Đường cong Kuznets môi trường và sự mở cửa thương mại ở Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ: Phương pháp Bootstrap ARDL với sự đứt gãy cấu trúc

Acaravci A, Akalin G (2017) Environment–economic growth nexus: a comparative analysis of developed and developing countries. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7(5):34–43 Ahmed K, Long W (2013) Climate change and trade policy: from legal complications to time factor. J Int Trade Law Policy 12(3):258–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-02-2013-0003 Al Mamun M, Sohag K, Mia MAH, Uddin GS, Ozturk I (2014) Regional differences in the dynamic linkage between CO2 emissions, sectoral output and economic growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev 38:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.091 Aung TS, Saboori B, Rasoulinezhad E (2017) Economic growth and environmental pollution in Myanmar: an analysis of environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(25):20487–20501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9567-3 Ben Jebli M, Youssef SB (2015) The environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy, and trade in Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 47:173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.049 Bölük G, Mert M (2015) The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.138 Boutabba MA (2014) The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: evidence from the Indian economy. Econ Model 40:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.03.005 BP (2018) British petroleum statistical review of world energy. Accessed on 29th December, 2018 through the link https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/xlsx/energy-economics/statistical -review/bp-stats-review-2018-all-data.xlsx Brown RL, Durbin J, Evans JM (1975) Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 37(2):149–192 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2984889Accessed 14 Jan 2019 Bulut U (2019) Testing environmental Kuznets curve for the USA under a regime shift: the role of renewable energy. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04835-6 Cetin M, Ecevit E, Yucel AG (2018) The impact of economic growth, energy consumption, trade openness, and financial development on carbon emissions: empirical evidence from Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(36):36589–36603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3526-5 Chebbi HE, Olarreaga M, Zitouna H (2011) Trade openness and CO2 emissions in Tunisia. MEDJ 3(01):29–53. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793812011000314 Chen Y, Wang Z, Zhong Z (2019) CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China. Renew Energy 131:208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.047 Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Ivanovski K, Smyth R (2018) The Environmental Kuznets Curve in the OECD: 1870–2014. Energy Econ 75:389–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.09.004 Day KM, Grafton RQ (2003) Growth and the environment in Canada: an empirical analysis. Can J Agric Econ 51(2):197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2003.tb00173.x De Bruyn SM, van den Bergh JC, Opschoor JB (1998) Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecol Econ 25(2):161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00178-X Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017 Destek MA, Balli E, Manga M (2016) The relationship between CO2 emission, energy consumption, urbanization and trade openness for selected CEECs. Res World Econ 7(1):52–58. https://doi.org/10.5430/rwe.v7n1p52 Destek MA, Ulucak R, Dogan E (2018) Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(29):29387–29396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4 Dijkgraaf E, Vollebergh HR (2005) A test for parameter homogeneity in CO2 panel EKC estimations. Environ Resour Econ 32(2):229–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-2776-0 Dogan E, Seker F (2016) An investigation on the determinants of carbon emissions for OECD countries: empirical evidence from panel models robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(14):14646–14655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6632-2 Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5323-8 Efron G (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7(1):1–26 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2958830 Enders W, Jones P (2016) Grain prices, oil prices, and multiple smooth breaks in a VAR. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econ 20(4):399–419. https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2014-0101 Ertugrul HM, Cetin M, Seker F, Dogan E (2016) The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries. Ecol Indic 67:543–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.027 Fang X, Wei B, Wang Y (2012) Impacts of inter-sectoral trade on carbon emissions—a case of China in 2007. Front Environ Sci Eng 6(3):387–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0396-9 Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(20):15663–15676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4767-1 Farhani S, Chaibi A, Rault C (2014) CO2 emissions, output, energy consumption, and trade in Tunisia. Econ Model 38:426–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.01.025 Goh SK, Sam CY, McNown R (2017) Re-examining foreign direct investment, exports, and economic growth in Asian economies using a bootstrap ARDL test for cointegration. J Asian Econ 51:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.06.001 Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N (2018) Testing the agriculture-induced EKC hypothesis: the case of Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(23):22829–22841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2330-6 Granger CW (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: J Econ Soc 37(3):424–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791 Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research Halicioglu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37(3):1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.012 Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) The role of renewable versus non-renewable energy to the level of CO2 emissions a panel analysis of sub-Saharan Africa’s Βig 10 electricity generators. Renew Energy 123:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.041 Jalil A, Mahmud SF (2009) Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy 37(12):5167–5172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.044 Jayanthakumaran K, Verma R, Liu Y (2012) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: a comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy 42:450–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.010 Jena PR (2018) Does trade liberalization create more pollution? Evidence from a panel regression analysis across the states of India. Environ Econ Policy Stud 20(4):861–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-018-0217-x Karasoy A (2019) Drivers of carbon emissions in Turkey: considering asymmetric impacts. