Engineering and labor specialization during the industrial revolution

Cliometrica - Tập 8 - Trang 173-200 - 2013
Darrell J. Glaser1, Ahmed S. Rahman1
1Department of Economics, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, USA

Tóm tắt

This paper explores how technological changes affected labor allocations within the U.S. Navy. During the latter nineteenth century, the officer corps was highly specialized, split between groups of line and staff officers. Developments in general purpose technologies created a dilemma for the organization, as it balanced between the benefits of a specialized workforce implementing increasingly complex technologies with rising communication and coordination costs. We first document the nature and extent of labor specialization in the mid-nineteenth-century Navy—engineers worked more with newer and larger vessels, while line officers worked more with unskilled personnel. The Navy endeavored to destroy this distinction, forcing generalized training and tasks for all officers. We suggest that the Navy’s phased-in approach was an effective strategy, helping the U.S. to become a world-class naval power.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Acemoglu D (2007) Equilibrium bias of technology. Econometrica 75(5):1371–1409 Allen JM (1976) Corporate values invade the navy: the growth of modern American sea power 1861–1882. Dissertation, Syracuse University Autor DH (2001) Wiring the labor market. J Econ Perspect 15(1):25–40 Bennett FM (1896) The steam navy of the United States—a history of the growth of the steam vessel of war in the navy, and of the naval engineer corps. Warren and Co. Publishers, Pittsburgh PA Blank DM, Stigler GJ (1957) ‘The demand and supply of scientific personnel. No. 62 General Series: National Bureau of Economic Research Borghans L, ter Weel B (2006) The division of labour, worker organization, and technological change. Econ J 116(509):F45–F72 Buhl LC (1978) Maintaining an American Navy, 1865–1889. In: Hagan KJ (ed) Peace and war: interpretations of American naval history-30th anniversary edition (2008). Praeger Security International, London Chin A, Juhn C, Thompson P (2006) Technical change and the demand for skills during the second industrial revolution: evidence from the merchant marine, 1891–1912. Rev Econ Stat 88(3):572–578 Calvert Monte A (1967) The mechanical engineer in America, 1830–1910: professional cultures in conflict. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Coletta PE (1987) A survey of U.S. naval affairs, 1865–1917. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD Davis LE, Engerman SL (2006) Naval blockades in peace and war: an economic history since 1750. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Glaser DJ, Rahman AS (2011) Human capital and technological transition—insights from the U.S. navy. J Econ Hist 71(3):704–729 Glaser DJ, Rahman AS (2012) ‘Returns to skill in an era of rapid technological innovation. USNA Department of Economics Working Paper Goldin C, Katz LF (1998) The origins of technology-skill complementarity. Quart J Econ 113(3):693–732 Hackemer K (2001) The U.S. navy and the origins of the military-industrial complex, 1847–1883. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MD Hadfield GK (1999) A coordination model of the sexual division of labor. J Econ Behav Organ 40(2):125–153 Houthakker H (1956) Economics and biology: specialization and speciation. Kyklos 9:181–189 Karsten Peter M (1972) The naval aristocracy: the golden age of Annapolis and the emergence of modern American navalism. First Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MD Kim S (1989) Labor specialization and the extent of the market. J Polit Econ 97:692–705 Kim S, Mohtadi H (1992) Labor specialization and endogenous growth. Am Econ Rev 82(2):404–408 Kremer M (1993) The O-ring theory of economic development. Quart J Econ 108(3):551–575 Lipsey R, Bekar C, Carlaw K (1998) General purpose technologies: what requires explanation? In: Helpman E (ed) General purpose technologies and economic growth. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA McBride WM (1992) Strategic determinism in technology selection: the electric battleship and US naval-industrial relations. Technol Cult 33:248–277 McBride WM (2000) Technological change and the United States navy, 1865–1945. John Hopkins University Press, London Modelski G, Thompson WR (1988) Seapower in global politics, 1494–1993. University of Washington Press, Seattle Mokyr J (2002) The gifts of Athena. Oxford University Press, New York Mokyr J, The American Council of Learned Societies (1990) The lever of riches. Oxford University Press, New York Paret P (1989) In: Paret P (ed) Makers of modern strategy: from machiavelli to the nuclear age. Princeton University Press, Priceton, NJ Reinhart CM, Rogoff Kenneth S (2009) This time is different: eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ Rosenberg N, Trajtenberg M (2004) A general purpose technology at work: the corliss steam engine in the late 19th-century U.S. J Econ Hist 64(1):61–99 Smith E (1938) A short history of naval and marine engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK Sternad D (2011) Strategic adaptation: cross-cultural differences in company responses to an economic crisis. Springer, Wien Tomblin BB (1988) From sail to steam: the development of steam technology in the United States navy, 1838–1865. New Rutgers University, Brunswick Vlahos ME (1989) The making of an American style. In: King RW (ed) Naval engineering and American sea power. The Nautical and Aviation Publishing Company of America Inc, Baltimore Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13(3):339–351