Enhancing the Economic Value of Large Investments in Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) through Inclusion of Ecosystems Services Benefits

MDPI AG - Tập 9 Số 11 - Trang 841
Santiago Vincent1,2, Mohanasundar Radhakrishnan2, László G. Hayde2, Assela Pathirana2
1CSI Ingenieros, Soriano 1180, 11100 Montevideo, Uruguay
2Water Science and Engineering Department, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, 2611 AX Delft, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Although Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) are used in cities across the world as effective flood adaptation responses, their economic viability has frequently been questioned. Inclusion of the monetary value of ecosystem services (ES) provided by SuDS can increase the rate of return on investments made. Hence, this paper aims at reviewing the enhancement of the economic value of large-scale investments in SuDS through inclusion of ecosystem services. This study focuses on the flood reduction capacity and the ES benefits of green roofs and rain barrels in the combined sewerage network of Montevideo Municipality in Uruguay. The methodology comprises a cost–benefit analysis—with and without monetised ES provided by SuDS—of two drainage network configurations comprising: (i) SuDS; and (ii) SuDS and detention storage. The optimal drainage design for both these drainage configurations have been determined using SWMM-EA, a tool which uses multi-objective optimisation based evolutionary algorithm (EA) and the storm water management model (SWMM). In both design configurations, total benefits comprising both flood reduction and ES benefits are always higher than their costs. The use of storage along with SuDS provides greater benefits with a larger reduction in flooding, and thus is more cost-effective than using SuDS alone. The results show that, for both of the drainage configurations, the larger investments are not beneficial unless ES benefits are taken into account. Hence, it can be concluded that the inclusion of ES benefits is necessary to justify large-scale investments in SuDS.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2016). Financial Management of Flood Risks. OECD Report Series, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD).

Radhakrishnan, M., Pathirana, A., Ashley, R., and Zevenbergen, C. (2017). Structuring climate adaptation through multiple perspectives: Framework and case study on flood risk management. Water, 9.

United Nations (2005). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, United Nations.

Fletcher, 2015, Suds, Lid, Bmps, Wsud and More-The Evolution and Application of Terminology Surrounding Urban Drainage, Urban Water J., 12, 525, 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314

P.S.S.N.W. Agency (2014). Active, Beautiful, Clean Waters Design Guidelines.

Charlesworth, S.M., and Mezue, M. (2016). Sustainable Drainage Out of the Temperate Zone: The Humid Tropics. Sustainable Surface Water Management: A Handbook for SUDS, Wiley-Blackwell.

Hoang, 2016, System interactions of stormwater management using sustainable urban drainage systems and green infrastructure, Urban Water J., 13, 739, 10.1080/1573062X.2015.1036083

Horton, B., Digman, C.J., Ashley, R.M., and Gill, E. (2016). BeST (Benefits of SuDS Tool) W045c BeST-Technical Guidance, CIRIA. Release Version 3.

Ashley, 2015, UK sustainable drainage systems: Past, present and future, Civ. Eng., 168, 125

Ashton, R., Baker, R., Dean, J., Golshetti, G., Jaluzot, A., Jones, N., Moss, M., Steele, M., Williams, W., and Wilmers, P. (2011). Building Natural Value for Sustainable Economic Development: The Green Infrastructure Valuation Toolkit User Guide, Green Infrastructure Valuation Network.

Costanza, 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253, 10.1038/387253a0

European Environment Agency (2016). Urban Adaptation to Climate Change in Europe: Transforming Cities in a Changing Climate, European Environment Agency.

Pathirana, A. (2014). SWMM5-EA-A Tool for Learning Optimization of Urban Drainage and Sewerage Systems with Genetic Algorithms. International Conference on Hydroinformatics, CUNY Academic Works.

Deb, 2002, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput., 6, 182, 10.1109/4235.996017

James, W., Huber, W., Pitt, R., Dickinson, R., Rosener, L., Aldrich, J., and James, W. (2002). SWMM4 User’s Manual (User’s Guide to the EPA Stormwater Management Model and to PCSWMM), University of Guelph and CHAI.

