Engineering design applications of surrogate-assisted optimization techniques

András Sóbester1, Alexander I. J. Forrester1, David J. J. Toal1, Es Tresidder2, Simon Tucker2
1Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
2Graduate School of the Environment, Centre for Alternative Technology, Machynlleth, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ashill P, Fulker J (1987) Calculation of the viscous and vortex drag components of wing/body configurations. RAE Technical Report TR 87028

Brebner G, Wyatt L (1961) Boundary layer measurements at low speed on two wings of 45 and 55 degrees sweep. Tech. Rep. ARC-CP-554, Aeronautical Research Council

Cherkassky V, Mulier F (1998) Learning from data—concepts, theory, and methods. Wiley, New York

Chung H, Alonso J (2002) Using gradients to construct Cokriging approximation models for high-dimensional design optimization problems. In: AIAA 40th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, AIAA-2002-0317, Reno, NV

Coley D, Schukat S (2002) Low-energy design: combining computer-based optimisation and human judgement. Build Environ 37(12):1241–1247

Communities, Government L (2009) Improving the energy efficiency of our homes and buildings: energy certificates and air-conditioning inspections for buildings. http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/714826.pdf . Accessed Dec 2009

Crawley D, Lawrie L, Winkelmann F, Buhl W, Huang Y, Pedersen C, Strand R, Liesen R, Fisher D, Witte M, Glazer J (2001) Energyplus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy Build 33:319–331

Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

ESDU (2002) Full-potential (FP) method for three-dimensional wings and wing-body combinations—inviscid flow part 1: principles and results. ESDU-02013, London

ESDU (2008) Wing viscous drag coefficient in shock-free attached flow. ESDU-07002, London

Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ (2008) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45(1–3):50–79

Forrester AIJ, Sóbester A, Keane AJ (2007) Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling. Proc R Soc A 463(2088):3251–3269

Forrester AIJ, Sóbester A, Keane AJ (2008) Engineering design via surrogate modeling—a practical guide. Wiley, New York

Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2001) The elements of statistical learning. Springer, Berlin

Hicks RM, Henne PA (1978) Wing design by numerical optimization. J Aircr 15:407–412

Johnson ME, Moore LM, Ylvisaker D (1990) Minimax and maximin distance designs. J Stat Plan Inference 26:131–148

Jones DR (2001) A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces. J Glob Optim 21:345–383

Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J Glob Optim 13(4):455–492

Keane AJ (2006) Statistical improvement criteria for use in multiobjective design optimization. AIAA J 44(4):879–891

Kennedy MC, O’Hagan A (2000) Predicting the output from complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87(1):1–13

Krajewski WF (1987) Cokriging radar-rainfall and rain-gauge data. J Geophys Res, Atmos 92(D8):9571–9580

Krige DG (1951) A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the witwatersrand. J Chem Metall Min Soc S Afr 52(6):119–139

Kulfan BM (2008) Universal parametric geometry representation method. J Aircr 45(1):142–158. doi: 10.2514/1.29958

Lock R (1985) Prediction of the drag of wings at subsonic speeds by viscous/inviscid interaction techniques. Paper 10, AGARD Report 723

Matheron G (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Econ Geol 58:1246–1266

McKay MD, Conover WJ, Beckman RJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21:239–245

Morris MD, Mitchell TJ (1995) Exploratory designs for computational experiments. J Stat Plan Inference 43:381–402

Neymark J, Judkoff R, Knabe G, Le H, Rig M, Glass A, Zweifel G (2002) Applying the building energy simulation test (BESTEST) diagnostic method to verification of space conditioning equipment models used in whole-building energy simulation programs. Energy Build 34:917–931

Samareh J (2001) Survey of shape parameterization techniques for high-fidelity multidisciplinary shape optimization. AIAA J 29(5):877–884

Schonlau M (1997) Computer experiments and global optimization. Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Simpson T, Mistree F (2001) Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA J 39(12):2233–2241

Sóbester A (2009) Concise airfoil representation via case-based knowledge capture. AIAA J 47(5):1209–1218

Sóbester A, Leary SJ, Keane AJ (2003) On the design of optimization strategies based on global response surface approximation models. J Glob Optim 33(1):31–59

Toal D (2009) Proper orthogonal decomposition and Kriging strategies for design. Ph.D. thesis

Toal DJJ, Forrester AIJ, Bressloff NW, Keane AJ, Holden CME (2009) An adjoint for likelihood maximization. Proc R Soc A 465(2111):3267–3287. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2009.0096

USDE (2010) Energy plus simulation tool. Available to download at http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/ . Accessed Mar 2010

Wang W, Zmeureanu R, Rivard H (2005) Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization. Build Environ 40:1512–1525

Welch WJ, Buck RJ, Sacks J, Wynn HP, Mitchell TJ, Morris MD (1992) Screening, predicting, and computer experiments. Technometrics 34:15–25

Wright A, Loosemore H, Farmani R (2002) Optimization of building thermal design and control by multi-criterion genetic algorithm. Energy Build 34:959–972