Environmental Innovations and Firm Profitability: Unmasking the Porter Hypothesis
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aiken DV, Färe R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka CA (2009) Pollution abatement and productivity growth: evidence from Germany Japan, the Netherlands, and the United States. Environ Resour Econ 44(1):11–28
Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2011) The porter hypothesis at 20. Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, January 2011
André FJ, González P, Porteiro N (2009) Strategic quality competition and the porter hypothesis. J Environ Econ Manag 57(2):182–194
Arora A, Cason TN (1995) An experiment in voluntary environmental regulation: participation in EPA’s 33/50 program. J Environ Econ Manag 28(3):271–286
Arora A, Cangopadhyay S (1995) Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance. J Econ Behav Organ 28(3):289–309
Becker R, Henderson V (2000) Effects of air quality regulations on polluting industries. J Polit Econ 108(2):379–421
Berman E, Bui LTM (2001) Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries. Rev Econ Stat 83(3):498–510
Bloom N, Genakos C, Martin R, Sadun R (2010) Modern management: good for the environment or just hot air? Econ J 120(544):551–572
Boyd GA, McClelland JD (1999) The impact of environmental constraints on productivity improvement in integrated paper plants. J Environ Econ Manag 38(2):121–142
Brännlund R, Lundgren T (2009) Environmental policy without costs? A review of the porter hypothesis. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 3:75–117
Brunnermeier SB, Levinson A (2004) Examining the evidence on environmental regulations and industry locations. J Environ Dev 13(6):6–41
Buchanan JM, Tullock G (1975) Polluters’ profits and political response: direct controls versus taxes. Am Econ Rev 65(1):139–147
Canõn-de-Francia J, Garcés-Ayerbe C, Ramírez-Alesón M (2007) Are more innovative firms less vulnerable to new environmental regulation? Environ Resour Econ 36(3):295–311
Carrión-Flores CE, Innes R (2010) Environmental innovation and environmental performance. J Environ Econ Manag 59(1):27–42
Christainsen GB, Haveman RH (1981) The contribution of environmental regulation to the slowdown in productivity growth. J Environ Econ Manag 8(4):381–390
Czarnitzki D, Licht G (2006) Additionality of public R &D grants in a transition economy: the case of eastern Germany. Econ Trans 14(1):101–131
Foster L, Haltiwanger J, Syverson C (2008) Reallocation, firm turnover, and efficiency: selection on productivity or profitability. Am Econ Rev 98(1):394–425
Geroski P, Machin S, Van Reenen J (1993) The profitability of innovating firms. RAND J Econ 24(2):198–211
Gollop FM, Roberts MJ (1983) Environmental regulation and productivity growth: the case of fossil-fueled electric power generation. J Polit Econ 91(4):654–674
Gray WB (1987) The cost of regulation: OSHA, EPA and the productivity slowdown. Am Econ Rev 77(5):998–1006
Gray WB, Shadbegian RJ (1998) Environmental regulation, investment timing, and technology choice. J Indust Econ 46(2):235–256
Gray WB, Shadbegian RJ (2003) Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. J Environ Econ Manag 46(3):384–402
Greenstone M (2002) The impacts of environmental regulations on industrial activity: evidence from the 1970 and 1977 clean air act amendments and the census manufacturers. J Polit Econ 110(6):1175–1218
Griliches Z, Mairesse J (1984) Productivity and R &D at the firm level. In: Griliches Z (ed) R &D, patents, and productivity. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 339-374
Grimpe C, Kaiser U (2010) Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: the gains and pains from R &D outsourcing. J Manag Stud 47(8):1483–1509
Haller SA, Murphy L (2012) Corporate expenditure on environmental protection. Environ Resour Econ 51(2):277–296
Heger D, Kraft K (2008) A Test of the quality of concentration indices. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 08–072, Mannheim
Henderson JV (1996) Effects of air quality regulation. Am Econ Rev 86(4):789–813
Jaffe AB, Stavins RN (1995) Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: the effect of alternative policy instruments on technology diffusion. J Environ Econ Manag 29(3):43–63
Jaffe AB, Palmer K (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):610–619
Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2002) Environmental policy and technological change. Environ Resour Econ 22(1–2):41–69
Janz N, Ebling G, Gottschalk S, Niggemann H (2001) The Mannheim innovation panels (MIP and MIP-S) of the centre for European economic research (ZEW). Schmollers Jahrbuch 121(1):123–129
Konar S, Cohen MA (2001) Does the market value environmental performance? Rev Econ Stat 83(2):281–289
Lanoie P, Laurent-Lucchetti J, Johnstone N, Ambec S (2011) Environmental policy, innovation and performance: new insights on the porter hypothesis. J Econ Manag Strat 20(3):803–842
Lerner AP (1934) The concept of monopoly and the measurement of monopoly power. Rev Econ Stud 1(3):157–175
List JA, Millimet DL, Fredriksson PG, McHone WW (2003) Effects of environmental regulations on manufacturing plant births: evidence from a propensity score matching estimator. Rev Econ Stat 85(4):944–952
Martin R, Muûls M, de Preux LB, Wagner UJ (2012) Anatomy of a paradox: management practices, organizational structure and energy efficiency. J Environ Econ Manag 63(2):208–223
Mohr RD (2002) Technical change, external economies, and the porter hypothesis. J Environ Econ Manag 43(1):158–168
Newell RG, Jaffe AB, Stavins RN (1999) The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Q J Econ 114(3):941–975
Palmer K, Oates WE, Portney PR (1995) Tightening environmental standards: the benefits-cost or no-cost paradigm? J Econ Perspect 9(4):119–132
Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and theory. Res Policy 26(6):343–373
Peters B (2008) Innovation and firm performance: an empirical investigation for German firms. Physica, New York
Piot-Lepetit I, Le Moing M (2007) Productivity and environmental regulation: the effect of the nitrates directive in the French pic sector. Environ Resour Econ 38(4):433–446
Popp D, Newell R (2012) Where does energy R &D come from? Examining crowding out from energy R &D. Energy Econ 34(4):980–991
Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118
Rassier DG, Earnhart D (2010) Does the porter hypothesis explain expected future financial performance? The effect of clean water regulation on chemical manufacturing firms. Environ Resour Econ 45(3):353–377
Ravenscraft DJ (1983) Structure-profit relationships at the line of business and industry level. Rev Econ Stat 65(1):22–31
Salop SC, Scheffman DT (1983) Raising rivals’ costs. Am Econ Rev 73(2):267–271
Shadbegian RJ, Gray WB (2005) Pollution abatement expenditures and plant-level productivity. Ecol Econ 54(2–3):196–208
Schmalensee R (1989) Inter-industry studies of structure and performance. In: Schmalensee R, Willig RD (eds) Handbook of industrial organization, vol II, chap 16:951–1009
Schmutzler A (2001) Environmental regulations and managerial myopia. Environ Resour Econ 18(1):87–100
van Leeuwen G, Mohnen P (2013) Revising the porter hypothesis: an empirical analysis of green innovation for the Netherlands. UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series, 2013–002
Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge