Engineering membrane electrode assembly for advanced polymer electrolyte water electrolyzer

Glenk G, Reichelstein S. Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen. Nat Energy, 2019, 4: 216–222 Lu S, Zhuang Z. Electrocatalysts for hydrogen oxidation and evolution reactions. Sci China Mater, 2016, 59: 217–238 International Energy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review 2021. IEA Technical Report. 2021 Dhabi A. Green hydrogen cost reduction: Scaling up electrolysers to meet the 1.5 °C climate goal. International Renewable Energy Agency Technical Report. 2020 Abbasi R, Setzler BP, Lin S, et al. A roadmap to low-cost hydrogen with hydroxide exchange membrane electrolyzers. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 1805876 Miller HA, Bouzek K, Hnat J, et al. Green hydrogen from anion exchange membrane water electrolysis: A review of recent developments in critical materials and operating conditions. Sustain Energy Fuels, 2020, 4: 2114–2133 Schmidt O, Gambhir A, Staffell I, et al. Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 30470–30492 Saba SM, Müller M, Robinius M, et al. The investment costs of electrolysis—A comparison of cost studies from the past 30 years. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43: 1209–1223 Mayyas A, Ruth M, Pivovar B, et al. Manufacturing cost analysis for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. NREL/TP-6A20-72740 Technical Report. 2019 Li C, Baek JB. The promise of hydrogen production from alkaline anion exchange membrane electrolyzers. Nano Energy, 2021, 87: 106162 Li GF, Yang D, Abel Chuang PY. Defining nafion ionomer roles for enhancing alkaline oxygen evolution electrocatalysis. ACS Catal, 2018, 8: 11688–11698 Fang B, Chaudhari NK, Kim MS, et al. Homogeneous deposition of platinum nanoparticles on carbon black for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J Am Chem Soc, 2009, 131: 15330–15338 Antolini E. Carbon supports for low-temperature fuel cell catalysts. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2009, 88: 1–24 Wu X, Scott K. RuO2 supported on Sb-doped SnO2 nanoparticles for polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysers. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36: 5806–5810 Mazúr P, Polonský J, Paidar M, et al. Non-conductive TiO2 as the anode catalyst support for PEM water electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 12081–12088 Kúš P, Ostroverkh A, Ševčíková K, et al. Magnetron sputtered Ir thin film on TiC-based support sublayer as low-loading anode catalyst for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41: 15124–15132 Nikiforov AV, Tomás García AL, Petrushina IM, et al. Preparation and study of IrO2/SiC-Si supported anode catalyst for high temperature PEM steam electrolysers. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36: 5797–5805 Kondo T, Kikuchi M, Masuda H, et al. Boron-doped diamond powder as a durable support for platinum-based cathode catalysts in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc, 2018, 165: F3072–F3077 Polonský J, Petrushina IM, Christensen E, et al. Tantalum carbide as a novel support material for anode electrocatalysts in polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysers. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 2173–2181 Schuler T, Ciccone JM, Krentscher B, et al. Hierarchically structured porous transport layers for polymer electrolyte water electrolysis. Adv Energy Mater, 2019, 10: 1903216 Faustini M, Giraud M, Jones D, et al. Hierarchically structured ultraporous Iridium-based materials: A novel catalyst architecture for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Adv Energy Mater, 2019, 9: 1802136 Oh HS, Nong HN, Reier T, et al. Oxide-supported Ir nanodendrites with high activity and durability for the oxygen evolution reaction in acid PEM water electrolyzers. Chem Sci, 2015, 6: 3321–3328 Fang Z, Lee MS, Kim JY, et al. The effect of carbon support surface functionalization on PEM fuel cell performance, durability, and ionomer coverage in the catalyst layer. J Electrochem Soc, 2020, 167: 064506 Gostick JT, Fowler MW, Ioannidis MA, et al. Capillary pressure and hydrophilic porosity in gas diffusion layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Power Sources, 2006, 156: 375–387 Han B, Mo J, Kang Z, et al. Effects of membrane electrode assembly properties on two-phase transport and performance in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells. Electrochim Acta, 2016, 188: 317–326 Wang J, Wang H. Flow-field designs of bipolar plates in PEM fuel cells: Theory and applications. Fuel Cells, 2012, 12: 989–1003 Maier M, Smith K, Dodwell J, et al. Mass transport in PEM water electrolysers: A review. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47: 30–56 Ito H, Maeda T, Nakano A, et al. Effect of flow regime of circulating water on a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 9550–9560 Abdin Z, Webb CJ, Gray EMA. Modelling and simulation of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyser cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40: 13243–13257 Han B, Mo J, Kang Z, et al. Modeling of two-phase transport in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells for hydrogen energy. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 4478–4489 Cai C, Rao Y, Zhou J, et al. Carbon corrosion: A novel termination mechanism of the water electrolysis plateau during voltage reversal. J Power Sources, 2020, 473: 228542 Minke C, Suermann M, Bensmann B, et al. Is iridium demand a potential bottleneck in the realization of large-scale PEM water electrolysis? Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46: 23581–23590 Bernt M, Siebel A, Gasteiger HA. Analysis of voltage losses in PEM water electrolyzers with low platinum group metal loadings. J Electrochem Soc, 2018, 165: F305–F314 Kim H, Choe S, Park H, et al. An extremely low Pt loading cathode for a highly efficient proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer. Nanoscale, 2017, 9: 19045–19049 Xie S, Choi SI, Lu N, et al. Atomic layer-by-layer deposition of Pt on Pd nanocubes for catalysts with enhanced activity and durability toward oxygen reduction. Nano Lett, 2014, 14: 3570–3576 Liu C, Wang CC, Kei CC, et al. Atomic layer deposition of platinum nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes for application in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Small, 2009, 5: 1535–1538 Pan Y, Zhang C, Lin Y, et al. Electrocatalyst engineering and structure-activity relationship in hydrogen evolution reaction: From nanostructures to single atoms. Sci China Mater, 2020, 63: 921–948 Shang C, Cao C, Yu D, et al. Electron correlations engineer catalytic activity of pyrochlore iridates for acidic water oxidation. Adv Mater, 2018, 31: 1805104 Li H, Tsai C, Koh AL, et al. Activating and optimizing MoS2 basal planes for hydrogen evolution through the formation of strained sulphur vacancies. Nat Mater, 2016, 15: 48–53 Cheng Q, Hu C, Wang G, et al. Carbon-defect-driven electroless deposition of Pt atomic clusters for highly efficient hydrogen evolution. J Am Chem Soc, 2020, 142: 5594–5601 Liu K, Zhao X, Ren G, et al. Strong metal-support interaction promoted scalable production of thermally stable single-atom catalysts. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 1263 Joo J, Park YJ, Kim J, et al. Mn-dopant differentiating the Ru and Ir oxidation states in catalytic oxides toward durable oxygen evolution reaction in acidic electrolyte. Small Methods, 2022, 6: 2101236 Su J, Ge R, Jiang K, et al. Assembling ultrasmall copper-doped ruthenium oxide nanocrystals into hollow porous polyhedra: Highly robust electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution in acidic media. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1801351 An J, Kim YB, Prinz FB. Ultra-thin platinum catalytic electrodes fabricated by atomic layer deposition. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2013, 15: 7520–7525 Switzer JA. Atomic layer electrodeposition. Science, 2012, 338: 1300–1301 Wang JX, Inada H, Wu L, et al. Oxygen reduction on well-defined core-shell nanocatalysts: Particle size, facet, and Pt shell thickness effects. J Am Chem Soc, 2009, 131: 17298–17302 Song Z, Norouzi Banis M, Liu H, et al. Ultralow loading and high-performing Pt catalyst for a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell anode achieved by atomic layer deposition. ACS Catal, 2019, 9: 5365–5374 Lee WJ, Bera S, Kim CM, et al. Synthesis of highly dispersed Pt nanoparticles into carbon supports by fluidized bed reactor atomic layer deposition to boost pemfc performance. NPG Asia Mater, 2020, 12: 40 Cheng N, Stambula S, Wang D, et al. Platinum single-atom and cluster catalysis of the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 13638 Hsieh YC, Zhang Y, Su D, et al. Ordered bilayer ruthenium-platinum core-shell nanoparticles as carbon monoxide-tolerant fuel cell catalysts. Nat Commun, 2013, 4: 2466 Wang JX, Zhang Y, Capuano CB, et al. Ultralow charge-transfer resistance with ultralow Pt loading for hydrogen evolution and oxidation using Ru@Pt core-shell nanocatalysts. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 12220 Yarlagadda V, Carpenter MK, Moylan TE, et al. Boosting fuel cell performance with accessible carbon mesopores. ACS Energy Lett, 2018, 3: 618–621 Castanheira L, Silva WO, Lima FHB, et al. Carbon corrosion in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells: Effect of the carbon structure, the degradation protocol, and the gas atmosphere. ACS Catal, 2015, 5: 2184–2194 Forouzandeh F, Li X, Banham DW, et al. Understanding the corrosion resistance of meso- and micro-porous carbons for application in PEM fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc, 2018, 165: F3230–F3240 Kang S, Ham K, Lee J. Moderate oxophilic CoFe in carbon nanofiber for the oxygen evolution reaction in anion exchange membrane water electrolysis. Electrochim Acta, 2020, 353: 136521 Paunović P, Gogovska DS, Popovski O, et al. Preparation and characterization of Co-Ru/TiO2/MWCNTs electrocatalysts in PEM hydrogen electrolyzer. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36: 9405–9414 Shiva Kumar S, Ramakrishna SUB, Rama Devi B, et al. Phosphorus-doped graphene supported palladium (Pd/PG) electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction in PEM water electrolysis. Int J Green Energy, 2018, 15: 558–567 Song J, Wei C, Huang ZF, et al. A review on fundamentals for designing oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Chem Soc Rev, 2020, 49: 2196–2214 Hu S, Ge S, Liu H, et al. Low-dimensional electrocatalysts for acidic oxygen evolution: Intrinsic activity, high current density operation, and long-term stability. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32: 2201726 Cherevko S, Zeradjanin AR, Topalov AA, et al. Dissolution of noble metals during oxygen evolution in acidic media. ChemCatChem, 2014, 6: 2219–2223 Danilovic N, Subbaraman R, Chang KC, et al. Activity-stability trends for the oxygen evolution reaction on monometallic oxides in acidic environments. J Phys Chem Lett, 2014, 5: 2474–2478 Li G, Yu H, Wang X, et al. Highly effective IrxSn1−xO2 electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction in the solid polymer electrolyte water electrolyser. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2013, 15: 2858–2866 Pham CV, Bühler M, Knöppel J, et al. IrO2 coated TiO2 core-shell microparticles advance performance of low loading proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2020, 269: 118762 Marshall A, Sunde S, Tsypkin M, et al. Performance of a PEM water electrolysis cell using IrxRuyTazO2 electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution electrode. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32: 2320–2324 Kadakia K, Datta MK, Velikokhatnyi OI, et al. Novel (Ir,Sn,Nb)O2 anode electrocatalysts with reduced noble metal content for PEM based water electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 3001–3013 Sun W, Liu JY, Gong XQ, et al. OER activity manipulated by IrO6 coordination geometry: An insight from pyrochlore iridates. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 38429 Lin Y, Tian Z, Zhang L, et al. Chromium-ruthenium oxide solid solution electrocatalyst for highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction in acidic media. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 162 Kumari S, Ajayi BP, Kumar B, et al. A low-noble-metal W1−xIrxO3−δ water oxidation electrocatalyst for acidic media via rapid plasma synthesis. Energy Environ Sci, 2017, 10: 2432–2440 Zhou Z, Zaman WQ, Sun W, et al. Cultivating crystal lattice distortion in IrO2via coupling with MnO2 to boost the oxygen evolution reaction with high intrinsic activity. Chem Commun, 2018, 54: 4959–4962 Chen S, Huang H, Jiang P, et al. Mn-doped RuO2 nanocrystals as highly active electrocatalysts for enhanced oxygen evolution in acidic media. ACS Catal, 2019, 10: 1152–1160 Lee H, Kim JY, Lee SY, et al. Comparative study of catalytic activities among transition metal-doped IrO2 nanoparticles. Sci Rep, 2018, 8: 16777 Yang L, Chen H, Shi L, et al. Enhanced iridium mass activity of 6H-phase, Ir-based perovskite with nonprecious incorporation for acidic oxygen evolution electrocatalysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 42006–42013 Wen Y, Chen P, Wang L, et al. Stabilizing highly active Ru sites by suppressing lattice oxygen participation in acidic water oxidation. J Am Chem Soc, 2021, 143: 6482–6490 Pi Y, Shao Q, Wang P, et al. General formation of monodisperse IrM (M = Ni, Co, Fe) bimetallic nanoclusters as bifunctional electrocatalysts for acidic overall water splitting. Adv Funct Mater, 2017, 27: 1700886 Park DH, Kim MH, Lee HJ, et al. Development of Ni-Ir oxide composites as oxygen catalysts for an anion-exchange membrane water electrolyzer. Adv Mater Inter, 2022, 9: 2102063 Luo Y, Chiang SW, Tang L, et al. Manipulating electrocatalysis using mosaic catalysts. Small Sci, 2021, 1: 2000059 Lv H, Zhang G, Hao C, et al. Activity of IrO2 supported on tantalum-doped TiO2 electrocatalyst for solid polymer electrolyte water electrolyzer. RSC Adv, 2017, 7: 40427–40436 Hu W, Chen S, Xia Q. IrO2/Nb-TiO2 electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction in acidic medium. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39: 6967–6976 Gou W, Zhang M, Zou Y, et al. Iridium-chromium oxide nanowires as highly performed OER catalysts in acidic media. ChemCatChem, 2019, 11: 6008–6014 Ghadge SD, Patel PP, Datta MK, et al. Fluorine substituted (Mn,Ir)O2: F high performance solid solution oxygen evolution reaction electro-catalysts for PEM water electrolysis. RSC Adv, 2017, 7: 17311–17324 Aizaz Ud Din M, Irfan S, Dar SU, et al. Synthesis of 3D IrRuMn sphere as a superior oxygen evolution electrocatalyst in acidic environment. Chem Eur J, 2020, 26: 5662–5666 Kim J, Shih PC, Qin Y, et al. A porous pyrochlore Y2[Ru1.6Y0.4]O7−δ electrocatalyst for enhanced performance towards the oxygen evolution reaction in acidic media. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57: 13877–13881 Wang Y, Hou S, Ma R, et al. Modulating crystallinity and surface electronic structure of IrO2via gadolinium doping to promote acidic oxygen evolution. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2021, 9: 10710–10716 Tong J, Liu Y, Peng Q, et al. An efficient Sb-SnO2-supported IrO2 electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction in acidic medium. J Mater Sci, 2017, 52: 13427–13443 Yang L, Yu G, Ai X, et al. Efficient oxygen evolution electrocatalysis in acid by a perovskite with face-sharing IrO6 octahedral dimers. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 5236 Datta MK, Kadakia K, Velikokhatnyi OI, et al. High performance robust F-doped tin oxide based oxygen evolution electro-catalysts for PEM based water electrolysis. J Mater Chem A, 2013, 1: 4026–4037 Oh HS, Nong HN, Reier T, et al. Electrochemical catalyst-support effects and their stabilizing role for IrOx nanoparticle catalysts during the oxygen evolution reaction. J Am Chem Soc, 2016, 138: 12552–12563 Yun TG, Heo Y, Bin Bae H, et al. Elucidating intrinsic contribution of d-orbital states to oxygen evolution electrocatalysis in oxides. Nat Commun, 2021, 12: 824 Wang H, Lu Z, Xu S, et al. Electrochemical tuning of vertically aligned MoS2 nanofilms and its application in improving hydrogen evolution reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110: 19701–19706 Luo Y, Li X, Cai X, et al. Two-dimensional MoS2 confined Co(OH)2 electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution in alkaline electrolytes. ACS Nano, 2018, 12: 4565–4573 Wu MY, Da PF, Zhang T, et al. Designing hybrid NiP2/NiO nanorod arrays for efficient alkaline hydrogen evolution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10: 17896–17902 Kim J, Kim J, Kim H, et al. Nanoporous nickel phosphide cathode for a high-performance proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 30774–30785 Yao RQ, Zhou YT, Shi H, et al. Nanoporous surface high-entropy alloys as highly efficient multisite electrocatalysts for nonacidic hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31: 2009613 Luo Y, Zhang Z, Yang F, et al. Stabilized hydroxide-mediated nickelbased electrocatalysts for high-current-density hydrogen evolution in alkaline media. Energy Environ Sci, 2021, 14: 4610–4619 Seetharaman S, Balaji R, Ramya K, et al. Graphene oxide modified non-noble metal electrode for alkaline anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38: 14934–14942 Yu Q, Luo Y, Mahmood A, et al. Engineering two-dimensional materials and their heterostructures as high-performance electrocatalysts. Electrochem Energ Rev, 2019, 2: 373–394 Hinnemann B, Moses PG, Bonde J, et al. Biomimetic hydrogen evolution: MoS2 nanoparticles as catalyst for hydrogen evolution. J Am Chem Soc, 2005, 127: 5308–5309 Zhang C, Luo Y, Tan J, et al. High-throughput production of cheap mineral-based two-dimensional electrocatalysts for high-current-density hydrogen evolution. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 3724 Yang L, Wang D, Liu M, et al. Glue-assisted grinding exfoliation of large-size 2D materials for insulating thermal conduction and large-current-density hydrogen evolution. Mater Today, 2021, 51: 145–154 Zhang C, Tan J, Pan Y, et al. Mass production of 2D materials by intermediate-assisted grinding exfoliation. Natl Sci Rev, 2020, 7: 324–332 Holzapfel PKR, Bühler M, Escalera-López D, et al. Fabrication of a robust PEM water electrolyzer based on non-noble metal cathode catalyst: [Mo3S13]2− clusters anchored to N-doped carbon nanotubes. Small, 2020, 16: 2003161 King LA, Hubert MKA, Capuano C, et al. A non-precious metal hydrogen catalyst in a commercial polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyser. Nat Nanotechnol, 2019, 14: 1071–1074 Tajuddin AAH, Elumalai G, Xi Z, et al. Corrosion-resistant non-noble metal electrodes for PEM-type water electrolyzer. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46: 38603–38611 Huynh M, Bediako DK, Nocera DG. A functionally stable manganese oxide oxygen evolution catalyst in acid. J Am Chem Soc, 2014, 136: 6002–6010 Li A, Ooka H, Bonnet N, et al. Stable potential windows for long-term electrocatalysis by manganese oxides under acidic conditions. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2019, 58: 5054–5058 Li A, Kong S, Guo C, et al. Enhancing the stability of cobalt spinel oxide towards sustainable oxygen evolution in acid. Nat Catal, 2022, 5: 109–118 Henkensmeier D, Najibah M, Harms C, et al. Overview: State-of-the art commercial membranes for anion exchange membrane water electrolysis. J Electrochem Energy Convers Storage, 2021, 18: 024001 Xiao L, Zhang S, Pan J, et al. First implementation of alkaline polymer electrolyte water electrolysis working only with pure water. Energy Environ Sci, 2012, 5: 7869–7871 Ahn SH, Lee BS, Choi I, et al. Development of a membrane electrode assembly for alkaline water electrolysis by direct electrodeposition of nickel on carbon papers. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2014, 154–155: 197–205 Chen P, Hu X. High-efficiency anion exchange membrane water electrolysis employing non-noble metal catalysts. Adv Energy Mater, 2020, 10: 2002285 Razmjooei F, Morawietz T, Taghizadeh E, et al. Increasing the performance of an anion-exchange membrane electrolyzer operating in pure water with a nickel-based microporous layer. Joule, 2021, 5: 1776–1799 Krivina RA, Ou Y, Xu Q, et al. Oxygen electrocatalysis on mixed-metal oxides/oxyhydroxides: From fundamentals to membrane electrolyzer technology. Acc Mater Res, 2021, 2: 548–558 Xu D, Stevens MB, Cosby MR, et al. Earth-abundant oxygen electrocatalysts for alkaline anion-exchange-membrane water electrolysis: Effects of catalyst conductivity and comparison with performance in three-electrode cells. ACS Catal, 2018, 9: 7–15 Luo Y, Zhang S, Pan H, et al. Unsaturated single atoms on monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides for ultrafast hydrogen evolution. ACS Nano, 2020, 14: 767–776 Yu Q, Luo Y, Qiu S, et al. Tuning the hydrogen evolution performance of metallic 2D tantalum disulfide by interfacial engineering. ACS Nano, 2019, 13: 11874–11881 Tuaev X, Paraknowitsch JP, Illgen R, et al. Nitrogen-doped coatings on carbon nanotubes and their stabilizing effect on Pt nanoparticles. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2012, 14: 6444–6447 Yang SH, Ferreira P, la O’ GJ, et al. Coarsening of Pt nanoparticles in proton exchange membrane fuel cells upon potential cycling. ECS Trans, 2006, 1: 185–195 Pfeifer V, Jones TE, Velasco Vélez JJ, et al. In situ observation of reactive oxygen species forming on oxygen-evolving iridium surfaces. Chem Sci, 2017, 8: 2143–2149 Kötz R, Neff H, Stucki S. Anodic iridium oxide films: XPS-studies of oxidation state changes and O2 evolution. J Electrochem Soc, 1984, 131: 72–77 Cherevko S, Geiger S, Kasian O, et al. Oxygen evolution activity and stability of iridium in acidic media. Part 2.—Electrochemically grown hydrous iridium oxide. J Electroanal Chem, 2016, 774: 102–110 Fierro S, Kapałka A, Comninellis C. Electrochemical comparison between IrO2 prepared by thermal treatment of iridium metal and IrO2 prepared by thermal decomposition of H2IrCl6 solution. Electrochem Commun, 2010, 12: 172–174 Selamet OF, Pasaogullari U, Spernjak D, et al. Two-phase flow in a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer visualized in situ by simultaneous neutron radiography and optical imaging. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38: 5823–5835 Martelli GN, Ornelas R, Faita G. Deactivation mechanisms of oxygen evolving anodes at high current densities. Electrochim Acta, 1994, 39: 1551–1558 Yu H, Bonville L, Jankovic J, et al. Microscopic insights on the degradation of a PEM water electrolyzer with ultra-low catalyst loading. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2020, 260: 118194 Yu S, Li K, Wang W, et al. Tuning catalyst activation and utilization via controlled electrode patterning for low-loading and high-efficiency water electrolyzers. Small, 2022, 18: 2107745 Yu Q, Zhang Z, Qiu S, et al. A Ta-TaS2 monolith catalyst with robust and metallic interface for superior hydrogen evolution. Nat Commun, 2021, 12: 6051 Moysiadou A, Hu X. Stability profiles of transition metal oxides in the oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline medium. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7: 25865–25877 Li N, Bediako DK, Hadt RG, et al. Influence of iron doping on tetravalent nickel content in catalytic oxygen evolving films. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017, 114: 1486–1491 Hung SF, Hsu YY, Chang CJ, et al. Unraveling geometrical site confinement in highly efficient iron-doped electrocatalysts toward oxygen evolution reaction. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 1701686 Anantharaj S, Kundu S, Noda S. “The Fe effect”: A review unveiling the critical roles of Fe in enhancing OER activity of Ni and Co based catalysts. Nano Energy, 2021, 80: 105514 Cao X, Novitski D, Holdcroft S. Visualization of hydroxide ion formation upon electrolytic water splitting in an anion exchange membrane. ACS Mater Lett, 2019, 1: 362–366 Xu J, Liu G, Li J, et al. The electrocatalytic properties of an IrO2/SnO2 catalyst using SnO2 as a support and an assisting reagent for the oxygen evolution reaction. Electrochim Acta, 2012, 59: 105–112 Cheng J, Zhang H, Chen G, et al. Study of IrxRu1−xO2 oxides as anodic electrocatalysts for solid polymer electrolyte water electrolysis. Electrochim Acta, 2009, 54: 6250–6256 Antonucci V, Di Blasi A, Baglio V, et al. High temperature operation of a composite membrane-based solid polymer electrolyte water electrolyser. Electrochim Acta, 2008, 53: 7350–7356 Millet P, Dragoe D, Grigoriev S, et al. Genhypem: A research program on PEM water electrolysis supported by the european commission. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34: 4974–4982 Cheng J, Zhang H, Ma H, et al. Preparation of Ir0.4Ru0.6MoxOy for oxygen evolution by modified adams’ fusion method. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34: 6609–6613 Song S, Zhang H, Ma X, et al. Electrochemical investigation of electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in PEM water electrolyzers. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33: 4955–4961 Song S, Zhang H, Liu B, et al. An improved catalyst-coated membrane structure for PEM water electrolyzer. Electrochem Solid-State Lett, 2007, 10: B122 Marshall A, Børresen B, Hagen G, et al. Electrochemical characterisation of IxSn1−xO2 powders as oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Electrochim Acta, 2006, 51: 3161–3167 Millet P, Ngameni R, Grigoriev SA, et al. PEM water electrolyzers: From electrocatalysis to stack development. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 5043–5052 Leng Y, Chen G, Mendoza AJ, et al. Solid-state water electrolysis with an alkaline membrane. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134: 9054–9057 Su X, Gao L, Hu L, et al. Novel piperidinium functionalized anionic membrane for alkaline polymer electrolysis with excellent electrochemical properties. J Membrane Sci, 2019, 581: 283–292 Parrondo J, Arges CG, Niedzwiecki M, et al. Degradation of anion exchange membranes used for hydrogen production by ultrapure water electrolysis. RSC Adv, 2014, 4: 9875–9879 Lindquist GA, Oener SZ, Krivina R, et al. Performance and durability of pure-water-fed anion exchange membrane electrolyzers using baseline materials and operation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13: 51917–51924 Koshikawa H, Murase H, Hayashi T, et al. Single nanometer-sized NiFe-layered double hydroxides as anode catalyst in anion exchange membrane water electrolysis cell with energy conversion efficiency of 74.7% at 1.0 A cm−2. ACS Catal, 2020, 10: 1886–1893 Chen HY, Chen GC, Liao KW, et al. Island-type hybrid catalysts applied for anion exchange membrane water electrolysis. Catalysts, 2022, 12: 102 Faid AY, Barnett AO, Seland F, et al. Tuning Ni-MoO2 catalyst-ionomer and electrolyte interaction for water electrolyzers with anion exchange membranes. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2021, 4: 3327–3340 Jang MJ, Yang J, Jeong J, et al. Promotion effect of modified Ni/C by La-Ce oxide for durable hydrogen evolution reaction. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2021, 9: 12508–12513 Pandiarajan T, John Berchmans L, Ravichandran S. Fabrication of spinel ferrite based alkaline anion exchange membrane water electrolysers for hydrogen production. RSC Adv, 2015, 5: 34100–34108 Park YS, Jeong J, Noh Y, et al. Commercial anion exchange membrane water electrolyzer stack through non-precious metal electrocatalysts. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2021, 292: 120170 Busacca C, Zignani SC, Di Blasi A, et al. Electrospun NiMn2O4 and NiCo2O4 spinel oxides supported on carbon nanofibers as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in an anion exchange membrane-based electrolysis cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44: 20987–20996 Li D, Park EJ, Zhu W, et al. Highly quaternized polystyrene ionomers for high performance anion exchange membrane water electrolysers. Nat Energy, 2020, 5: 378–385 Morawietz T, Handl M, Oldani C, et al. High-resolution analysis of ionomer loss in catalytic layers after operation. J Electrochem Soc, 2018, 165: F3139–F3147 Orfanidi A, Rheinländer PJ, Schulte N, et al. Ink solvent dependence of the ionomer distribution in the catalyst layer of a PEMFC. J Electrochem Soc, 2018, 165: F1254–F1263 Lee JH, Doo G, Kwon SH, et al. Dispersion-solvent control of ionomer aggregation in a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Sci Rep, 2018, 8: 10739 Kim TH, Yoo JH, Maiyalagan T, et al. Influence of the nafion agglomerate morphology on the water-uptake behavior and fuel cell performance in the proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Appl Surf Sci, 2019, 481: 777–784 Sharma R, Andersen SM. Zoom in catalyst/ionomer interface in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell electrodes: Impact of catalyst/ ionomer dispersion media/solvent. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10: 38125–38133 Trinke P, Keeley GP, Carmo M, et al. Elucidating the effect of mass transport resistances on hydrogen crossover and cell performance in pem water electrolyzers by varying the cathode ionomer content. J Electrochem Soc, 2019, 166: F465–F471 Salvatore DA, Gabardo CM, Reyes A, et al. Designing anion exchange membranes for CO2 electrolysers. Nat Energy, 2021, 6: 339–348 Varcoe JR, Atanassov P, Dekel DR, et al. Anion-exchange membranes in electrochemical energy systems. Energy Environ Sci, 2014, 7: 3135–3191 Díaz JC, Kamcev J. Ionic conductivity of ion-exchange membranes: Measurement techniques and salt concentration dependence. J Membrane Sci, 2021, 618: 118718 Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking. 2019 Annual Work Plan and Budget. FCHJU Technical Report. 2019 Li N, Zhang Q, Wang C, et al. Phenyltrimethylammonium functionalized polysulfone anion exchange membranes. Macromolecules, 2012, 45: 2411–2419 Li N, Yan T, Li Z, et al. Comb-shaped polymers to enhance hydroxide transport in anion exchange membranes. Energy Environ Sci, 2012, 5: 7888–7892 Li L, Lin CX, Wang XQ, et al. Highly conductive anion exchange membranes with long flexible multication spacer. J Membrane Sci, 2018, 553: 209–217 Hao J, Gao X, Jiang Y, et al. Crosslinked high-performance anion exchange membranes based on poly(styrene-b-(ethylene-co-butylene)-b-styrene). J Membrane Sci, 2018, 551: 66–75 Abouzari-Lotf E, Jacob MV, Ghassemi H, et al. Highly conductive anion exchange membranes based on polymer networks containing imidazolium functionalised side chains. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 3764 Chandesris M, Médeau V, Guillet N, et al. Membrane degradation in PEM water electrolyzer: Numerical modeling and experimental evidence of the influence of temperature and current density. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40: 1353–1366 Salarizadeh P, Javanbakht M, Askari MB, et al. Novel proton conducting core-shell PAMPS-PVBS@Fe2TiO5 nanoparticles as a reinforcement for SPEEK based membranes. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 4926 Wang HH, Hu C, Park JH, et al. Reinforced poly(fluorenyl-co-terphenyl piperidinium) anion exchange membranes for fuel cells. J Membrane Sci, 2022, 644: 120160 Huang Z, Lv B, Zhou L, et al. Ultra-thin h-BN doped high sulfonation sulfonated poly(ether-ether-ketone) of PTFE-reinforced proton exchange membrane. J Membrane Sci, 2022, 644: 120099 Siracusano S, Baglio V, Stassi A, et al. Performance analysis of short-side-chain aquivion perfluorosulfonic acid polymer for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. J Membrane Sci, 2014, 466: 1–7 Yu TH, Sha Y, Liu WG, et al. Mechanism for degradation of nafion in PEM fuel cells from quantum mechanics calculations. J Am Chem Soc, 2011, 133: 19857–19863 Escobedo G, Raiford K, Nagarajan GS, et al. Strategies for mitigation of PFSA polymer degradation in PEM fuel cells. ECS Trans, 2006, 1: 303–311 Dekel DR, Willdorf S, Ash U, et al. The critical relation between chemical stability of cations and water in anion exchange membrane fuel cells environment. J Power Sources, 2018, 375: 351–360 Curtin DE, Lousenberg RD, Henry TJ, et al. Advanced materials for improved PEMFC performance and life. J Power Sources, 2004, 131: 41–48 Yu J, Yi B, Xing D, et al. Degradation mechanism of polystyrene sulfonic acid membrane and application of its composite membranes in fuel cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2003, 5: 611–615 Haugen GM, Meng F, Aieta NV, et al. The Effect of heteropoly acids on stability of PFSA PEMs under fuel cell operation. Electrochem Solid-State Lett, 2007, 10: B51 Ramani V, Kunz HR, Fenton JM. Stabilized composite membranes and membrane electrode assemblies for elevated temperature/low relative humidity PEFC operation. J Power Sources, 2005, 152: 182–188 Edson JB, Macomber CS, Pivovar BS, et al. Hydroxide based decomposition pathways of alkyltrimethylammonium cations. J Membrane Sci, 2012, 399–400: 49–59 Mohanty AD, Bae C. Mechanistic analysis of ammonium cation stability for alkaline exchange membrane fuel cells. J Mater Chem A, 2014, 2: 17314–17320 Noh S, Jeon JY, Adhikari S, et al. Molecular engineering of hydroxide conducting polymers for anion exchange membranes in electrochemical energy conversion technology. Acc Chem Res, 2019, 52: 2745–2755 Lin B, Dong H, Li Y, et al. Alkaline stable C2-substituted imidazolium-based anion-exchange membranes. Chem Mater, 2013, 25: 1858–1867 Gu S, Cai R, Luo T, et al. Quaternary phosphonium-based polymers as hydroxide exchange membranes. ChemSusChem, 2010, 3: 555–558 Gu S, Wang J, Kaspar RB, et al. Permethyl cobaltocenium (Cp*2Co+) as an ultra-stable cation for polymer hydroxide-exchange membranes. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 11668 Romulus J, Henssler JT, Weck M. Postpolymerization modification of block copolymers. Macromolecules, 2014, 47: 5437–5449 Lee WH, Kim YS, Bae C. Robust hydroxide ion conducting poly(biphenyl alkylene)s for alkaline fuel cell membranes. ACS Macro Lett, 2015, 4: 814–818 Karim MR, Hatakeyama K, Matsui T, et al. Graphene oxide nanosheet with high proton conductivity. J Am Chem Soc, 2013, 135: 8097–8100 Sun P, Ma R, Bai X, et al. Single-layer nanosheets with exceptionally high and anisotropic hydroxyl ion conductivity. Sci Adv, 2017, 3: e1602629 Liu J, Yu L, Cai X, et al. Sandwiching h-BN monolayer films between sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) and nafion for proton exchange membranes with improved ion selectivity. ACS Nano, 2019, 13: 2094 Shao JJ, Raidongia K, Koltonow AR, et al. Self-assembled two-dimensional nanofluidic proton channels with high thermal stability. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 7602 Ding L, Wei Y, Wang Y, et al. A two-dimensional lamellar membrane: MXene nanosheet stacks. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2017, 56: 1825–1829 Qian X, Chen L, Yin L, et al. CdPS3 nanosheets-based membrane with high proton conductivity enabled by Cd vacancies. Science, 2020, 370: 596–600 Xie Z, Navessin T, Shi K, et al. Functionally graded cathode catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc, 2005, 152: A1171 Kim K, Kim H, Lee K, et al. Effect of nafion® gradient in dual catalyst layer on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33: 2783–2789 Klingele M, Breitwieser M, Zengerle R, et al. Direct deposition of proton exchange membranes enabling high performance hydrogen fuel cells. J Mater Chem A, 2015, 3: 11239–11245 Bühler M, Klose C, Hegge F, et al. A novel fabrication technique for electrodes of PEM water electrolyzers. ECS Trans, 2017, 80: 1069–1075 Choi WC, Kim JD, Woo SI. Modification of proton conducting membrane for reducing methanol crossover in a direct-methanol fuel cell. J Power Sources, 2001, 96: 411–414 Jang S, Kim M, Kang YS, et al. Facile multiscale patterning by creep-assisted sequential imprinting and fuel cell application. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8: 11459–11465 Bae JW, Cho YH, Sung YE, et al. Performance enhancement of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell by employing line-patterned nafion membrane. J Industrial Eng Chem, 2012, 18: 876–879 Lee DH, Yun GT, Doo G, et al. Hierarchical wrinkle-structured catalyst layer/membrane interface for ultralow Pt-loading polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Nano Lett, 2022, 22: 1174–1182 Joseph D, Büsselmann J, Harms C, et al. Porous nafion membranes. J Membrane Sci, 2016, 520: 723–730 Hizir FE, Ural SO, Kumbur EC, et al. Characterization of interfacial morphology in polymer electrolyte fuel cells: Micro-porous layer and catalyst layer surfaces. J Power Sources, 2010, 195: 3463–3471 Aoyama Y, Suzuki K, Tabe Y, et al. Water transport and PEFC performance with different interface structure between micro-porous layer and catalyst layer. J Electrochem Soc, 2016, 163: F359–F366 Zhang X, Shao J, Huang W, et al. Three dimensional carbon substrate materials for electrolysis of water. Sci China Mater, 2018, 61: 1143–1153 Debe MK. Tutorial on the fundamental characteristics and practical properties of nanostructured thin film (NSTF) catalysts. J Electrochem Soc, 2013, 160: F522–F534 Xie Z, Yu S, Yang G, et al. Ultrathin platinum nanowire based electrodes for high-efficiency hydrogen generation in practical electrolyzer cells. Chem Eng J, 2021, 410: 128333 Park YS, Lee JH, Jang MJ, et al. Co3S4 nanosheets on Ni foam via electrodeposition with sulfurization as highly active electrocatalysts for anion exchange membrane electrolyzer. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45: 36–45 Luo Y, Tang L, Khan U, et al. Morphology and surface chemistry engineering toward pH-universal catalysts for hydrogen evolution at high current density. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 269 Yang F, Luo Y, Yu Q, et al. A durable and efficient electrocatalyst for saline water splitting with current density exceeding 2000 mA cm−2. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31: 2010367 Siemens Energy. Overview of the PEM Silyzer Family. Siemens Technical Report. 2020