Epigenetic control of neural precursor cell fate during development
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Hirabayashi, Y. & Gotoh, Y. Stage-dependent fate determination of neural precursor cells in mouse forebrain. Neurosci. Res. 51, 331–336 (2005).
Molyneaux, B. J., Arlotta, P., Menezes, J. R. & Macklis, J. D. Neuronal subtype specification in the cerebral cortex. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 8, 427–437 (2007).
Frantz, G. D. & McConnell, S. K. Restriction of late cerebral cortical progenitors to an upper-layer fate. Neuron 17, 55–61 (1996). This study showed that, late in development, neocortical NPCs lose the capacity to generate neurons that are normally generated at an earlier stage, possibly owing to a cell-intrinsic mechanism.
Desai, A. R. & McConnell, S. K. Progressive restriction in fate potential by neural progenitors during cerebral cortical development. Development 127, 2863–2872 (2000).
Yoo, A. S. & Crabtree, G. R. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling in neural development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 19, 120–126 (2009).
Borrelli, E., Nestler, E. J., Allis, C. D. & Sassone-Corsi, P. Decoding the epigenetic language of neuronal plasticity. Neuron 60, 961–974 (2008).
Mehler, M. F. Epigenetic principles and mechanisms underlying nervous system functions in health and disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 86, 305–341 (2008).
Copray, S., Huynh, J. L., Sher, F., Casaccia-Bonnefil, P. & Boddeke, E. Epigenetic mechanisms facilitating oligodendrocyte development, maturation, and aging. Glia 57, 1579–1587 (2009).
Boyer, L. A. et al. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441, 349–353 (2006).
Lee, T. I. et al. Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 301–313 (2006). References 11 and 12 identified a large set of PcG target genes, which are enriched for genes that control development and transcription in ESCs. See also reference 105.
Ku, M. et al. Genomewide analysis of PRC1 and PRC2 occupancy identifies two classes of bivalent domains. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000242 (2008).
Endoh, M. et al. Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B are functionally linked to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry to maintain ES cell identity. Development 135, 1513–1524 (2008).
Azuara, V. et al. Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 532–538 (2006).
Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315–326 (2006). References 15 and 16 showed that key genes for development are poised for activation in ESCs by the combination of histone modifications H3K27me3 and H3K4me3.
Zhao, X. D. et al. Whole-genome mapping of histone H3 Lys4 and 27 trimethylations reveals distinct genomic compartments in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 1, 286–298 (2007).
Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553–560 (2007). This study used ChIP–seq technology to describe the genome-wide histone modification state of mouse ESCs, NPCs and embryonic fibroblasts.
Mohn, F. et al. Lineage-specific polycomb targets and de novo DNA methylation define restriction and potential of neuronal progenitors. Mol. Cell 30, 755–766 (2008). An important study tracking genome-wide epigenetic modification by PcG proteins and DNA methylation during differentiation of ESCs to neural progenitors and to terminally differentiated neurons.
Meissner, A. et al. Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature 454, 766–770 (2008). This study provided the first genome-wide DNA methylation profile at nucleotide resolution in ESCs, ESC-derived NPCs and other primary tissues.
Fouse, S. D. et al. Promoter CpG methylation contributes to ES cell gene regulation in parallel with Oct4/Nanog, PcG complex, and histone H3 K4/K27 trimethylation. Cell Stem Cell 2, 160–169 (2008).
Lister, R. et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 462, 315–322 (2009).
Chong, J. A. et al. REST: a mammalian silencer protein that restricts sodium channel gene expression to neurons. Cell 80, 949–957 (1995).
Schoenherr, C. J. & Anderson, D. J. The neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF): a coordinate repressor of multiple neuron-specific genes. Science 267, 1360–1363 (1995).
Lunyak, V. V. et al. Corepressor-dependent silencing of chromosomal regions encoding neuronal genes. Science 298, 1747–1752 (2002).
