Environmental impact of Danish pork—effect of allocation methods at slaughtering stage
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Basset-Mens C, Van Der Werf HMG (2005) Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105(1–2):127–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.05.007
Bonou A, Colley TA, Hauschild MZ, Olsen SI, Birkved M (2020) Life cycle assessment of Danish pork exports using different cooling technologies and comparison of upstream supply chain efficiencies between Denmark, China and Australia. J Clean Prod 244:118816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118816
BSI (2008) Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services
Cederberg C, Stadig M (2003) System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(6):350–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978508
Cederberg C, Wivstad M, Bergkvist P, Mattsson B, Ivarsson K (2005) Environmental assessment of plant protection strategies using scenarios for pig feed production. Ambio 34(4–5):408–413. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.408
Chen X, Wilfart A, Puillet L, Aubin J (2017) A new method of biophysical allocation in LCA of livestock co-products: modeling metabolic energy requirements of body-tissue growth. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(6):883–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1201-y
Cherubini E, Franco D, Zanghelini GM, Soares SR (2018) Uncertainty in LCA case study due to allocation approaches and life cycle impact assessment methods. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(10):2055–2070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1432-6
Cherubini E, Zanghelini GM, Alvarenga RAF, Franco D, Soares SR (2015) Life cycle assessment of swine production in Brazil: a comparison of four manure management systems. J Clean Prod 87(C):68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.035
Dalgaard R, Halberg N, Hermansen J (2007) Danish pork production: an environmental assessment. In DJF Animal Science (Vol. 82). Retrieved from http://www.agrsci.dk/djfpublikation/djfpdf/djfhus82ny.pdf
Danish Crown A/S (2021) Data tables for pig split up based on weight and economic value in 2015. Personal communication
Danish Ministry of Food Agriculture and Fisheries (2021) Vejledning om gødsknings- og harmoniregler. Retrieved from https://lbst.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/NaturErhverv/Filer/Landbrug/Goedningsregnskab/Vejledning_om_goedskning_og_harmoniregler_2021_2022.pdf
Dolman MA, Vrolijk HCJ, de Boer IJM (2012) Exploring variation in economic, environmental and societal performance among Dutch fattening pig farms. Livest Sci 149(1–2):143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.07.008
Dorca-Preda T, Mogensen L, Kristensen T, Knudsen MT (2021) Environmental impact of Danish pork at slaughterhouse gate – a life cycle assessment following biological and technological changes over a 10-year period. Livest Sci 251(July):104622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104622
Dourmad JY, Ryschawy J, Trousson T, Bonneau M, Gonzàlez J, Houwers HWJ, Mogensen L (2014) Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment. Animal 8(12):2027–2037. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114002134
EC (2017) PEFCR Guidance document - guidance for the development of Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCRs), version 6.2
EC (2018) Product environmental footprint category rules guidance. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/pdf/PEFCR_guidance_v6.3.pdf
EC (2022) Additional tools single market for green products initiative. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/
European Parliament and Council (2009) Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009. In Official Journal of the European Union (Vol. 300)
European Parliament and of the Council (2008) Directive 2008/122/EC. Off J Eur Union. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781782258674.0028
FAO (2018) Environmental performance of pig supply chains: guidelines for assessment (Version 1). In Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance Partnership. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-bl094e.pdf
Flysjö A, Cederberg C, Henriksson M, Ledgard S (2011) How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(5):420–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0283-9
Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Tempio G (2013) Reducing enteric methane and livelihoods Win - Win opportunities for farmers. In FAO
González-García S, Belo S, Dias AC, Rodrigues JV, Da Costa RR, Ferreira A, Arroja L (2015) Life cycle assessment of pigmeat production: Portuguese case study and proposal of improvement options. J Clean Prod 100:126–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.048
Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, Huijbregts MAJ (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Series: eco-efficiency in Industry and Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G (2004) Economic allocation: examples and derived decision tree. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(1):23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978533
Halberg N, Hermansen JE, Kristensen IS, Eriksen J, Tvedegaard N, Petersen BM (2010) Impact of organic pig production systems on CO2 emission, C sequestration and nitrate pollution. Agron Sustain Dev 30(4):721–731. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2010006
Ijassi W, Ben Rejeb H, Zwolinski P (2021) Environmental impact evaluation of co-products: decision-aid tool for allocation in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26(11):2199–2214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01984-0
IPCC (2014) 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas nventories: Wetlands. In: Hiraishi T, Krug T, Tanabe K, Srivastava N, Baasansuren J, Fukuda M, Troxler TG (eds) Published: IPCC, Switzerland
ISO (2006) ISO 14040: Environmental management - life cycle assessment - requirements and guidelines
ISO 14040 (1997) International standard 14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. Geneve
Jacobsen R, Vandermeulen V, Van Huylenbroeck G, Gellynck X (2014) Carbon footprint of pigmeat in Flanders. Int J Agric Sustain 12(1):54–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2013.798896
