Environmental tax and productivity in a decentralized context: new findings on the Porter hypothesis
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Albrecht, J. A. E. (1998). Environmental regulation, comparative advantage and the Porter hypothesis, FEEM Working Paper 59.
Alpay, E., Buccola, S., & Kerkvliet, J. (2002). Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(4), 887–901.
Ambec, S., & Barla, P. (2006). Can environmental regulations be good for business? An assessment of the Porter hypothesis. Energy Studies Review, 14(2), 42–62.
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification with panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and a application to employment equations. Review of Economics Studies, 58, 277–297.
Barberá, A., & McConnell, V. (1990). The impact of environmental regulation on industrial productivity: Direct and indirect effects. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18, 50–65.
Barberán, R., Costa, A., & Alegre, A. (2008). Los costes de los servicios urbanos del agua. Un análisis necesario para el establecimiento y control de tarifas. Hacienda Pública Española/Revista de Economía Pública, 186((3/2008)), 123–155.
Berman, E., & Bui, L. T. M. (2001). Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries. Review of Economic and Statistics, 83(3), 498–510.
Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2004). The effect of health on economic growth: A production function approach. World Development, 32, 1–13.
Bosquet, B. (2000). Environmental tax reform: Does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 34, 10–32.
Bovenberg, A. (1999). Green tax reform’s and the double dividend: An updated reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 6, 421–443.
Boyd, G. A., & McClelland, J. D. (1999). The impact of environmental constraints on productivity improvement in integrated paper plants. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38, 121–142.
Brännlund, R. (2008). Productivity and environment regulations. Umea Economic Studies, 728. http://www.jus.umu.se/digitalAssets/8/8214_ues728.pdf .
Brännlund, R., Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1995). Environmental regulation and profitability: An application to Swedish pulp and paper mills. Environmenmtal and Resource Economics, 6, 23–36.
Brännlund, R., & Liljas, B. (1993). The effects of emission standards: The case of the Swedish pulp and paper industry. Umea Economic Studies, 320, 1–25.
Brännlund, R., & Lundgren, T. (2009). Environmental policy without costs? A review of the Porter hypothesis. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 3, 75–117.
Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1980). The power to tax. Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brunneheimer, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 278–293.
Carrera, A. (2008). Environmental taxes in OECD countries: Recent developments. Intertax, 12, 554–567.
Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L. L., Espasa, M., & Mora, T. (2007). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in Spain. Public Finance Review, 36(2), 194–218.
Cohen, M. A. (1997). Firm response to environmental regulation and environmental pressures. Managerial and Decision Economics, 18(6), 417–420.
Dalmazone, S. (2006). Decentralization and the environment. In E. Ahmad & G. Brosio (Eds.), Handbook of fiscal federalism (pp. 459–477). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Dasgupta, S., & Laplante, B. (2001). Pollution and capital markets in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42, 310–345.
De Vries, F. P., & Withagen, C. (2005). Innovation and environment strigency: The case of sulfur dioxide abatement, Discusión Paper 18. Center, Tilburg University.
Dufour, C., Lanoie, P., & Patry, M. (1998). Regulation and productivity. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9, 233–247.
Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (2002). Tropics, germs, and crops: How endowments influence economic development. Journal of Development Economics, 39, 31–57.
Faucheux, S., Nicolai, I., & O’Connor, M. (1998). Globalization, competitiveness, governance and environment: What prospects or a sustainable development? In S. Faucheux, J. Gowdy, & I. Nicolaï (Eds.), Sustainability and firms: Technological change and the changing regulatory environment (pp. 13–40). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Feichtinger, G., Hartl, R. F., Kort, P. M., & Veliov, V. M. (2005). Environmental policy, the Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital: Effects of learning and technological progress. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50, 434–446.
Filbeck, G., & Gorman, R. F. (2004). The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environmental & Resource Economics, 29, 137–157.
Fisman, R., & Love, I. (2004). Financial development and the composition of industrial growth, NBER Working Paper 9583. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
Fredriksson, P. G., Matschke, X., & Minier, J. (2010). Environmental policy in majoritarian systems. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(2), 177–191.
Fuente, A., & Doménech, R. (2006). Capital humano, crecimiento y desigualdad en las regiones españolas. Moneda y Crédito, 222, 13–78.
Gago, A., & Labandeira, X. (1999). La Reforma Fiscal Verde: Teoría y Práctica de la Imposición Ambiental. Madrid: Mundi Prensa.
Gago, A., Labandeira, X., Picos, F., & Rodriguez, M. (2007). Environmental taxes in Spain: A missed opportunity. In J. Martínez-Vazquez & F. Sanz (Eds.), Fiscal reform in Spain accomplishments and challenges (pp. 403–421). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Galán, J. I. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and strategic management. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1629–1641.
