Engineering and the Problem of Moral Overload
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(1), 1–16.
Chang, R. (Ed.). (1997). Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reasoning. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Cummings, M. L. (2006). Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 701–715.
Flanagan, M., Howe, D. C., & Nissenbaum, H. (2008). Embodying values in technology. Theory and practise. In J. Van, J. den Hoven, & J. Weckert (Eds.), Information technology and moral philosophy (pp. 322–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. J., & Borning, A. (2006). Value sensitive design and information systems. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations (Vol. 5, pp. 348–372, Advances in mangement information systems). Armonk, NY: M.E, Sharpe.
Jonsen, A. R., & Toulmin, S. (1988). The abuse of casuistry. A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kuran, T. (1998). Moral overload and its alleviation. In A. Ben-Ner & L. Putterman (Eds.), Economics, values, organization (pp. 231–266). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levi, I. (1986). Hard Choices. Decion making under unresolved conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marino, P. (2001). Moral dilemmas, collective responsibility, and moral progress. Philosophical Studies, 104, 203–225.
Pacey, A. (1983). The culture of technology. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richardson, H. S. (1997). Practical reasoning about final ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rooksby, E. (2009). How to be a responsible slave: Managing the use of expert information systems. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(1), 81–90.
Sarewitz, D. R. (1996). Frontiers of illusion: Science, technology, and the politics of progress. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Swierstra, T., Stemerding, D., & Boenink, M. (2009). Exploring techno-moral change. The case of the obesitypill. In P. Sollie & M. Düwell (Eds.), Evaluating new technologies (pp. 119–138). Dordrecht: Springer.
Taebi, B., & Kadak, A. C. (2010). Intergenerational considerations affecting the future of nuclear power: Equity as a framework for assessing fuel cycles. Risk Analysis, 30(9), 1341–1362, doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01434.x .
Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(7), 320–324.
Van de Poel, I. (2009). Values in engineering design. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science. Volume 9: Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences (pp. 973–1006). Oxford: Elsevier.
Van den Hoven, J. (1998). Moral responsibility, public office and information technology. In Snellen & V.d. Donk (Eds.), Public administration in an information age. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Van den Hoven, J. (2005). Design for values and values for design. Information Age, 4–7.
Van den Hoven, J. (2008). Moral methodology and information technology. In H. Tavani & K. Himma (Eds.), Handbook of computer ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
WCED. (1987). Our common future. Report of the world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weinberg, A. M. (1966). Can technology replace social engineering? In A. H. Teich (Ed.), Technology and the future (Vol. 59, pp. 55–64). New York: St.Martin’s Press.