–1579
Morohashi H, Hakamada K, Kanno T, Kawashima K, Akasaka H, Ebihara Y, Oki E, Hirano S, Mori M (2021) Social implementation of a remote surgery system in Japan: a field experiment using a newly developed surgical robot via a commercial network. Surg Today. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02384-5
Shibasaki S, Suda K, Obama K, Yoshida M, Uyama I (2020) Should robotic gastrectomy become a standard surgical treatment option for gastric cancer? Surg Today 50:955–965
Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2021) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer 24:1–21
Mori T, Kimura T, Kitajima M (2010) Skill accreditation system for laparoscopic gastroenterologic surgeons in Japan. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19:18–23
Shibasaki S, Suda K, Kadoya S, Ishida Y, Nakauchi M, Nakamura K, Akimoto S, Tanaka T, Kikuchi K, Inaba K, Uyama I (2022) The safe performance of robotic gastrectomy by second-generation surgeons meeting the operating surgeon’s criteria in the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery guidelines. Asian J Endosc Surg 15:70–81
Uyama I, Kanaya S, Ishida Y, Inaba K, Suda K, Satoh S (2012) Novel integrated robotic approach for suprapancreatic D2 nodal dissection for treating gastric cancer: technique and initial experience. World J Surg 36:331–337
Suda K, Man IM, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Satoh S, Uyama I (2015) Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc 29:673–685
Man IM, Suda K, Kikuchi K, Tanaka T, Furuta S, Nakauchi M, Ishikawa K, Ishida Y, Uyama I (2015) Totally intracorporeal delta-shaped B-I anastomosis following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using the Tri-Staple reloads on the manual Ultra handle: a prospective cohort study with historical controls. Surg Endosc 29:3304–3312
Sterbis JR, Hanly EJ, Herman BC, Marohn MR, Broderick TJ, Shih SP, Harnett B, Doarn C, Schenkman NS (2008) Transcontinental telesurgical nephrectomy using the da Vinci robot in a porcine model. Urology 71:971–973
Xu S, Perez M, Yang K, Perrenot C, Felblinger J, Hubert J (2014) Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer((R)) simulator. Surg Endosc 28:2569–2576
Wirz R, Torres LG, Swaney PJ, Gilbert H, Alterovitz R, Webster RJ 3rd, Weaver KD, Russell PT 3rd (2015) An experimental feasibility study on robotic endonasal telesurgery. Neurosurgery 76:479–484
Kodera Y, Yoshida K, Kumamaru H, Kakeji Y, Hiki N, Etoh T, Honda M, Miyata H, Yamashita Y, Seto Y, Kitano S, Konno H (2019) Introducing laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in general practice: a retrospective cohort study based on a nationwide registry database in Japan. Gastric Cancer 22:202–213
Nickel F, Cizmic A, Chand M (2022) Telestration and augmented reality in minimally invasive surgery: an invaluable tool in the age of COVID-19 for remote proctoring and telementoring. JAMA Surg 157:169–170
Wild C, Lang F, Gerhauser AS, Schmidt MW, Kowalewski KF, Petersen J, Kenngott HG, Muller-Stich BP, Nickel F (2022) Telestration with augmented reality for visual presentation of intraoperative target structures in minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09158-1,Mar9
Jarc AM, Shah SH, Adebar T, Hwang E, Aron M, Gill IS, Hung AJ (2016) Beyond 2D telestration: an evaluation of novel proctoring tools for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. J Robot Surg 10:103–109
Hung AJ, Chen J, Shah A, Gill IS (2018) Telementoring and telesurgery for minimally invasive procedures. J Urol 199:355–369
Ojima T, Nakamura M, Hayata K, Kitadani J, Katsuda M, Takeuchi A, Tominaga S, Nakai T, Nakamori M, Ohi M, Kusunoki M, Yamaue H (2021) Short-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy vs laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3182,Sep2
Lu J, Zheng CH, Xu BB, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Lin JL, Zheng HL, Huang CM, Li P (2021) Assessment of robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 273:858–867
Nakauchi M, Suda K, Shibasaki S, Nakamura K, Kadoya S, Kikuchi K, Inaba K, Uyama I (2021) Prognostic factors of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: does robotic gastrectomy bring oncological benefit? World J Gastroenterol 27:6659–6672
Kikuchi K, Suda K, Shibasaki S, Tanaka T, Uyama I (2021) Challenges in improving the minimal invasiveness of the surgical treatment for gastric cancer using robotic technology. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 5:604–613
Qian AS, Schiaffino MK, Nalawade V, Aziz L, Pacheco FV, Nguyen B, Vu P, Patel SP, Martinez ME, Murphy JD (2022) Disparities in telemedicine during COVID-19. Cancer Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4518,Jan5