García, M. A. (2005). Fijación de precios para el servicio municipal de suministro de agua: Un ejercicio de análisis de bienestar. Hacienda Pública Española/Revista de Economía Pública, 172((1/2005)), 119–142.
Gil, R., & López Laborda, J. (2005). Modelling tax decentralisation and regional growth. Papeles de Trabajo del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, 14, 1–39. http://www.ief.es/documentos/recursos/publicaciones/papeles_trabajo/2005_14.pdf .
Gollop, F. M., & Roberts, M. J. (1983). Environmental regulations and productivity growth: The case of fossil-fuelled electric power generation. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 654–674.
Goulder, L. (1994). Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader’s guide, Working Paper 4896. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gray, W. B. (1987). The cost of regulation: OSHA, EPA and the productivity slowdown. American Economic Review, 77, 998–1006.
Gray, W. B., & Shadbegian, R. J. (1998). Environmental regulation investment timing, and technology choice. The Journal of Industrial Economics, XLVI, 235–256.
Gray, W. B., & Shadbegian, R. J. (2003). Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46, 384–402.
Greaker, M. (2006). Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: A new look at the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 52, 411–420.
Greenwood, J., Hercowitz, Z., & Krusell, P. (1997). Long-run implications of investmentspecific technological change. American Economic Review, 87, 342–362.
Griffith, R., & Harrison, R. (2004). The link between product market reforms and productivity: Direct and indirect impacts. The EU Economy: 2004 Review, Brussels.
Griffith, R., Harrison, R., & Simpson, H. (2006). The link between product market reform, innovation and EU macroeconomic performance, European Commission, Economic Papers 243.
Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen J. (2000). Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. IFS Working Paper W00/02.
Gual, J., Jodar, S., & Ruiz, A. (2006). El problema de la productividad en España: Cuál es el papel de la regulación? Documentos de economía “La Caixa” 01 (junio), Servicio de Estudios.
Gupta, S., & Goldar, B. (2005). Do stock markets penalize environment-unfriendly behaviour? Evidence from India. Ecological Economics, 52, 81–95.
Hall, B., & Kramarz, F. (1998). Effects of technology and innovation on firm performance, employment and wages. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5, 99–107.
Hamamoto, M. (2006). Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 28, 299–312.
Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50, 1029–1959.
Hercowitz, Z. (1998). The “embodiment” controversy: A review essay. Journal of Monetary Economics, 41, 217–224.
Hitchens, D., & Triebswetter, U. (2005). The impact of environmental regulation on competitiveness in the German manufacturing industry—A comparison with other countries of the European Union- Results. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(7), 733–745.
Hoerner, J. A., & Bosquet, B. (2001). Environmental tax reform: The European experience. Washington, DC: Center for a Sustainable Economy.
Holcombe, R. G., & Sobel, R. S. (1995). Empirical evidence on the publicness of state legislative activities. Public Choice, 83(1–2), 47–58.
Isaksson, A. (2007). Determinants of total factor productivity: A literature review. Research and Statistics Branch, Staff Working Paper 2/2007. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).
Isaksson, A., & Ng, T. H. (2006). Determinants of productivity: Cross-country analysis and country case studies, Research and Statistics Branch, Staff Working Paper 1/2006. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).
Islam, N. (1995). Growth empirics: A panel data approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 1127–1170.
Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 610–619.
Lanoie P., Johnstone, N., Lucchetti, J., & Ambec, S. (2007). Environmental policy, innovation and performance: New insights on the Porter hypothesis. GAEL Working Paper 2007-07.
Jorgenson, D. W., & Wilcoxen, P. J. (1990). Environmental regulation and U.S. economic growth. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(2), 314–340.
Keller, W., Yeaple, S. R. (2003). Multinomial enterprises, international trade, and productivity growth: Firm-level evidence from the United States, NBER Working Paper 9504. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
Khanna, M., Quimio, W. R. H., & Bojilova, D. (1998). Toxic release information: A policy tool for environment protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36, 243–266.
King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Does it really pay to be green? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 105–116.
Lanoie, P., Patry, M., & Lajeunesse, R. (2001). Environmental regulation and productivity: New finding on the Porter analysis, CIRANO Working Paper 53.
Lanoie, P., Patry, M., & Lajeunesse, R. (2008). Environmental regulation and productivity: Testing the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30(2), 121–128.
Loayza, N. V., Oviedo, A. M., & Serven, L. (2005). Regulation and macroeconomic performance, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 10380.
López, T., Lara de Vicente, F., Fuentes, F., & Veroz, R. (2006). La reforma fiscal ecológica en la Unión Europea: Antecedentes, experiencias y propuestas. Revista de Economía Institucional, 8(15), 321–332.
