Enhancing Cane and Sugar Productivity and Profitability Through Relay Intercropping of Autumn Sugarcane with Skipped-Row-Planted Rice in Subtropical Climatic Conditions of India

Sugar Tech - Tập 19 - Trang 11-16 - 2016
S. N. Singh1, R. K. Singh1, Ishwar Singh1, Rajendra Kumar2
1ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India
2U.P Council of Agricultural Research, Lucknow, India

Tóm tắt

The on-farm trials were conducted for two consecutive seasons of 2007–2009 and 2008–2010 using a participatory approach on cultivators’ fields at Bikamau village in Lucknow District of India’s central Uttar Pradesh to explore the feasibility of planting autumn sugarcane at 90-cm row spacing as a relay intercrop in every fifth skipped row of July-transplanted rice at 18-cm row spacing in late September and/or October for enhanced cane and sugar productivity in the Indian subtropics. The cropping system was compared with rice–spring sugarcane and rice–autumn sugarcane. The on-farm trial results revealed that germination (64.4 %) of cane buds, tillers (328,000/ha) and number (155,000/ha), length (225 cm), diameter (2.4 cm) and weight (752 g) of millable cane were markedly better when autumn sugarcane was planted as a relay intercrop in rice in comparison with other cropping systems. Similarly, this cropping system produced the maximum cane (123.4 t/ha) and sugar (14.51 t/ha) along with sugarcane equivalent yields (149.9 t/ha). In turn, relay intercropping system with maximum cane production efficiency of 291 kg/ha/day fetched the highest economic returns (Rs. 262/ha/day) and benefit-to-cost ratio (1.98). Comparing with rice–spring sugarcane cropping system, relay intercropping of autumn sugarcane in standing rice produced 33 and 35 % more cane and sugar yield, respectively, with 42 % higher returns besides 79 % energy saving. This practice may grossly benefit cane growers and sugar mill owners alike in the Indian subtropics, particularly in rice-growing and low-lying areas of eastern Uttar Pradesh and north Bihar.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bachchhav, S.M. 2005. Fertigation technology for increasing sugarcane production. Indian Journal of Fertilizers 1(4): 85–89. Cochran, W.G., and G.M. Cox. 1957. Experimental designs, 2nd ed, 611. New York: Wiley. Clark, L.J., W.R. Whalley, and P.B. Baraclough. 2003. How do roots penetrate strong soil? Plant and Soil 255: 93–104. Cole, R.C. 1939. Soil macro-structure as affected by cultural treatments. Hilgardia 12: 427–472. Das, T.K. 2002. Skip-row planting for higher photosynthetic efficiency. ICAR News 8(3): 14. Dhiman, S.D., Hari Om, and H. Kumar. 2001. Advantage and limitation of zero tillage in wheat. Indian Farming 51: 8–10. Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. Spencer, G.L., and G.P. Meade. 1955. Cane sugar handbook. A manual for cane sugar manufacturers and their chemists. New York: Wiley. Tomar, S.S., and A.S. Tiwari. 1990. Production potential and economics of different crop sequences. Indian Journal of Agronomy 35(1&2): 30–35. Verma, R.S., M.P. Motiwale, R.S. Chauhan, and R.K. Tiwari. 1981. Studies on intercropping of spices and tobacco with autumn sugarcane. Indian Sugar 31(7): 451–456. Verma, S.P., and S.C. Modgal. 1983. Production potential and economics of fertilizer application as a resource constraints in maize-wheat crop sequences. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 9(2): 89–92.