Enhancement of an Auto-Injector Device for Self-Administration of Etanercept in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Confers Emotional and Functional Benefits

Rheumatology and Therapy - Tập 7 - Trang 537-552 - 2020
Naceur Rekaya1, Steven M. Vicik1, Bors T. Hulesch2, Laura L. McDonald2
1Pfizer, Surrey, UK
2Brains and Cheek, London, UK

Tóm tắt

Etanercept is effective in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and can be self-administered via an auto-injector. While these devices are generally well accepted, some patients are not comfortable with the process of self-administration; this has been cited as a reason for discontinuation of biologic treatment. Alternative routes of administration (e.g., infusion) are more resource intensive. The aim of this analysis was to explore the attributes of auto-injection devices that impact patient confidence and ability to self-administer. Patients with RA (n = 168) and healthcare providers (n = 82) in Belgium, Germany, Japan, Spain, and the UK were interviewed (n = 250 overall). Mock injection procedures were carried out using an auto-injector device with the addition of a sleeve with a wider rubber grip. Importance of and performance of the device against a range attributes were captured using a Likert scale (1–7). Disease severity was captured using the Cochin hand function scale. Device attributes reported by patients to be most important were ‘use without assistance’ ‘ease of administration’, ‘ease of operation’, and ‘ease of grip’. The device with additional sleeve performed strongly against these attributes, scoring 6.9 (out of 7), 6.8, 6.8, and 6.6, respectively with no difference observed between countries. Nurses and physicians reported similar responses. Qualitatively, patients reported that stability and grip provided a sense of control and reduced anxiety. Similar overall ‘ease of operation’ was reported between patients with mild (n = 89) or moderate/severe (n = 71) disease (score 6.4 vs. 6.5, respectively). The auto-injector plus sleeve performed strongly against key attributes even in patients with moderate/severe RA and patients with reduced grip strength. The robust grip improved patient confidence and reduced injection-related anxiety. This may be beneficial in patients who are anxious about self-administration, those new to self-administration, and potentially in patients with reduced hand dexterity as a result of either advanced disease or a painful day. Etanercept is a medicine used to treat rheumatoid arthritis that is given by injection. It can be delivered by patients themselves, in their own homes, using an auto-injection device that looks like a pen. Some patients are not comfortable with the process of self-injecting. Other patients have severe arthritis in their hands that stops them from carrying out self-injection. One auto-injection device (MyClic) has been enhanced by the addition of a sleeve that fits over the top of the pen. This was shown to 168 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, who already use the MyClic ‘pen’ and 82 doctors and nurses in five countries (Belgium, Germany, Japan, Spain, and the UK). Patients, nurses, and doctors said what they believed to be the most important features of a self-injection device. Generally, patients, nurses, and doctors from the different countries had similar views. Next, the participants scored the modified auto-injection device against those features. The device plus sleeve scored highly, meaning that patients, nurses, and doctors believed it would work well for the patient population tested. Many patients said that with the added sleeve, the self-injection device was more stable and they were able to grip it better. This helped to make patients feel in control and reduced any anxiety or fear they were feeling about their self-injection. This suggests that the sleeve is a useful addition and may be particularly useful for patients who are nervous about self-injection or have difficulty gripping self-injection devices because of their arthritis.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Tarp S, Furst DE, Dossing A, et al. Defining the optimal biological monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017;46(6):699–708. Singh JA, Hossain A, Tanjong Ghogomu E, Mudano AS, Tugwell P, Wells GA. Biologic or tofacitinib monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis in people with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) failure: a Cochrane Systematic Review and network meta-analysis (NMA). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:Cd012437. Michaud TL, Rho YH, Shamliyan T, Kuntz KM, Choi HK. The comparative safety of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis update of 44 trials. Am J Med. 2014;127(12):1208–32. Navarro-Millan I, Herrinton LJ, Chen L, Harrold L, Liu L, Curtis JR. Comparative effectiveness of etanercept and adalimumab in patient reported outcomes and injection-related tolerability. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0149781. Borras-Blasco J, Gracia-Perez A, Castera MD-E, Rosique-Robles J, Abad J. Educational session as a tool to increase patient satisfaction of switching etanercept from the prefilled syringe to the autoinjection pen. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13(8):1103–8. Borras-Blasco J, Gracia-Perez A, Rosique-Robles JD, Castera MD, Abad FJ. Acceptability of switching adalimumab from a prefilled syringe to an autoinjection pen. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10(3):301–7. Bolge SC, Goren A, Tandon N. Reasons for discontinuation of subcutaneous biologic therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a patient perspective. Patient Prefer Adher. 2015;9:121–31. van den Bemt BJF, Gettings L, Domanska B, Bruggraber R, Mountian I, Kristensen LE. A portfolio of biologic self-injection devices in rheumatology: how patient involvement in device design can improve treatment experience. Drug Deliv. 2019;26(1):384–92. Schiff M, Saunderson S, Mountian I, Hartley P. Chronic disease and self-injection: ethnographic investigations into the patient experience during treatment. Rheumatol Ther. 2017;4(2):445–63. Keininger D, Coteur G. Assessment of self-injection experience in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: psychometric validation of the Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:2. Nafradi L, Nakamoto K, Schulz PJ. Is patient empowerment the key to promote adherence? A systematic review of the relationship between self-efficacy, health locus of control and medication adherence. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186458. Sheikhzadeh A, Yoon J, Formosa D, Domanska B, Morgan D, Schiff M. The effect of a new syringe design on the ability of rheumatoid arthritis patients to inject a biological medication. Appl Ergonom. 2012;43(2):368–75. BHBIA guidelines. https://www.bhbia.org.uk/guidelines-and-legislation/legal-and-ethical-guidelines. Accessed 8 July 2019. Poiraudeau S, Lefevre-Colau MM, Fermanian J, Revel M. The ability of the Cochin rheumatoid arthritis hand functional scale to detect change during the course of disease. Arthritis Care Res. 2000;13(5):296–303. Duruoz M, Poiraudeau S. Development and validation of a rheumatoid hand functional disability scale that assesses functional handicap. J Rheumatol. 1996;23(7):1167–72. Thakur K, Biberger A, Handrich A, Rezk MF. Patient perceptions and preferences of two etanercept auto-injectors for rheumatoid arthritis: findings from a patient survey in Europe. Rheumatol Ther. 2016;3(2):245–56. Tischer B, Mehl A. Patients’ and nurses’ preferences for auto-injectors for rheumatoid arthritis: results of a European survey. Patient Prefer Adher. 2018;12:1413–24. Hudry C, Lebrun A, Moura B, Zinovieva E, Backers O, Herman-Demars H. Evaluation of usability and acceptance of a new auto-injector intended for methotrexate subcutaneous self-administration in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2017;4(1):183–94. Thomson R, Martin JL, Sharples S. The psychosocial impact of home use medical devices on the lives of older people: a qualitative study. BMC health Serv Res. 2013;13:467.