Ballas, N. & Mandel, G. The many faces of REST oversee epigenetic programming of neuronal genes. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 500–506 (2005).
Ballas, N., Grunseich, C., Lu, D. D., Speh, J. C. & Mandel, G. REST and its corepressors mediate plasticity of neuronal gene chromatin throughout neurogenesis. Cell 121, 645–657 (2005). This study showed the roles of REST in long-term repression in terminally differentiated fibroblasts and in short-term repression in ESCs or neural progenitors.
Singh, S. K., Kagalwala, M. N., Parker-Thornburg, J., Adams, H. & Majumder, S. REST maintains self-renewal and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 453, 223–227 (2008).
Jorgensen, H. F. et al. REST selectively represses a subset of RE1-containing neuronal genes in mouse embryonic stem cells. Development 136, 715–721 (2009).
Boyer, L. A. et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 122, 947–956 (2005).
Loh, Y. H. et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet. 38, 431–440 (2006).
Jørgensen, H. F., Chen, Z. F., Merkenschlager, M. & Fisher, A. G. Is REST required for ESC pluripotency? Nature 457, E4–E5; discussion E7 (2009).
Buckley, N. J., Johnson, R., Sun, Y. M. & Stanton, L. W. Is REST a regulator of pluripotency? Nature 457, E5–E6; discussion E7 (2009).
Johnson, R. et al. REST regulates distinct transcriptional networks in embryonic and neural stem cells. PLoS Biol. 6, e256 (2008).
Shi, Y. et al. Coordinated histone modifications mediated by a CtBP co-repressor complex. Nature 422, 735–738 (2003).
Roopra, A., Qazi, R., Schoenike, B., Daley, T. J. & Morrison, J. F. Localized domains of G9a-mediated histone methylation are required for silencing of neuronal genes. Mol. Cell 14, 727–738 (2004).
Tahiliani, M. et al. The histone H3K4 demethylase SMCX links REST target genes to X-linked mental retardation. Nature 447, 601–605 (2007).
Iwase, S. et al. The X-linked mental retardation gene SMCX/JARID1C defines a family of histone H3 lysine 4 demethylases. Cell 128, 1077–1088 (2007).
Reik, W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature 447, 425–432 (2007).
Schoeftner, S. & Blasco, M. A. A 'higher order' of telomere regulation: telomere heterochromatin and telomeric RNAs. EMBO J. 28, 2323–2336 (2009).
Burgold, T. et al. The histone H3 lysine 27-specific demethylase Jmjd3 is required for neural commitment. PLoS ONE 3, e3034 (2008).
Lee, E. R., Murdoch, F. E. & Fritsch, M. K. High histone acetylation and decreased polycomb repressive complex 2 member levels regulate gene specific transcriptional changes during early embryonic stem cell differentiation induced by retinoic acid. Stem Cells 25, 2191–2199 (2007).
Hirabayashi, Y. et al. Polycomb limits the neurogenic competence of neural precursor cells to promote astrogenic fate transition. Neuron 63, 600–613 (2009). This paper shows that PcG proteins restrict the neurogenic potential of NPCs in the late stage of neocortical development and cause the developmental-stage-dependent fate switch.
Golebiewska, A., Atkinson, S. P., Lako, M. & Armstrong, L. Epigenetic landscaping during hESC differentiation to neural cells. Stem Cells 27, 1298–1308 (2009).
Wen, B., Wu, H., Shinkai, Y., Irizarry, R. A. & Feinberg, A. P. Large histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylated chromatin blocks distinguish differentiated from embryonic stem cells. Nature Genetics 41, 246–250 (2009).
Westbrook, T. F. et al. SCFβ-TRCP controls oncogenic transformation and neural differentiation through REST degradation. Nature 452, 370–374 (2008).
Ringrose, L. & Paro, R. Polycomb/Trithorax response elements and epigenetic memory of cell identity. Development 134, 223–232 (2007).
