Engineering design principles as patterns of relationships in frame creation
Tóm tắt
Frame creation (framing) faces the challenge of envisioning novel viewpoints that point to value. This paper examines framing and uses Dorst’s definition of frame from the perspective of engineering design theories and methods to highlight three of their key characteristics: (P1) problem-domain independence, (P2) generativity, and (P3) formal definition of a valuable design outcome or process in terms of principles. These properties support two statements. Statement 1: an engineering design theory or method satisfying (P1), (P2) and (P3) holds Dorst’s definition of frame. The design principles on which the engineering design theory or method is based on are the pattern of relationships that characterizes valuable outcomes and processes in that frame. Statement 2: when a designer uses an engineering design theory or method satisfying (P3), the interaction between the design problem frame (A) and the engineering design theory or method frame (B), uncovers a new frame (C) with a definition of value. Illustrative examples based on axiomatic design and C-K theory demonstrate the practical application of these statements.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Altshuller G (1996) And suddenly the inventor appeared. TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving. Technical Innovation Center, Inc, Worcester
Araujo CS, Benedetto-Neto H, Campello AC, Segre FM, Wright IC (1996) The utilization of product development methods: a survey of UK industry. J Eng Des 7:265–277
Archer LB (1960) Systematic method for designers. In: Cross N (ed) Developments in design methodology. Wiley, New York, pp 57–81
Atman CJ, Adams RS, Cardella ME, Turns J, Mosborg S, Saleem J (2007) Engineering design processes: a comparison of students and expert practitioners. J Eng Educ 96:359–379
Bayazit N (2004) Investigating design: a review of forty years of design research. Des Issues 20:16–29
Benavides EM (2011) Woodhead Publishing in Mechanical Engineering: Advanced engineering design: an integrated approach. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
Benavides EM, Lara-Rapp O (2019) Ideal output for a robust conceptual design process. J Eng Des 30:103–154
Benavides EM, Rodriguez JB (2016) New developments to guide strategic product design and systematic innovation. In: Farid A, Suh NP (eds) Axiomatic design in large systems. Springer, Cham, pp 81–104
Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Des Issues 8:5–21
Buchanan R (2009) Thinking about design: an historical perspective. In: Meijers A (ed) Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 409–453
Chechurin L, Borgianni Y (2016) Understanding TRIZ through the review of top cited publications. Comput Ind 82:119–134
Chen C, Crilly N (2016) Describing complex design practices with a cross-domain framework: learning from synthetic biology and swarm robotics. Res Eng Des 27:291–305
Crilly N, Cardoso C (2017) Where next for research on fixation, inspiration and creativity in design? Des Stud 50:1–38
Cross N (2004) Expertise in design: an overview. Des Stud 25:427–441
Cross N (2007) Forty years of design research. Des Stud 28:1–4
Cross N (2008) Engineering design methods: strategies for product design. Wiley, Chichester
Cross AC, Cross N (1996) Winning by design: the methods of Gordon Murray, racing car designer. Des Stud 17:91–107
Dong A, Lovallo D, Mounarath R (2015) The effect of abductive reasoning on concept selection decisions. Des Stud 37:37–58
Dorst K (2008) Design research: a revolution-waiting-to-happen. Des Stud 29:4–11
Dorst K (2011) The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Des Stud 32:521–532
Dorst K (2015a) Frame creation and design in the expanded field. She Ji J Des Econ Innov 1:22–33
Dorst K (2015b) Frame innovation. Create new thinking by design. MIT Press, Cambridge
Dorst K, Dijkhuis J (1995) Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Des Stud 16:261–274
Dyckson A, Dyson J (2016) How we made the Dyson vacuum cleaner. The Guardian.