Delelegn, 2011, Multi-objective optimisation of cost-benefit of urban flood management using a 1D2D coupled model, Water Sci. Technol., 63, 1054, 10.2166/wst.2011.290

Radhakrishnan, 2012, Modelling formation of disinfection by-products in water distribution: Optimisation using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA, 61, 176, 10.2166/aqua.2012.179

CSI Ingenieros S.A. (2012). Estudio de Alternativas y Proyecto Ejecutivo de las Obras de Drenaje Pluvial en las Cuencas de los Arroyos seco y Quitacalzones—Memoria Descriptiva y Justificativa, Municipality of Montevideo. (In Spanish).

CSI Ingenieros S.A. (2011). Estudio de Alternativas y Proyecto Ejecutivo de las Obras de Drenaje Pluvial en las Cuencas de los Arroyos seco y Quitacalzones—Evaluación SocioeconóMica de Priorización de Inversiones, Municipality of Montevideo. (In Spanish).

Bianchini, 2012, How “green” are the green roofs? Lifecycle analysis of green roof materials, Build. Environ., 48, 57, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.019

Carter, 2008, Life-cycle cost–benefit analysis of extensive vegetated roof systems, J. Environ. Manag., 87, 350, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.024

Lee, A., Sailor, D., Larson, T., and Ogle, R. (2007). Developing a web-based tool for assessing green roofs. Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, Minneapolis, Green Roofs for Healthy Cities.

Clark, 2008, Green roof valuation: A probabilistic economic analysis of environmental benefits, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 2155, 10.1021/es0706652

Doug, B., Hitesh, D., James, L., and Paul, M. (2005). Report on the Environmental Benefits and Costs of Green Roof Technology for the City of Toronto, Ryerson University.

Kosareo, 2007, Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of green roofs, Build. Environ., 42, 2606, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.019

Rosenzweig, C., Gaffin, S., and Parshall, L. (2006). Green Roofs in the New York Metropolitan Region: Research Report.

Smit, J., Nasr, J., and Ratta, A. (1996). Urban Agriculture: Food, Jobs and Sustainable Cities, Urban Agriculture Network, Inc.

Dirección Nacional de Meteorología (2011, January 12). Rainfall Data. Available online: http://meteorologia.gub.uy/index.php/estadisticasclimaticas.

Googlemaps (2017, May 26). Satellite imagery of Montevideo. Available online: http://bit.ly/2qnmyws.

Getter, 2006, The role of extensive green roofs in sustainable development, HortScience, 41, 1276, 10.21273/HORTSCI.41.5.1276

Verde Facil (2017, May 23). Green Roofs. Available online: www.verdefacil.com.

Rieradevall, 2012, Financial feasibility and environmental analysis of potential rainwater harvesting systems: A case study in Spain, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 69, 130, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.014

Thurston, 2010, Using a reverse auction to promote household level stormwater control, Environ. Sci. Policy, 13, 405, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.03.008

Tang, Y. (2012). Exploring the Response of Urban Storm Sewer System to the Implementation of Green Roofs, in Civil & Environmental Eng, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Oficina de Planeamiento y Presupuesto (2012). Metodología General de Formulación y Evaluación Social de Proyectos de Inversión PúBlica, Oficina de Planeamiento y Presupuesto, Uruguay.

Bianchini, 2012, Probabilistic social cost-benefit analysis for green roofs: A lifecycle approach, Build. Environ., 58, 152, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.07.005

Anand, 2011, Economic and environmental analysis of standard, high efficiency, rainwater flushed, and composting toilets, J. Environ. Manag., 92, 419, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.005

Colling, R. (2010). Building Natural Value for Sustainable Economic Development: Green Infrastructure Valuation Toolkit, Genecon LLP.

Poupeau, F. (2016). Alternative water sources towards increased resilience in the Tucson region: Could we do more?. Water Bankruptcy in the Land of Plenty, CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group Boca Raton.

Presidencia (2017, May 23). Decretos de Setiembre de 2012. Available online: https://www.presidencia.gub.uy/normativa/2010-2015/decretos/decretos-09-2012.

Ashley, R.M., Digman, C.J., Horton, B., Gersonius, B., Smith, B., Shaffer, P., and Baylis, A. (2017, October 17). Evaluating the Longer Term Benefits of Sustainable Drainage. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1680/jwama.16.00118.