Schuettengruber, B. & Cavalli, G. Recruitment of polycomb group complexes and their role in the dynamic regulation of cell fate choice. Development 136, 3531–3542 (2009).
Sing, A. et al. A vertebrate Polycomb response element governs segmentation of the posterior hindbrain. Cell 138, 885–897 (2009).
Woo, C. J., Kharchenko, P. V., Daheron, L., Park, P. J. & Kingston, R. E. A region of the human HOXD cluster that confers polycomb-group responsiveness. Cell 140, 99–110 (2010).
Lan, F., Nottke, A. C. & Shi, Y. Mechanisms involved in the regulation of histone lysine demethylases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20, 316–325 (2008).
Ma, D. K., Guo, J. U., Ming, G. L. & Song, H. DNA excision repair proteins and Gadd45 as molecular players for active DNA demethylation. Cell Cycle 8, 1526–1531 (2009).
Walsh, C. & Cepko, C. L. Widespread dispersion of neuronal clones across functional regions of the cerebral cortex. Science 255, 434–440 (1992).
Noctor, S. C., Martinez-Cerdeno, V. & Kriegstein, A. R. Distinct behaviors of neural stem and progenitor cells underlie cortical neurogenesis. J. Comp. Neurol. 508, 28–44 (2008).
Costa, M. R., Bucholz, O., Schroeder, T. & Gotz, M. Late origin of glia-restricted progenitors in the developing mouse cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 19, i135–i143 (2009).
Qian, X. et al. Timing of CNS cell generation: a programmed sequence of neuron and glial cell production from isolated murine cortical stem cells. Neuron 28, 69–80 (2000).
Shen, Q. et al. The timing of cortical neurogenesis is encoded within lineages of individual progenitor cells. Nature Neurosci. 9, 743–751 (2006). References 56 and 57 show that isolated mouse cortical stem cells grown in clonal cultures recapitulated the sequential generation of early-born neurons, late-born neurons and glia that is observed in vivo .
Mizutani, K. & Saito, T. Progenitors resume generating neurons after temporary inhibition of neurogenesis by Notch activation in the mammalian cerebral cortex. Development 132, 1295–1304 (2005).
McConnell, S. K. & Kaznowski, C. E. Cell cycle dependence of laminar determination in developing neocortex. Science 254, 282–285 (1991).
Rajan, P. & McKay, R. D. Multiple routes to astrocytic differentiation in the CNS. J. Neurosci. 18, 3620–3629 (1998).
Johe, K. K., Hazel, T. G., Muller, T., Dugich-Djordjevic, M. M. & McKay, R. D. Single factors direct the differentiation of stem cells from the fetal and adult central nervous system. Genes Dev. 10, 3129–3140 (1996). The authors established an in vitro system to culture NPCs and identified extracellular factors that direct lineage commitment, enabling analysis of the differentiation capacity of a given NPC.
He, F. et al. A positive autoregulatory loop of Jak–STAT signaling controls the onset of astrogliogenesis. Nature Neurosci. 8, 616–625 (2005).
Bonni, A. et al. Regulation of gliogenesis in the central nervous system by the JAK–STAT signaling pathway. Science 278, 477–483 (1997).
Barnabe-Heider, F. et al. Evidence that embryonic neurons regulate the onset of cortical gliogenesis via cardiotrophin-1. Neuron 48, 253–265 (2005).
Yoshimatsu, T. et al. Non-cell-autonomous action of STAT3 in maintenance of neural precursor cells in the mouse neocortex. Development 133, 2553–2563 (2006).
Derouet, D. et al. Neuropoietin, a new IL-6-related cytokine signaling through the ciliary neurotrophic factor receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4827–4832 (2004).
Uemura, A. et al. Cardiotrophin-like cytokine induces astrocyte differentiation of fetal neuroepithelial cells via activation of STAT3. Cytokine 18, 1–7 (2002).
