Enhancing Interpretability of Data-Driven Fault Detection and Diagnosis Methodology with Maintainability Rules in Smart Building Management

Journal of Sensors - Tập 2022 - Trang 1-48 - 2022
Michael Yit Lin Chew1, Ke Yan1
1Department of the Built Environment, National University of Singapore, 117566, Singapore

Tóm tắt

Data-driven fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) methods, referring to the newer generation of artificial intelligence (AI) empowered classification methods, such as data science analysis, big data, Internet of things (IoT), industry 4.0, etc., become increasingly important for facility management in the smart building design and smart city construction. While data-driven FDD methods nowadays outperform the majority of traditional FDD approaches, such as the physically based models and mathematically based models, in terms of both efficiency and accuracy, the interpretability of those methods does not grow significantly. Instead, according to the literature survey, the interpretability of the data-driven FDD methods becomes the main concern and creates barriers for those methods to be adopted in real-world industrial applications. In this study, we reviewed the existing data-driven FDD approaches for building mechanical & electrical engineering (M&E) services faults and discussed the interpretability of the modern data-driven FDD methods. Two data-driven FDD strategies integrating the expert reasoning of the faults were proposed. Lists of expert rules, knowledge of maintainability, international/local standards were concluded for various M&E services, including heating, ventilation air-conditioning (HVAC), plumbing, fire safety, electrical and elevator systems based on surveys of 110 buildings in Singapore. The surveyed results significantly enhance the interpretability of data-driven FDD methods for M&E services, potentially enhance the FDD performance in terms of accuracy and promote the data-driven FDD approaches to real-world facility management practices.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

A. Dexter, Demonstrating automated fault detection and diagnosis methods in real buildings

H. C. Peitsman, 1996, Application of Black-Box Models to HVAC Systems for Fault Detection

10.1080/19401490903414454

10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.021

10.1109/TII.2013.2243743

10.1016/j.ces.2019.01.060

10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110492

10.1016/j.autcon.2019.04.002

10.1080/10789669.2005.10391123

10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.05.049

A. Chong, Uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation of HVAC systems in building energy models, 3

10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.028

10.1080/23744731.2017.1318008

G. Hackmann, 2014, Cyber-physical codesign of distributed structural health monitoring with wireless sensor networks, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 25, 63, 10.1109/TPDS.2013.30

10.1155/2021/9488892

10.1007/s12053-019-09790-2

10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.04.011

S. Lazarova-Molnar, Fault detection and diagnosis for smart buildings: state of the art, trends and challenges, 1

10.1016/j.jobe.2017.10.013

10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107982

10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.11.012

10.1109/TII.2020.2988944

10.1016/j.aei.2020.101176

10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030653

10.3390/smartcities3020021

10.1016/j.future.2018.02.019

N. Mohamed, Industry 4.0: Opportunities for Enhancing Energy Efficiency in Smart Factories, 1

10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.069

K. Yan, 2017, Fast and accurate classification of time series data using extended ELM: application in fault diagnosis of air handling units, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 49, 1349, 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2691774

10.1016/j.neucom.2016.09.076

10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2017.11.003

S. Bendapudi, A Review of Literature on Dynamic Models of Vapor Compression Equipment. Final report for ASHRAE RP-1043

J. M. House, 2001, An expert rule set for fault detection in air-handling units/discussion, ASHRAE Transactions, 107, 858

W. Y. Lee, 1996, Fault diagnosis of an air-handling unit using artificial neural networks, Transactions-American society of heating refrigerating and air conditioning engineers, 102, 540

S. Li, 2010, Development and validation of a dynamic air handling unit model, part 2, ASHRAE Transactions, 116, 57

10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.018

10.3390/en12030527

10.1016/j.eswa.2017.11.045

10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.011

10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.161

B. Butzin, A Survey on Information Modeling and Ontologies in Building Automation, 8615

A. Kroll, 2000, Grey-box models: concepts and application, New frontiers in computational intelligence and its applications, 57, 42

10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00033-1

10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.10.037

10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.039

10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.11.007

10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107850

10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034

10.3390/su12229755

T. Mulumba, Kalman filter-based fault detection and diagnosis for air handling units

10.1109/MC.2021.3071551

10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108057

S. S. Kumar, 2020, Leveraging Visualization Techniques to Develop Improved Deep Neural Network Architecture for Sewer Defect Identification, Construction Research Congress 2020: Infrastructure Systems and Sustainability, 827, 10.1061/9780784482858.089

10.3390/s21124024

V. Gavan, Rule based Fault Detection & Diagnosis for high performance buildings: application to a positive energy building in France

10.1080/10789669.1997.10391359

F. Arévalo, Fault Detection Assessment Using an Extended FMEA and a Rule-Based Expert System, 740

10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.03.024

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Sensors

Tập 2022

1-48

Thông tin tác giả