López-Gúzman, T. (2004). Environmental taxes in Spain, Research Papers from the Department of Social Sciences, 4. Denmark: Roskilde University.
Lundgren, T., & Marklund, P.-O. (2010). Climate policy and profit efficiency, Working Paper 11. Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics. www.cere.se .
Lundgren, T., & Marklund, P.-O. (2012). Environmental performance and profits, Working Paper 8. Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics. www.cere.se .
Marklund, P.-O. (2003). Environmental regulation and firm efficiency: Studying the Porter hypothesis using a directional output distance function. Umea Economic Studies 619.
Martínez-Vázquez, J., & McNab, R. M. (2003). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World Development, 31, 1597–1616.
McWillams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.
Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. (2007). Precios y costes de los Servicios del Agua en España. Serie Monografías: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente.
Mohr, R. D. (2002). Technical change, external economies and the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43, 158–168.
Morrison, C. J. (1999). Unravelling the productivity growth slowdown in the United States, Canada, and Japan: The effects of subequilibrium, scale economies and markups. Review of Economics and Statistics, 74, 381–393.
Nelson, R. A., Tietenberg, T., & Donihue, M. R. (1993). Differential environmental regulation: Effects on electric utility capital turnover and emissions. The Review of Economic Statistics, 75, 368–373.
Nicoletti, G., & Scarpetta, S. (2003). Regulation, productivity and growth—OECD evidence. Economic Policy, 18(36), 9–72.
Nicoletti, G., & Scarpetta, S. (2005). Regulation and economic performance: Product market reforms and productivity in the OECD, Working Papers, no. ECO/WKP (2005)47, OECD Economic Department.
OECD. (1997a). Environmental performance reviews: Spain 1997. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1997b). The OECD report on regulatory reform (vol. II), thematic studies. Paris: OECD.
OMB-Office of Management and Budget. (1997, 1998 and 2000). Report to congress on the costs and benefits of federal regulations. Washington, DC: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
OMB-Office of Management and Budget. (2001). Making sense of regulation: Report to congress on the costs and benefits of federal regulations and unfunded mandates on state, local and tribal entities. Washington, DC: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
ORR-Office of Regulation Review. (1995–1996). Regulation and its review, Productivity Commission. Melbourne: Australian Government’s.
Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 119–132.
Pearce, D. (1991). The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming. Economic Journal, 101, 938–948.
Pérez, P., & Cantarero, D. (2009). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: Evidence from Spanish Regions. Public Budgeting & Finance, 29(4), 24–44.
Popp, D. (2005). Uncertain R&D and the Porter hypothesis. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 4(1). http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/contributions/vol4/iss1/art6/ .
Porter, M., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.
Rogers, J. R. (2005). The impact of divided government on legislative production. Public Choice, 123, 217–233.
Scarpetta, S., Bassanini, A., Pilat, D., & Schreyer, P. (2000). Economic growth in the OECD area: Recent trends at the aggregate and sectoral level, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 248.
Scarpetta, S., & Tressel, T. (2002). Productivity and convergence in a panel of OECD industries: Do regulations and institutions matter? OECD Economics Department Working Paper 342.
Schöb, R. (2003). The double dividend hypothesis of environmental taxes: A survey, FEEM Working Paper, 60.2003; CESifo Working Paper Series 946.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of the corporation in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Manegement Review, 20, 936–960.
Simpson, D., & Bradford, R. L. (1996). Taxing variable cost: Environmental regulation as industrial policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 282–300.
Smith, J. B., & Sims, W. A. (1985). The impact of pollution charges on productivity growth in Canadian Brewing. Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 410–423.
Telle, K., & Larsson, J. (2007). Do environmental regulations hamper productivity growth? How accounting for improvements of plants’ environmental performance can change the conclusion? Ecological Economics, 61, 438–445.
Urpelainen, J. (2010). Enforcing international environmental cooperation: Technological standards can help. The Review of International Organizations, 5(4), 475–496.
Vallés, J., & Zárate, A. (2012a). Fiscal devolution and green tax administration. Urban Public Economics Review, 16, 61–92.
Vallés, J., & Zárate, A. (2012b). The cost of regulation in a decentralized context: The case of the Spanish regions. European Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1), 185–203, Springer, Institute of Law and Economics, University of Hamburg, Germany.
Vallés, J., & Zárate, A. (2013). Environmental taxation and industrial water use in Spain. Investigaciones Regionales, 25, 1–20.
Van der Vlist, A. J., Withagen, C., & Folmer, H. (2007). Technical efficiency under alternative environmental regulatory regimes: The case of Dutch horticultura. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 165–173.
Volleberg, H. (2007). Differential impact of environmental policy instruments on technological change: A review of the empirical literature, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 42/3.
Wibe, S. (1990): Regleringsteori (regulatory theory), Working Report. Umea: Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.