Song, M. R. & Ghosh, A. FGF2-induced chromatin remodeling regulates CNTF-mediated gene expression and astrocyte differentiation. Nature Neurosci. 7, 229–235 (2004).
Takizawa, T. et al. DNA methylation is a critical cell-intrinsic determinant of astrocyte differentiation in the fetal brain. Dev. Cell 1, 749–758 (2001).
Molne, M. et al. Early cortical precursors do not undergo LIF-mediated astrocytic differentiation. J. Neurosci. Res. 59, 301–311 (2000).
Fan, G. et al. DNA methylation controls the timing of astrogliogenesis through regulation of JAK–STAT signaling. Development 132, 3345–3356 (2005). References 69 and 71 showed that DNA methylation at gene regulatory elements of GFAP and JAK–STAT pathway components block astrocytic differentiation in early neocortical development.
Namihira, M., Nakashima, K. & Taga, T. Developmental stage dependent regulation of DNA methylation and chromatin modification in a immature astrocyte specific gene promoter. FEBS Lett. 572, 184–188 (2004).
Teter, B., Finch, C. E. & Condorelli, D. F. DNA methylation in the glial fibrillary acidic protein gene: map of CpG methylation sites and summary of analysis by restriction enzymes and by LMPCR. J. Neurosci. Res. 39, 708–709 (1994).
Namihira, M. et al. Committed neuronal precursors confer astrocytic potential on residual neural precursor cells. Dev. Cell 16, 245–255 (2009).
Naka, H., Nakamura, S., Shimazaki, T. & Okano, H. Requirement for COUP-TFI and II in the temporal specification of neural stem cells in CNS development. Nature Neurosci. 11, 1014–1023 (2008).
Setoguchi, H. et al. Methyl-CpG binding proteins are involved in restricting differentiation plasticity in neurons. J. Neurosci. Res. 84, 969–979 (2006).
Kohyama, J. et al. Epigenetic regulation of neural cell differentiation plasticity in the adult mammalian brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18012–18017 (2008).
Hirabayashi, Y. et al. The Wnt/β-catenin pathway directs neuronal differentiation of cortical neural precursor cells. Development 131, 2791–2801 (2004).
Muroyama, Y., Kondoh, H. & Takada, S. Wnt proteins promote neuronal differentiation in neural stem cell culture. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 313, 915–921 (2004).
Israsena, N., Hu, M., Fu, W., Kan, L. & Kessler, J. A. The presence of FGF2 signaling determines whether β-catenin exerts effects on proliferation or neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells. Dev. Biol. 268, 220–231 (2004).
Zhou, C. J., Borello, U., Rubenstein, J. L. & Pleasure, S. J. Neuronal production and precursor proliferation defects in the neocortex of mice with loss of function in the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Neuroscience 142, 1119–1131 (2006).
Lyu, J., Yamamoto, V. & Lu, W. Cleavage of the Wnt receptor Ryk regulates neuronal differentiation during cortical neurogenesis. Dev. Cell 15, 773–780 (2008).
Ivaniutsin, U., Chen, Y., Mason, J. O., Price, D. J. & Pratt, T. Adenomatous polyposis coli is required for early events in the normal growth and differentiation of the developing cerebral cortex. Neural Dev. 4, 3 (2009).
Guillemot, F. Cell fate specification in the mammalian telencephalon. Prog. Neurobiol. 83, 37–52 (2007).
Guillemot, F. Cellular and molecular control of neurogenesis in the mammalian telencephalon. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17, 639–647 (2005).
Sun, Y. et al. Neurogenin promotes neurogenesis and inhibits glial differentiation by independent mechanisms. Cell 104, 365–376 (2001).
Roman-Trufero, M. et al. Maintenance of undifferentiated state and self-renewal of embryonic neural stem cells by Polycomb protein Ring1B. Stem Cells 27, 1559–1570 (2009).
Molofsky, A. V. et al. Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation. Nature 425, 962–967 (2003).