Eder WE (1995) Viewpoint Engineering design—art, science and relationships. Des Stud 16:117–127
Eder WE (2011) Engineering design science and theory of technical systems: legacy of Vladimir Hubka. J Eng Des 22:361–385
Eekels J (2000) On the fundamentals of engineering design science: the geography of engineering design science. Part 1. J Eng Des 11:377–397
Evbuomwan N, Sivaloganathan S, Jebb A (1996) A survey of design philosophies, models, methods and systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 210:301–320
Farrell R (2015) Designing and sciencing: response to Galle and Kroes. Des Stud 37:1–12
Farrell R, Hooker C (2012) The Simon–Kroes model of technical artifacts and the distinction between science and design. Des Stud 33:480–495
Farrell R, Hooker C (2013) Design, science and wicked problems. Des Stud 34:681–705
Felk Y, Le Masson P, Weil B, Cogez P, Hatchuel A (2011) Designing patent portfolio for disruptive innovation—a new methodology based on CK theory. 214–225
Finger S, Dixon JR (1989) A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part I: descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes. Res Eng Des 1:51–67
Friedman K, Solterman E (2015) series foreword. In: Dorst K (ed) Anonymous frame innovation. Create new thinking by design. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 6–9
Fu KK, Yang MC, Wood KL (2016) Design principles: literature review, analysis, and future directions. J Mech Des 138:101103
Gadd K (2011) TRIZ for engineers: enabling inventive problem solving. Wiley, Chichester
Galle P, Kroes P (2014) Science and design: identical twins? Des Stud 35:201–231
Hatchuel A, Weil B (2003) A new approach of innovative design: an introduction to CK theory
Hatchuel A, Weil B (2009) C-K design theory: an advanced formulation. Res Eng Des 19:181–192
Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Reich Y, Weil B (2011) A systematic approach of design theories using generativeness and robustness. 87–97
Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Reich Y, Subrahmanian E (2018) Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering. Res Eng Des 29:5–21
Hazelrigg GA (1998) A framework for decision-based engineering design. J Mech Des 120:653–658
Horváth I (2004) A treatise on order in engineering design research. Res Eng Des 15:155–181
Kannengiesser U, Gero J (2015) Is designing independent of domain? Comparing models of engineering, software and service design. Res Eng Des 26:253–275
Kolko J (2010) Abductive thinking and sensemaking: the drivers of design synthesis. Des Issues 26:15–28
Kroll E (2013) Design theory and conceptual design: contrasting functional decomposition and morphology with parameter analysis. Res Eng Des 24:165–183
Kroll E, Condoor SS, Jansson DG (2001) Innovative conceptual design: theory and application of parameter analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lara-Rapp O, Benavides EM (2015) Ideal design process characterization: the impact of preliminary decision-making tools in the consumption of resources and its uncertainty. Res Eng Des 26:97–119
Le Masson P, Dorst K, Subrahamanian E (2013) Special issue on design theory: history, state of the arts and advancements. Res Eng Des 24:212–243
Linsey JS, Tseng I, Fu K, Cagan J, Wood KL, Schunn C (2010) A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. J Mech Des 132:041003
Lloyd P (2017) From design methods to future-focused thinking: 50 years of design research. Des Stud 48:A1–A8
Lloyd P, Scott P (1994) Discovering the design problem. Des Stud 15:125–140
Norman DA, Stappers PJ (2015) DesignX: complex sociotechnical systems. She Ji J Des Econ Innov 1:83–106
Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley, Hoboken
Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Bernarda G, Smith A, Papadakos T (2014) Value proposition design: how to create products and services customers want: get started with. Wiley, Hoboken
Papalambros PY (2015) Design science: why, what and how. Des Sci 1:e1
Paton B, Dorst K (2011) Briefing and reframing: a situated practice. Des Stud 32:573–587
Pettersen S, Erikstad S, Asbjørnslett B (2018) Exploiting latent functional capabilities for resilience in design of engineering systems. Res Eng Des 29:605–619
Reich Y (2010) My method is better. Res Eng Des 21:137–142
Reich Y (2013) Designing science. Res Eng Des 24:215–218
Reich Y, Subrahmanian E (2017) The PSI Matrix—a framework and a theory of design. Des Theory Res Methodol 7
Reich Y, Hatchuel A, Shai O, Subrahmanian E (2012) A theoretical analysis of creativity methods in engineering design: casting and improving ASIT within C-K theory. J Eng Des 23:137–158
Rodriguez JB, Benavides EM (2014) Axiomatic design as a consultancy tool in product design. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on axiomatic design, pp 133–139
Roy R (1993) Case studies of creativity in innovative product development. Des Stud 14:423–443
Roy R (2016) A story of innovation, the cyclone vacuum cleaner invented by James Dyson. Creative Academic Magazine, Oxford
Schon DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York
Seabrook J (2010) How to make it. The New Yorker
Shai O, Reich Y (2004a) Infused design. I. Theory. Res Eng Des 15:93–107
Shai O, Reich Y (2004b) Infused design. II. Practice. Res Eng Des 15:108–121
Shai O, Reich Y, Rubin D (2009b) Creative conceptual design: extending the scope by infused design. Comput Aided Des 41:117–135
Shai O, Reich Y, Hatchuel A, Subrahmanian E (2009) Creativity theories and scientific discovery: a study of CK theory and infused design
Simon HA (1970) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge
Soo Meng JC (2009) Donald Schön, Herbert Simon and the sciences of the artificial. Des Stud 30:60–68
Suh NP (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press, New York
Taguchi G, Elsayed EJ, Hsiang TC (1989) Quality engineering in production systems. McGraw-Hill, New York
Weisbrod G, Kroll E (2018) Idea–configuration–evaluation (ICE): development and demonstration of a new prescriptive model of the conceptual engineering design process based on parameter analysis and C-K theory. Res Eng Des 29:203–225
Zhu X (2011) Environment designer—Quo Vadis. In: All Design, pp 16–23