Equivalence of continuum and discrete analytic sensitivity methods for nonlinear differential equations
Tóm tắt
This paper presents results for the study of equivalence between the total form continuum sensitivity equation (CSE) method and the discrete analytic method of shape design sensitivity analysis. For the discrete analytic method, the sensitivity equations are obtained by taking analytic derivatives of the discretized equilibrium equations with respect to the shape design parameters. For the CSE method, the equilibrium equations are firstly differentiated to form a set of linear continuous sensitivity equations and then discretized for solving the shape sensitivities. The sensitivity equations can be derived by taking the material derivatives (total form) or the partial derivatives (local form) of the equilibrium equations. The total form CSE method is shown for the first time to be equivalent, after finite element discretization, to the discrete analytic method for nonlinear second-order differential equations of a particular form with design dependent loads when they use the same: (1) finite element discretization, (2) numerical integration of element matrices, (3) design velocity fields that are linear with respect to the design variable and (4) shape functions for domain transformation and for design velocity field calculations. The shape sensitivity equations for three-dimensional geometric nonlinear elastic structures and linear potential flow are derived by using both total form CSE and discrete analytic method to show the equivalence of the two methods for these specific examples. The accuracy of shape sensitivity analysis is verified by potential flow around an airfoil and a joined beam with an airfoil under gust load. The results show that analytic sensitivity results are consistent with the complex step results.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akbari J, Kim N, Ahmadi M (2010) Shape sensitivity analysis with design-dependent loadings—equivalence between continuum and discrete derivatives. Struct Multidiscip Optim 40(1–6):353–364
Arora JS (1993) An exposition of the material derivatives approach for structural shape sensitivity analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 105:41–62
Barthelemy BM, Haftka RT (1988) Accuracy analysis of the semianalytical method for shape sensitivity calculation. In: 29nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. AIAA, Washington, DC
Bhaskaran R, Berkooz G (1997) Optimization of fluid-structure interaction using the sensitivity equation approach, In: 4th International Symposium on Fluid-Structure Interaction, Aeroelasticity, Flow-Induced Vibrations & Noise, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Dallas, Texas 1(53–1):49–56
Borggaard J, Burns J (1994) A sensitivity equation approach to shape optimization in fluid flows. Tech rep, Langley Res Cent
Borggaard J, Burns J (1997) A PDE sensitivity equation method for optimal aerodynamic design. J Comput Phys 136(2):366–384
Choi KK, Kim NH (2005) Structural sensitivity analysis and optimization. Springer, New York
Choi KK, Twu SL (1988) On equivalence of continuum and discrete methods of shape sensitivity analysis. AIAA J 27(10):1418–1424
Christensen WP, Klarbring A (2009) An Introduction to Structural Optimization. Springer, New York
Dems K, Haftka RT (1988) Two approaches to sensitivity analysis for shape variation of structures. Mech Struct Mach 16(4):501
Dems K, Mroz Z (1985) Variational approach to first- and second-order sensitivity analysis of elastic structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 21:637–661
Etienne S, Pelletier D (2005) A general approach to sensitivity analysis of fluid-structure interactions. J Fluids Struct 21(2):169–186
Etienne S, Hay A, Garon A, Pelletier D (2006) Shape sensitivity analysis of fluid-structure interaction problems. 36th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Confernce 2:867–881
Etienne S, Hay A, Garon A, Pelletier D (2007) Sensitivity analysis of unsteady fluid-structure interaction problems. 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 6:4059–4074
Haftka RT, Adelman HM (1989) Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis. Struct Optim 1:137–151
Haftka RT, Grandhi RV (1986) Structural shape optimization—a survey. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 57:91–106
Haftka RT, Gurdal Z (1986) Elements of Structural Optimization, 3rd ed. Kluwer Academic Publichsers, Dordrecht
Haug EJ, Arora JS (1978) Design sensitivity analysis of elastic mechanical systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 15(1):35–62
Haug EJ, Rousselet B (1980) Design sensitivity analysis in structural mechanics. i. static response variations. J Struct Mech 8(1):17–41
Jameson A (1988) Aerodynamic design via control theory. J Sci Comput 3:233–260. doi:10.1007/BF01061285
Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119:73–94
van Keulen F, Haftka RT, Kim NH (2005) Review of options for structural design sensitivity analysis. part 1: Linear systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:3213–3243
Liu S, Canfield RA (2011) Continuum shape sensitivity for nonlinear transient aeroelastic gust response. In: 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. AIAA-2011-1971, Denver
Liu S, Canfield RA (2012) Continuum shape sensitivity method for fluid flow around an airfoil. In: 53st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. AIAA-2012-1426, Honolulu
Liu S, Wickert DP, Canfield RA (2010) Fluid-structure transient gust response sensitivity for a nonlinear joined wing model In: 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures structural dynamics, and materials conference, Orlando
Marchman JF (1999) Panel: a “smith-hess” type of 2-d panel code combining source panels and vortices for a single-element, lifting airfoil in incompressible flow. Virginia Tech. http://www.dept.aoe.vt.edu/marchman/software/index.html
Olhoff N, Taylor JE (1983) On structural optimization. J Appl Mech 50(4):1139–1151
Reddy JN (2006) An introduction to nonlinear finite element analysis. McGraw-Hill series in mechanical engineering. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York
Squire W, Trapp G (1998) Using complex variables to estimate derivatives of real functions. SIAM Review 40(1):110–112
Stanley LGD, Stewart D (2002) Design sensitivity analysis: computational issues of sensitivity equation methods. Academic Press, Philadelphia
Tortorelli D, Michaleris P (1994) Design sensitivity analysis: overview and review. Inverse Probl Eng 1(1):71–105
Turgeon E, Pelletier D, Borggaard J (1999) A continuous sensitivity equation approach to optimal design in mixed convection. AIAA 99–3625
Wickert DP, Canfield RA, Reddy JN (2009) Fluid-structure transient gust sensitivity using least-squares continuous sensitivity analysis. In: 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. AIAA-2008-1821, Palm Springs
Yang RJ, Botkin ME (1986) The relationship between the variational approach and the implicit differentiation approach to shape design sensitivities. In: Bennett JA, Botkin ME (eds) The optimum shape: automated structural design Plenum press, New York, pp 61–77