Fasano, C. A. et al. shRNA knockdown of Bmi-1 reveals a critical role for p21-Rb pathway in NSC self-renewal during development. Cell Stem Cell 1, 87–99 (2007).
He, S. et al. Bmi-1 over-expression in neural stem/progenitor cells increases proliferation and neurogenesis in culture but has little effect on these functions in vivo. Dev. Biol. 328, 257–272 (2009).
Fasano, C. A. et al. Bmi-1 cooperates with Foxg1 to maintain neural stem cell self-renewal in the forebrain. Genes Dev. 23, 561–574 (2009).
Lessard, J. et al. Functional antagonism of the Polycomb-Group genes eed and Bmi1 in hemopoietic cell proliferation. Genes Dev. 13, 2691–2703 (1999).
Pietersen, A. M. et al. EZH2 and BMI1 inversely correlate with prognosis and TP53 mutation in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 10, R109 (2008).
Kessaris, N. et al. Competing waves of oligodendrocytes in the forebrain and postnatal elimination of an embryonic lineage. Nature Neurosci. 9, 173–179 (2006).
Petryniak, M. A., Potter, G. B., Rowitch, D. H. & Rubenstein, J. L. Dlx1 and Dlx2 control neuronal versus oligodendroglial cell fate acquisition in the developing forebrain. Neuron 55, 417–433 (2007).
Lim, D. A. et al. Chromatin remodelling factor Mll1 is essential for neurogenesis from postnatal neural stem cells. Nature 458, 529–533 (2009). This work showed that the TrxG member MLL is required for resolution of the bivalent state of the Dlx2 locus and for neurogenesis in the postnatal brain.
Sher, F. et al. Differentiation of neural stem cells into oligodendrocytes: involvement of the polycomb group protein Ezh2. Stem Cells 26, 2875–2883 (2008).
Barres, B. A., Lazar, M. A. & Raff, M. C. A novel role for thyroid hormone, glucocorticoids and retinoic acid in timing oligodendrocyte development. Development 120, 1097–1108 (1994).
Mabie, P. C. et al. Bone morphogenetic proteins induce astroglial differentiation of oligodendroglial-astroglial progenitor cells. J. Neurosci. 17, 4112–4120 (1997).
Kondo, T. & Raff, M. Oligodendrocyte precursor cells reprogrammed to become multipotential CNS stem cells. Science 289, 1754–1757 (2000).
Kondo, T. & Raff, M. Chromatin remodeling and histone modification in the conversion of oligodendrocyte precursors to neural stem cells. Genes Dev. 18, 2963–2972 (2004). References 100 and 101 showed that chromatin remodelling is involved in the reprogramming of lineage-committed oligodendrocytes into multipotent NPCs.
Lyssiotis, C. A. et al. Inhibition of histone deacetylase activity induces developmental plasticity in oligodendrocyte precursor cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 14982–14987 (2007).
Liu, A. et al. The glial or neuronal fate choice of oligodendrocyte progenitors is modulated by their ability to acquire an epigenetic memory. J. Neurosci. 27, 7339–7343 (2007).
Margueron, R. et al. Role of the polycomb protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks. Nature 461, 762–767 (2009).
Bracken, A. P., Dietrich, N., Pasini, D., Hansen, K. H. & Helin, K. Genome-wide mapping of Polycomb target genes unravels their roles in cell fate transitions. Genes Dev. 20, 1123–1136 (2006).
Schwartz, Y. B. & Pirrotta, V. Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 9–22 (2007).
Maherali, N. et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1, 55–70 (2007).
Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 454, 49–55 (2008). This study describes gene expression profiling and chromatin-state maps of fully and partially reprogrammed cell lines; treatment with DNMT inhibitors was found to improve the efficiency of reprogramming.
Gurdon, J. B. The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 10, 622–640 (1962).
Hochedlinger, K. & Plath, K. Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency. Development 136, 509–523 (2009).
Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).
