Enrichment use in finishing pigs and its relationship with damaging behaviours: Comparing three wood species and a rubber floor toy

Applied Animal Behaviour Science - Tập 224 - Trang 104944 - 2020
Jen-Yun Chou1,2,3, Rick B. D’Eath2, Dale A. Sandercock2, Keelin O’Driscoll1
1Teagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
2Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), Animal & Veterinary Sciences Research Group, Roslin Institute Building, Easter Bush, EH25 9RG, Midlothian, UK
3University of Edinburgh, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Easter Bush EH25 9RG, Midlothian, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Apple, 1992, The influence of pen size on toy preference of growing pigs, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 35, 149, 10.1016/0168-1591(92)90005-V Barbari, 2017, Supply of wood as environmental enrichment material to post-weaning piglets, Agron. Res., 15, 313 Boissy, 2014, How studying interactions between animal emotions, cognition, and personality can contribute to improve Farm animal welfare, 81 Bracke, 2006, Expert opinion regarding environmental enrichment materials for pigs, Anim. Welf., 15, 67, 10.1017/S0962728600029973 Bradshaw, 1996, Behavioural and hormonal responses of pigs during transport: effect of mixing and duration of journey, Anim. Sci., 62, 547, 10.1017/S1357729800015095 Casal, 2016, Effect of environmental enrichment and herbal compound supplementation on physiological stress indicators (chromogranin A, cortisol and tumour necrosis factor-a) in growing pigs, Animal, 11, 1228, 10.1017/S1751731116002561 Chou, 2018, Use of different wood types as environmental enrichment to manage tail biting in docked pigs in a commercial fully-slatted system, Livest. Sci., 213, 19, 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.04.004 Chou, 2019, Can dietary fibre level and a single enrichment type reduce the risk of tail biting in undocked pigs? Chou, 2019, Rearing undocked pigs on fully slatted floors using multiple types and variations of enrichment, Animals, 9, 139, 10.3390/ani9040139 Coutellier, 2007, Pig’s responses to repeated social regrouping and relocation during the growing-finishing period, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 105, 102, 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.007 D’Eath, 2009, The natural behaviour of the pig, 10.1007/978-1-4020-8909-1_2 de Groot, 2000, Immunity in barren and enriched housed pigs differing in baseline cortisol concentration, Physiol. Behav., 71, 217, 10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00336-X de Jong, 1998, Effects of strawbedding on physiological responses to stressors and behavior in growing pigs, Physiol. Behav., 64, 303, 10.1016/S0031-9384(98)00066-3 de Jong, 2000, Effects of environmental enrichment on behavioral responses to novelty, learning, and memory, and the circadian rhythm in cortisol in growing pigs, Physiol. Behav., 68, 571, 10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00212-7 DeBoer, 2015, An initial investigation into the effects of isolation and enrichment on the welfare of laboratory pigs housed in the PigTurn<SUP>®</SUP> system, assessed using tear staining, behaviour, physiology and haematology, Anim. Welf., 24, 15, 10.7120/09627286.24.1.015 Duncan, 1998, Behavior and behavioral needs, Poult. Sci., 77, 1766, 10.1093/ps/77.12.1766 Escribano, 2015, Changes in saliva biomarkers of stress and immunity in domestic pigs exposed to a psychosocial stressor, Res. Vet. Sci., 102, 38, 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.013 European Commission, 2009, Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs (codified version), Off. J. Europ Union. European Commission, 2016, Commission Recommendation (EU) 2016/336 of 8 March 2016 on the application of Council Directive 2008/120/EC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs as regards measures to reduce the need for tail-docking, Off. J. Europ Union. European Commission, 2016 Finkemeier, 2018, Personality research in mammalian farm animals: concepts, measures, and relationship to welfare, Front. Vet. Sci., 5, 10.3389/fvets.2018.00131 Giuliotti, 2019, Effect of different environment enrichments on behaviour and social interactions in growing pigs, Animals, 9, 101, 10.3390/ani9030101 Haigh, 2016, The long and short of it: Irish farmers’ experiences of tail biting Harley, 2012, Evaluating the prevalence of tail biting and carcase condemnations in slaughter pigs in the Republic and Northern Ireland, and the potential of abattoir meat inspection as a welfare surveillance tool, Vet. Rec., 171, 10.1136/vr.100986 Held, 2009, Advances in the study of cognition, behavioural priorities and emotions, 10.1007/978-1-4020-8909-1_3 Horback, 2016, Behavioral preference for different enrichment objects in a commercial sow herd, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 184, 7, 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.09.002 Hunter, 1999, Tail biting in pigs 1: the prevalence at six UK abattoirs and the relationship of tail biting with docking, sex and other carcass damage, The Pig Journal, 43, 18 Jensen, 2015, Effect of increasing amounts of straw on pigs’ explorative behaviour, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 171, 58, 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.035 Larsen, 2019, Increasing the number of wooden beams from two to four increases the exploratory behaviour of finisher pigs, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. Merlot, 2012, Health and immune traits of Basque and Large White pigs housed in a conventional or enriched environment, Animal, 6, 1290, 10.1017/S1751731112000080 Morrison, 2007, The behaviour, welfare, growth performance and meat quality of pigs housed in a deep-litter, large group housing system compared to a conventional confinement system, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 103, 12, 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.002 Nannoni, 2018, Enrichment devices for undocked heavy pigs: effects on animal welfare, blood parameters and production traits, Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 18, 45, 10.1080/1828051X.2018.1472531 Nzolo, 2014 Scollo, 2014, Does stocking density modify affective state in pigs as assessed by cognitive bias, behavioural and physiological parameters?, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 153, 26, 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.01.006 Scott, 2009, Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of finishing pigs in two different housing systems 3. Hanging toy versus rootable toy of the same material, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 116, 186, 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.07.002 Smulders, 2006, Validation of a behavioral observation tool to assess pig welfare, Physiol. Behav., 89, 438, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.07.002 Studnitz, 2007, Why do pigs root and in what will they root?, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 107, 183, 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.11.013 Telkänranta, 2014, Fresh wood reduces tail and ear biting and increases exploratory behaviour in finishing pigs, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 161, 51, 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.09.007 van de Weerd, 2019, Providing Effective Environmental Enrichment to Pigs: How Far Have We Come?, Animals, 9, 254, 10.3390/ani9050254 van de Weerd, 2003, A systematic approach towards developing environmental enrichment for pigs, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 84, 101, 10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00150-3 van de Weerd, 2006, Effects of species-relevant environmental enrichment on the behaviour and productivity of finishing pigs, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 99, 230, 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.10.014