Enriching social media data allows a more robust representation of cultural ecosystem services

Ecosystem Services - Tập 50 - Trang 101328 - 2021
Nathan Fox1,2, Laura J. Graham3,4, Felix Eigenbrod1, James M. Bullock1,2, Katherine E. Parks1
1School of Geography and the Environment, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
2UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK
3School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
4Ecosystem Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aiba, 2019, The seasonal and scale-dependent associations between vegetation quality and hiking activities as a recreation service, Sustain. Sci., 14, 119, 10.1007/s11625-018-0609-7 Becken, 2017, Monitoring the environment and human sentiment on the Great Barrier Reef: Assessing the potential of collective sensing, J. Environ. Manage., 203, 87, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.007 Bian, 1999, Comparing effects of aggregation methods on statistical and spatial properties of simulated spatial data, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 65, 73 Balzan, 2018, Assessing urban recreation ecosystem services through the use of geocache visitation and preference data: A case-study from an urbanised island environment, One Ecosystem, 3, e24490, 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24490 Bennett, 2015, Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 14, 76, 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007 Brindley, 2019, Is more always better? Exploring field survey and social media indicators of quality of urban greenspace, in relation to health, Urban For. Urban Greening, 39, 45, 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.015 Byczek, 2018, Benefits of crowd-sourced GPS information for modelling the recreation ecosystem service, PLoS One, 13, e0202645, 10.1371/journal.pone.0202645 Casalegno, 2013, Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services, PLoS One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0068437 Chan, 2011, 206 Chen, 2020, Comparing cultural ecosystem service delivery in dykelands and marshes using Instagram: A case of the Cornwallis (Jijuktu'kwejk) River, Nova Scotia, Canada, Ocean Coast. Manage., 193, 105254, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105254 Chhetri, 2015, A GIS methodology for modelling hiking experiences in the Grampians National Park, Australia, Tourism Geogr., 17, 795, 10.1080/14616688.2015.1083609 Christian, 2016, Single document automatic text summarization using term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), ComTech Comput. Math. Eng. Appl., 7, 285 Clemente, 2019, Combining social media photographs and species distribution models to map cultural ecosystem services: The case of a Natural Park in Portugal, Ecol. Ind., 96, 59, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.043 Collins-Kreiner, 2017, Why Do People Hike? Hiking the Israel National Trail, Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 108, 669, 10.1111/tesg.12245 Daniel, 2012, Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, 8812, 10.1073/pnas.1114773109 Dickinson, 2017, Cultural ecosystem services: Characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research, Ecosystem Services, 25, 179, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.014 Do, 2019, Valuating aesthetic benefits of cultural ecosystem services using conservation culturomics, Ecosyst. Serv., 36, 100894, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100894 Evangelopoulos, 2013, Latent semantic analysis, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cognit. Sci., 4, 683, 10.1002/wcs.1254 Figueroa-Alfaro, 2017, Evaluating the aesthetic value of cultural ecosystem services by mapping geo-tagged photographs from social media data on Panoramio and Flickr, J. Environ. Plann. Manage., 60, 266, 10.1080/09640568.2016.1151772 Fischer, 2016, Coproduction of ecosystem services as human-nature interactions—An analytical framework, Land Use Policy, 52, 41, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.004 Fish, 2016, Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement, Ecosyst. Serv., 21, 208, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002 Fox, 2020, Incorporating geodiversity in ecosystem service decisions, Ecosystems People, 16, 151, 10.1080/26395916.2020.1758214 Fox, 2020, photosearcher: Photo Searcher, R package version, 1 Gefen, 2017, A guide to text analysis with latent semantic analysis in R with annotated code: Studying online reviews and the stack exchange community, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 41, 21 Ghermandi, 2020, Social media-based analysis of cultural ecosystem services and heritage tourism in a coastal region of Mexico, Tourism Manage., 77, 104002, 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104002 Ghermandi, 2019, Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: A systematic map, Global Environ. Change, 55, 36, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.003 Google Cloud Vision, 2020. Documentation for the Google Cloud Vision API [WWW Document]. URL www.cloud.google.com/vision/. Gordon, 2013, The role of geodiversity in delivering ecosystem services and benefits in Scotland, Scott. J. Geol., 49, 41, 10.1144/sjg2011-465 Gosal, 2019, Using social media, machine learning and natural language processing to map multiple recreational beneficiaries, Ecosyst. Serv., 38, 100958, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100958 Graham, 2019, Scale dependency in drivers of outdoor recreation in England, People and Nature, 1, 406, 10.1002/pan3.10042 Gray, 2008, Geodiversity: developing the paradigm, Proc. Geol. Assoc., 119, 287, 10.1016/S0016-7878(08)80307-0 Gray, M. 2004. Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. John Wiley & Sons. Gray, 2012, Valuing geodiversity in an ‘ecosystem services’ context, Scottish Geogr. J., 128, 177, 10.1080/14702541.2012.725858 Havinga, 2020, Defining and spatially modelling cultural ecosystem services using crowdsourced data, Ecosyst. Serv., 43, 101091, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101091 Hirons, 2016, Valuing cultural ecosystem services, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 41, 545, 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085831 Hjort, 2015, Why geodiversity matters in valuing nature's stage, Conserv. Biol., 29, 630, 10.1111/cobi.12510 Haines-Young, 2018, Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES) V5.1 and guidance on the application of the revised structure Hausmann, 2019, Assessing global popularity and threats to Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas using social media data, Sci. Total Environ., 683, 617, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.268 Huang, 2019, Image–text sentiment analysis via deep multimodal attentive fusion, Knowl. Based Syst., 167, 26, 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.01.019 Kiernan, 2015, Landforms as sacred places: implications for geodiversity and geoheritage, Geoheritage, 7, 177, 10.1007/s12371-014-0128-6 Kim, 2019, Quantifying nature-based tourism in protected areas in developing countries by using social big data, Tourism Management, 72, 249, 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.005 King, 2017, Biodiversity and cultural ecosystem benefits in lowland landscapes in southern England, J. Environ. Psychol., 53, 185, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.08.002 Kondo, 2018, Urban green space and its impact on human health, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15, 445, 10.3390/ijerph15030445 Koto, F., Adriani, M. 2015, June. A comparative study on twitter sentiment analysis: Which features are good?. InInternational Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems(pp. 453-457). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19581-0_46. Langemeyer, 2018, Mapping the intangible: Using geolocated social media data to examine landscape aesthetics, Land Use Policy, 77, 542, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.049 Lee, 2019, Mapping cultural ecosystem services 2.0–Potential and shortcomings from unlabeled crowd sourced images, Ecol. Ind., 96, 505, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.035 Mayer, 2018, Assessing and valuing the recreational ecosystem services of Germany’s national parks using travel cost models, Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 371, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.009 Mancini, 2019, Quantifying wildlife watchers’ preferences to investigate the overlap between recreational and conservation value of natural areas, J. Appl. Ecol., 56, 387, 10.1111/1365-2664.13274 Milcu, 2013, Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research, Ecol. Soc., 18, 10.5751/ES-05790-180344 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: New Island Press, 13, p. 520. Minkiewicz, 2016, Co-production of service experiences: insights from the cultural sector, J. Serv. Mark., 30, 749, 10.1108/JSM-04-2015-0156 Mitten, 2018, Hiking: A low-cost, accessible intervention to promote health benefits, Am. J. Lifestyle Med., 12, 302, 10.1177/1559827616658229 Monkman, 2018, Text and data mining of social media to map wildlife recreation activity, Biol. Conserv., 228, 89, 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.010 Moreno-Llorca, R., Méndez, P.F., Ros-Candeira, A., Alcaraz-Segura, D., Santamaría, L., Ramos-Ridao, Á.F., Revilla, E., García, F.J.B. and Vaz, A.S. 2020. Evaluating tourist profiles and nature-based experiences in Biosphere Reserves using Flickr: Matches and mismatches between online social surveys and photo content analysis. Sci. Total Environ. p. 140067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140067. Mullen, 2018, USAboundaries: Historical and contemporary boundaries of the United States of America, J. Open Source Softw., 3, 314, 10.21105/joss.00314 Nielsen, F.