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(9):9219–9231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04354-4 Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45(1):1–28 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581Accessed 3 Dec 2019 Lau LS, Choong CK, Eng YK (2014) Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy 68:490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.002 Lin FL, Inglesi-Lotz R, Chang T (2018) Revisit coal consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth nexus in China and India using a newly developed bootstrap ARDL bound test. Energy Explor Exploit 36(3):450–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144598717741031 Managi S, Hibiki A, Tsurumi T (2009) Does trade openness improve environmental quality? J Environ Econ Manag 58(3):346–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.04.008 Martı́nez-Zarzoso I, Bengochea-Morancho A (2004) Pooled mean group estimation of an environmental Kuznets curve for CO2. Econ Lett 82(1):121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.07.008 McNown R, Sam CY, Goh SK (2018) Bootstrapping the autoregressive distributed lag test for cointegration. Appl Econ 50(13):1509–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1366643 Moomaw WR, Unruh GC (1997) Are environmental Kuznets curves misleading us? The case of CO2 emissions. Environ Dev Econ 2(4):451–463. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X97000247 Müller-Fürstenberger G, Wagner M (2007) Exploring the environmental Kuznets hypothesis: theoretical and econometric problems. Ecol Econ 62(3-4):648–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.005 Nazir MI, Nazir MR, Hashmi SH, Ali Z (2018) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Pakistan: empirical evidence form ARDL bound testing and causality approach. Int J Green Energy 15(14-15):947–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2018.1529590 Nazlioglu S, Gormus NA, Soytas U (2016) Oil prices and real estate investment trusts (REITs): gradual-shift causality and volatility transmission analysis. Energy Econ 60:168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.009 Nazlioglu S, Gormus A, Soytas U (2019) Oil prices and monetary policy in emerging markets: structural shifts in causal linkages. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 55(1):105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1434072 Ozcan B, Apergis N, Shahbaz M (2018) A revisit of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey: new evidence from bootstrap rolling window causality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(32):32381–32394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3165-x Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U, Saboori B (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1916–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5447-x Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (No.292778). International Labour Organization Panayotou T (1997) Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environ Dev Econ 2(4):465–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X97000259 Pata UK (2018a) Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Clean Prod 187:770–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236 Pata UK (2018b) The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey. Energy 160:1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.095 Pata UK (2018c) The effect of urbanization and industrialization on carbon emissions in Turkey: evidence from ARDL bounds testing procedure. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(8):7740–7747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1088-6 Perman R, Stern DI (2003) Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 47(3):325–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00216 Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616 Rauf A, Liu X, Amin W, Ozturk I, Rehman OU, Hafeez M (2018) Testing EKC hypothesis with energy and sustainable development challenges: a fresh evidence from Belt and Road Initiative economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(32):32066–32080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3052-5 Raza SA, Shah N (2018) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in G7 countries: The role of renewable energy consumption and trade. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(27):26965–26977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2673-z Schwert GW (1989) Tests for unit roots: a Monte Carlo investigation. J Bus Econ Stat 7(2):147–159. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410354 Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27(2):147–162. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1031 Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S (1992) Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-country evidence. (Vol. 904). World Bank Publications Shahbaz M, Lean HH, Shabbir MS (2012) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(5):2947–2953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.015 Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K, Hammoudeh S (2017) Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Econ 61:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008 Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.020 Shahbaz M, Haouas I, Van Hoang TH (2019) Economic growth and environmental degradation in Vietnam: is the environmental Kuznets curve a complete picture? Emerg Mark Rev 38:197–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2018.12.006 Sims CA (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 48(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017 Stern DI (2002) Explaining changes in global sulfur emissions: an econometric decomposition approach. Ecol Econ 42(1-2):201–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00050-2 Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econ 66(1-2):225–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8 Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191 World Bank (2018) World development indicators Accessed on 22th November, 2018 through the link https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators Zhang S (2018) Is trade openness good for environment in South Korea? The role of non-fossil electricity consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:9510–9522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1264-3 Zhang Y, Zhang S (2018) The impacts of GDP, trade structure, exchange rate and FDI inflows on China’s carbon emissions. Energy Policy 120:347–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.056 Zhang S, Liu X, Bae J (2017) Does trade openness affect CO2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industrialized countries? Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(21):17616–17625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9392-8 Zivot E, Andrews DWK (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10(3):251–270. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410372