Johnson IR, France J, Thornley JHM, Bell MJ, Eckard RJ (2012) A generic model of growth, energy metabolism, and body composition for cattle and sheep. J Anim Sci 90(13):4741–4751. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-5053
Kristensen T, Mogensen L, Knudsen MT, Hermansen JE (2011) Effect of production system and farming strategy on greenhouse gas emissions from commercial dairy farms in a life cycle approach. Livest Sci 140(1–3):136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.002
Kyttä V, Roitto M, Astaptsev A, Saarinen M, Tuomisto HL (2021) Review and expert survey of allocation methods used in life cycle assessment of milk and beef. Int J Life Cycle Assess (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-02019-4
Liu H, Chen Y, Li Z, Li Y, Lai C, Piao X, Wang F (2019) Metabolizable energy requirement for maintenance estimated by regression analysis of body weight gain or metabolizable energy intake in growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 32(9):1397–1406. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0898
Marinussen M, Kool A (2010) Environmental impacts of synthetic amino acid production. In Blonk Milieu Advies BV. Retrieved from https://www.blonkconsultants.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/amino-acids.pdf
McAuliffe GA, Chapman DV, Sage CL (2016) A thematic review of life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to pig production. Environ Impact Assess Rev 56:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.08.008
Milgen JV, Bernier JF, Lecozler Y, Dubois S, Noblet J (1998) Major determinants of fasting heat production and energetic cost of activity in growing pigs of different body weight and breed/castration combination. Br J Nutr 79(6):509–517. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19980089
Mogensen L, Kristensen T, Nguyen TLT, Knudsen MT, Hermansen JE (2014) Method for calculating carbon footprint of cattle feeds - Including contribution from soil carbon changes and use of cattle manure. J Clean Prod 73:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.023
Mogensen L, Nguyen TLT, Madsen NT, Pontoppidan O, Preda T, Hermansen JE (2016) Environmental impact of beef sourced from different production systems - focus on the slaughtering stage: input and output. J Clean Prod 133:284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.105
Mogensen L, Trydeman MK, Dorca-Preda T, Nielsen NI, Kristensen IS, Kristensen T (2018) Bæredygtighedsparametre for konventionelle fodermidler til kvæg. Retrieved from https://dcapub.au.dk/djfpublikation/djfpdf/DCArapport116.pdf
Muscat A, de Olde EM, de Boer IJM, Ripoll-Bosch R (2020) The battle for biomass: a systematic review of food-feed-fuel competition. Glob Food Sec 25:100330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100330
Nguyen TLT, Hermansen JE, Mogensen L (2011) Environmental assessment of Danish pork. Retrieved from https://dcapub.au.dk/djfpublikation/djfpdf/ir_103_54761_indhold_internet.pdf
Olesen E, Nielsen PH (2003) Fishmeal and oil production (produktion af fiskemel og fiskeolie). Retrieved from LCA Food Database website: http://www.lcafood.dk/processes/industry/fishmealproduction.htm
Padalíková D, Ježková D (1984) Chemical composition of bodies and organs of pig fetuses in the last forty days of intrauterine life. Acta Vet Brno 53(1–2):19–30. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb198453010019
Pelletier N, Ardente F, Brandão M, De Camillis C, Pennington D (2015) Rationales for and limitations of preferred solutions for multi-functionality problems in LCA: is increased consistency possible? Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(1):74–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0812-4
Perez RO (2009) Analysis of sustainability in the pig production chain: life cycle assessment of contrasting scenarios. Dissertation, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne
Petersen BM, Knudsen MT, Hermansen JE, Halberg N (2013) An approach to include soil carbon changes in life cycle assessments. J Clean Prod 52:217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.007
Piech I (2021) Danish Crown A/S. Personal correspondence
Schmidt JH (2015) Life cycle assessment of five vegetable oils. J Clean Prod 87(C):130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.011
Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. In FAO, Rome
Stephen KL (2012) Life cycle assessment of UK pig production systems: the impact of dietary protein source. Dissertation, University of Edinburgh
Strudsholm F, Nielsen ES, Flye JC, Kjeldsen AM, Weisbjerg MR, Kristensen VF, Andersen HR, Hermansen J, Møller E (1995) Fodermiddeltabel, p 52
Svanes E, Vold M, Hanssen OJ (2011) Effect of different allocation methods on LCA results of products from wild-caught fish and on the use of such results. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(6):512–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0288-4
Thomassen MA, Dalgaard R, Heijungs R, De Boer I (2008) Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):339–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0007-y
Transport and Environment (2019) The trend worsens: more palm oil for energy, less for food. Retrieved from https://www.transportenvironment.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/finalpalmbriefing2019.pdf
Wellock IJ, Emmans GC, Kyriazakis I (2004) Describing and predicting potential growth in the pig. Anim Sci 78(3):379–388. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1357729800058781
Wilfart A (2020) MeatPartTool software. Retrieved from Portial Data INRAE website: https://data.inrae.fr/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.15454/AIMYFG
Wilfart A, Gac A, Salaün Y, Aubin J, Espagnol S (2021) Allocation in the LCA of meat products: is agreement possible? Cleaner Environmental Systems 2:100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100028
Willems J, Van Grinsven HJM, Jacobsen BH, Jensen T, Dalgaard T, Westhoek H, Kristensen IS (2016) Why Danish pig farms have far more land and pigs than Dutch farms? Implications for feed supply, manure recycling and production costs. Agric Syst 144:122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.02.002
Yuan J, Kendall A, Zhang Y (2015) Mass balance and life cycle assessment of biodiesel from microalgae incorporated with nutrient recycling options and technology uncertainties. GCB Bioenergy 7(6):1245–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12229