Enterprise architecture modelling—the issue of integration

Advanced Engineering Informatics - Tập 18 Số 4 - Trang 205-216 - 2004
Marc Lankhorst1
1René van Buuren, Diederik van Leeuwen, Henk Jonkers, Hugo ter Doest, Telematica Instituut, P.O. Box 589, 7500 AN Enschede, The Netherlands#TAB#

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bernus, 2003

Booch, 1999

Creasy PN, Ellis, G.A Conceptual graph approach to conceptual schema integration. In: Proceedings of the ICCS'93, conceptual graphs for knowledge representation: first international conference on conceptual structures, Quebec, Canada; 1993.

Eertink H, Janssen W, Oude Luttighuis P, Teeuw W, Vissers C.A Business process design language. In: Proceedings of the first world congress on formal methods, Toulouse, France; September 1999.

Eriksson, 2000

Frankel, 2003

Gamma, 1995, Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software

Garlan D, Monroe RT, Wile D. ACME: an architecture description interchange language. In: Proceedings of the CASCON '97, Toronto, Canada; November 1997. p. 169–83

Handler, 2003

Henderson, 1993, Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations, IBM Syst J, 32, 10.1147/sj.382.0472

Iacob M, et al. State of the art in architecture support, ArchiMate deliverable D3.1. Enschede, The Netherlands: Telematica Instituut; 2003. http://doc.telin.nl/dscgi/ds.py/Get/File-27882/

1993, Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0) draft

2000

2002, Information technology—open distributed processing—reference model–enterprise language

Jonkers H, Lankhorst MM, Buuren R van, Hoppenbrouwers S, Bonsangue M, Torre L van der (2004), Concepts for modelling enterprise architectures, Int J of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS), special issue on Architecture in IT (forthcoming).

Leeuwen D van, Doest H ter, Lankhorst MM. An integrated workbench for enterprise architecture. 6th international conference on enterprise information systems (ICEIS 2004), Porto, Portugal; 2004.

Medvidovic, 2000, A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages, IEEE Trans Software Eng, 26, 70, 10.1109/32.825767

Nadler, 1992

Object Management Group. Meta object facility (MOF) specification, Version 1.4, April 2002. Full specification formal/2002-04-03, Object Management Group; 2002. http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/02-04-03.pdf

Object Management Group. UML profile for enterprise distributed object computting (EDOC). Final Adopted Specification ptc/02-02-05, Object Management Group; 2002. http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/02-02-05.pdf

Object Management Group. XML metadata interchange (XMI), Version 2.0. Specification formal/03-05-02, Object Management Group; May 2003. http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/03-05-02.pdf

Object Management Group. Unified modeling language: superstructure. Version 2.0. Final adopted specification ptc/03-08-02, Object Management Group; 2003. http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/03-08-02.pdf

Object Management Group. Unified modeling language: infrastructure. Version 2.0. Final adopted specification ptc/03-09-15; 2003. http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/03-09-15.pdf.

Scheer, 1994

Schefstroem, 1993

Tyndale-Biscoe S. RM-ODP enterprise language ISO/ITU-T 15414/X911; 2002. http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-t/com17/tutorial/81999_pp7.ppt

White SA. Business process modeling notation. Working Draft (1.0) August 25, Business Process Management Initiative. (BPMI); 2003.

Business Project Team, ebXML Business Process Specification Schema version 1.01, UNICEFACT and OASIS, May 11, 2001.

Davenport T, Short JE. The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process re-design, sloan management review, Summer, 1990, pp. 309–330.

Steen MWA, Lankharst MM, Doest Hter, Strating P, lacob ME. Service oriented Enterprise architecture, Chapter 7. In: Stojanovic Z., Dahanayake A(eds), Service oriented Software System engineering: Challenges and Practices, IDEA Group, 2005.