Okita, K., Ichisaka, T. & Yamanaka, S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448, 313–317 (2007).
Stadtfeld, M., Brennand, K. & Hochedlinger, K. Reprogramming of pancreatic beta cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. Curr. Biol. 18, 890–894 (2008).
Kim, J. B. et al. Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors. Nature 454, 646–650 (2008).
Kim, J. B. et al. Direct reprogramming of human neural stem cells by OCT4. Nature 461, 649–653 (2009).
Hester, M. E. et al. Two factor reprogramming of human neural stem cells into pluripotency. PLoS ONE 4, e7044 (2009).
Vierbuchen, T. et al. Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors. Nature 463, 1035–1041 (2010).
Shi, Y. et al. A combined chemical and genetic approach for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2, 525–528 (2008).
Huangfu, D. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds. Nature Biotech. 26, 795–797 (2008).
Trojer, P. & Reinberg, D. Facultative heterochromatin: is there a distinctive molecular signature? Mol. Cell 28, 1–13 (2007).
Li, E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 662–673 (2002).
Barreto, G. et al. Gadd45a promotes epigenetic gene activation by repair-mediated DNA demethylation. Nature 445, 671–675 (2007).
Rai, K. et al. DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and Gadd45. Cell 135, 1201–1212 (2008).
Martin, C. & Zhang, Y. The diverse functions of histone lysine methylation. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 838–849 (2005).
Tachibana, M. et al. G9a histone methyltransferase plays a dominant role in euchromatic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and is essential for early embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 16, 1779–1791 (2002).
Rice, J. C. et al. Histone methyltransferases direct different degrees of methylation to define distinct chromatin domains. Mol. Cell 12, 1591–1598 (2003).
Loyola, A. et al. The HP1α–CAF1–SetDB1-containing complex provides H3K9me1 for Suv39-mediated K9me3 in pericentric heterochromatin. EMBO Rep. 10, 769–775 (2009).
Epsztejn-Litman, S. et al. De novo DNA methylation promoted by G9a prevents reprogramming of embryonically silenced genes. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 1176–1183 (2008).
Peters, A. H. et al. Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability. Cell 107, 323–337 (2001).
Klose, R. J. & Zhang, Y. Regulation of histone methylation by demethylimination and demethylation. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 307–318 (2007).
Whetstine, J. R. et al. Reversal of histone lysine trimethylation by the JMJD2 family of histone demethylases. Cell 125, 467–481 (2006).
Fodor, B. D. et al. Jmjd2b antagonizes H3K9 trimethylation at pericentric heterochromatin in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 20, 1557–1562 (2006).
Nottke, A., Colaiacovo, M. P. & Shi, Y. Developmental roles of the histone lysine demethylases. Development 136, 879–889 (2009).
Wissmann, M. et al. Cooperative demethylation by JMJD2C and LSD1 promotes androgen receptor-dependent gene expression. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 347–353 (2007).
Cao, R. & Zhang, Y. The functions of E(Z)/EZH2-mediated methylation of lysine 27 in histone H3. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14, 155–164 (2004).
Shen, X. et al. EZH1 mediates methylation on histone H3 lysine 27 and complements EZH2 in maintaining stem cell identity and executing pluripotency. Mol. Cell 32, 491–502 (2008).
Kalantry, S. et al. The Polycomb group protein Eed protects the inactive X-chromosome from differentiation-induced reactivation. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 195–202 (2006).
Umlauf, D. et al. Imprinting along the Kcnq1 domain on mouse chromosome 7 involves repressive histone methylation and recruitment of Polycomb group complexes. Nature Genet. 36, 1296–1300 (2004).
Mager, J., Montgomery, N. D., de Villena, F. P. & Magnuson, T. Genome imprinting regulated by the mouse Polycomb group protein Eed. Nature Genet. 33, 502–507 (2003).
van Driel, R., Fransz, P. F. & Verschure, P. J. The eukaryotic genome: a system regulated at different hierarchical levels. J. Cell Sci. 116, 4067–4075 (2003).