Å. 2011. A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1103.2903. Oteros-Rozas, 2018, Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites, Ecol. Ind., 94, 74, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.009 Pagnuco, 2016, Analysis of genetic association in Listeria and Diabetes using Hierarchical Clustering and Silhouette Index, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 705, p. 012002), 10.1088/1742-6596/705/1/012002 Palomo, 2016, Disentangling the pathways and effects of ecosystem service co-production, Adv. Ecol. Res., 54, 245, 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.003 Pastorella, 2017, People’s preferences for Alpine forest landscapes: results of an internet-based survey, J. For. Res., 22, 36, 10.1080/13416979.2017.1279708 Pastur, 2016, Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia, Landscape Ecol., 31, 383, 10.1007/s10980-015-0254-9 Plieninger, 2013, Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level, Land Use Policy, 33, 118, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013 R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. Plumwood, 2006, The concept of a cultural landscape: Nature, culture and agency in the land., Ethics and the Environment, 115, 10.2979/ETE.2006.11.2.115 Raymond, 2018, An embodied perspective on the co-production of cultural ecosystem services: toward embodied ecosystems, J. Environ. Plann. Manage., 61, 778, 10.1080/09640568.2017.1312300 Reynaud, 2017, A Global Meta-Analysis of the Value of Ecosystem Services Provided by Lakes, Ecol Econ, 137, 184, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.001 Richards, 2018, Using image recognition to automate assessment of cultural ecosystem services from social media photographs, Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 318, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.004 Sankey, T. 2017. Statistical Descriptions of Spatial Patterns. In: Shekhar S., Xiong H., Zhou X. (eds) Encyclopedia of GIS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17885-1_1351. Schirpke, 2018, Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings, Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 336, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.017 Schwemmer, C. 2019. imgrec: An Interface for Image Recognition. R package version 0.1.1. https://github.com/cschwem2er/imgrec. Sharp, R., Douglass, J., Wolny, S., Arkema, K., Bernhardt, J., Bierbower, W., Chaumont, N., Denu, D., Fisher, D., Glowinski, K., Griffin, R., Guannel, G., Guerry, A., Johnson, J., Hamel, P., Kennedy, C., Kim, C.K., Lacayo, M., Lonsdorf, E., Mandle, L., Rogers, L., Silver, J., Toft, J., Verutes, G., Vogl, A. L., Wood, S, and Wyatt, K. 2020. InVEST 3.8.7.post9+ug.ga50c7f5 User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund. https://storage.googleapis.com/releases.naturalcapitalproject.org/invest-userguide/latest/index.html. Sinclair, 2020, Valuing nature-based recreation using a crowdsourced travel cost method: A comparison to onsite survey data and value transfer, Ecosyst. Serv., 45, 101165, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101165 Sinclair, 2020, Using social media to estimate visitor provenance and patterns of recreation in Germany's national parks, J. Environ. Manage., 263, 110418, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110418 Small, 2017, The challenge of valuing ecosystem services that have no material benefits., Global Environmental Change, 44, 57, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.005 Spangenberg, 2014, The ecosystem service cascade: Further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy, Ecol. Econ., 104, 22, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.025 Stephens, 2015, Management by proxy? The use of indices in applied ecology, J. Appl. Ecol., 52, 1, 10.1111/1365-2664.12383 Tenerelli, 2016, Crowdsourcing indicators for cultural ecosystem services: A geographically weighted approach for mountain landscapes, Ecol. Ind., 64, 237, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.12.042 Tenkanen, 2017, Instagram, Flickr, or Twitter: Assessing the usability of social media data for visitor monitoring in protected areas, Sci. Rep., 7, 1, 10.1038/s41598-017-18007-4 Van Berkel, 2018, Quantifying the visual-sensory landscape qualities that contribute to cultural ecosystem services using social media and LiDAR, Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 326, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.022 Wang, X., Xu, Y. 2019. July. An improved index for clustering validation based on silhouette index and Calinski-Harabasz index. InIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering(Vol. 569, No. 5, p. 052024). IOP Publishing. Van Berkel, 2014, Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape, Ecol Indic, 27, 163, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025 Van Zanten, 2016, Continental-scale quantification of landscape values using social media data, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 12874, 10.1073/pnas.1614158113 Wilcer, 2019, Exploring the diverse motivations of day hikers: Implications for hike marketing and management, J. Park Recreation Admin., 37 Wild, F. 2015. lsa: Latent Semantic Analysis. R package version 0.73.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lsa. Willcock, 2019, A continental-scale validation of ecosystem service models, Ecosystems, 22, 1902, 10.1007/s10021-019-00380-y Wilson, 2019, A path toward the use of trail users’ tweets to assess effectiveness of the environmental stewardship scheme: an exploratory analysis of the Pennine Way National Trail, Appl. Spatial Anal. Policy, 12, 71, 10.1007/s12061-016-9201-7 Wood, 2013, Using social media to quantify nature-based tourism and recreation, Sci. Rep., 3, 1, 10.1038/srep02976 Yan, 2019, An exploratory analysis of usability of Flickr tags for land use/land cover attribution, Geo-spatial Inf. Sci., 22, 12, 10.1080/10095020.2018.1560044