Misteli, T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 128, 787–800 (2007).
Williams, R. R. et al. Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of the Mash1 locus. J. Cell Sci. 119, 132–140 (2006).
Kosak, S. T. & Groudine, M. Form follows function: the genomic organization of cellular differentiation. Genes Dev. 18, 1371–1384 (2004).
Perry, P. et al. A dynamic switch in the replication timing of key regulator genes in embryonic stem cells upon neural induction. Cell Cycle 3, 1645–1650 (2004).
Hiratani, I., Takebayashi, S., Lu, J. & Gilbert, D. M. Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect — part II. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 19, 142–149 (2009).
Hiratani, I. et al. Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS Biol. 6, e245 (2008).
Efroni, S. et al. Global transcription in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2, 437–447 (2008).
Meshorer, E. et al. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev. Cell 10, 105–116 (2006).
Gaspar-Maia, A. et al. Chd1 regulates open chromatin and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 460, 863–868 (2009).
Lee, S. & Lee, S. K. Crucial roles of histone-modifying enzymes in mediating neural cell-type specification. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 20, 29–36 (2010).
Shahbazian, M. D. & Grunstein, M. Functions of site-specific histone acetylation and deacetylation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 75–100 (2007).
Hsieh, J., Nakashima, K., Kuwabara, T., Mejia, E. & Gage, F. H. Histone deacetylase inhibition-mediated neuronal differentiation of multipotent adult neural progenitor cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16659–16664 (2004).
Yu, I. T. et al. Valproic acid promotes neuronal differentiation by induction of proneural factors in association with H4 acetylation. Neuropharmacology 56, 473–480 (2009).
Montgomery, R. L., Hsieh, J., Barbosa, A. C., Richardson, J. A. & Olson, E. N. Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 control the progression of neural precursors to neurons during brain development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7876–7881 (2009).
Shaked, M. et al. Histone deacetylases control neurogenesis in embryonic brain by inhibition of BMP2/4 signaling. PLoS ONE 3, e2668 (2008).
Koyano-Nakagawa, N., Wettstein, D. & Kintner, C. Activation of Xenopus genes required for lateral inhibition and neuronal differentiation during primary neurogenesis. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 14, 327–339 (1999).
Lee, S., Lee, B., Lee, J. W. & Lee, S. K. Retinoid signaling and Neurogenin2 function are coupled for the specification of spinal motor neurons through a chromatin modifier CBP. Neuron 62, 641–654 (2009).
Nakashima, K. et al. Synergistic signaling in fetal brain by STAT3–Smad1 complex bridged by p300. Science 284, 479–482 (1999).
Jepsen, K. et al. SMRT-mediated repression of an H3K27 demethylase in progression from neural stem cell to neuron. Nature 450, 415–419 (2007).
Hermanson, O., Jepsen, K. & Rosenfeld, M. G. N-CoR controls differentiation of neural stem cells into astrocytes. Nature 419, 934–939 (2002).
Clapier, C. R. & Cairns, B. R. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 273–304 (2009).
Seo, S., Richardson, G. A. & Kroll, K. L. The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling protein Brg1 is required for vertebrate neurogenesis and mediates transactivation of Ngn and NeuroD. Development 132, 105–115 (2005).
Lessard, J. et al. An essential switch in subunit composition of a chromatin remodeling complex during neural development. Neuron 55, 201–215 (2007).
Waddington, C. H. The Strategy of the Genes. (Allen and Unwin, London, 1957).
Tzouanacou, E., Wegener, A., Wymeersch, F. J., Wilson, V. & Nicolas, J. F. Redefining the progression of lineage segregations during mammalian embryogenesis by clonal analysis. Dev. Cell 17, 365–376 (2009).
Yuan, P. et al. Eset partners with Oct4 to restrict extraembryonic trophoblast lineage potential in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 23, 2507–2520 (2009).