Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement

Computers & Education - Tập 54 Số 4 - Trang 1222-1232 - 2010
Pu‐Shih Daniel Chen1, Amber D. Dumford2, Kevin R. Guidry2
1Department of Counseling and Higher Education, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #310829, Denton, TX 76203-5017, USA
2Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Allen, 2008

Austin, 1993

Bersin, 2004

Bråten, 2006, Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of Internet-based learning activities, Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 1027, 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.026

Bernard, 2004, How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature, Review of Educational Research, 74, 379, 10.3102/00346543074003379

Bullen, 1998, Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education, Journal of Distance Education, 13, 1

Carini, 2006, Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages, Research in Higher Education, 47, 1, 10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9

Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2009). Basic classification. <http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/index.asp?key=791>.

Chen, P. D., Ted, I., & Davis, L. K. (2007). Engaging African American students: Compare student engagement and student satisfaction at HBCUs and their self-identified PWIs using National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) data. In Paper presented at the 32nd annual conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Louisville, KY. Indiana University Bloomington, Center for Postsecondary Research. <http://cpr.iub.edu/uploads/Engaging%20African%20American%20Students%20ASHE.pdf>.

Chickering, 1987, Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education, AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3

Chickering, 1996, Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever, AAHE Bulletin, 3

Clark, R. E. (2009). Past and future research in online education. In Paper presented at the 2009 annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego, California. <http://www.cogtech.usc.edu/aera_09.php>.

Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. Learning & training innovations newsline. <http://www.ltinewsline.com/ltimagazine/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=11755>.

Duderstadt, 2002

Ehrmann, 2004, Beyond computer literacy: Implications of technology for the content of a college education, Liberal Education, 90, 6

Ellison, N. (2007). Facebook use on campus: A social capital perspective on social network sites. In Program presented at the sixth annual ECAR symposium, Boca Raton, FL.

Gladieux, 1999

Graham, 2006, Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions, 3

Green, K. (2007). The 2007 campus computing survey. <http://www.campuscomputing.net/sites/www.campuscomputing.net/files/2007-CCP_0.pdf>.

Hawkins, B. L., & Rudy, J. A. (2008). EDUCAUSE core data service fiscal year 2007 summary report. <http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB8005.pdf>.

Hu, 2001, Computing experience and good practices in undergraduate education: Does the degree of campus “wiredness” matter?, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9

Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research (2008a). Institutional report 2008. Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. <http://nsse.iub.edu/2008_Institutional_Report/>.

Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. (2008b). Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within 2008 results. Bloomington, IN. <http://nsse.iub.edu/NSSE_2008_Results/docs/withhold/NSSE2008_Results_revised_11-14-2008.pdf>.

Jenkins, 2006

Kuh, G. D. (2004). The National Survey Of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. <http://nsse.iub.edu/2004_annual_report/pdf/2004_Conceptual_Framework.pdf>.

Kuh, 2001, The relationships between computer and information technology use, student learning, and other college experiences, Journal of College Student Development, 42, 217

Kuh, 2001, Do computers enhance or detract from student learning?, Research in Higher Education, 42, 87, 10.1023/A:1018768612002

LaNasa, 2009, The construct validity of student engagement: A confirmatory factor analysis approach, Research in Higher Education, 50, 315, 10.1007/s11162-009-9123-1

LaPadula, 2003, A comprehensive look at online student support services for distance learners, The American Journal of Distance Education, 17, 119, 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1702_4

Means, 2009

Nelson Laird, 2005, Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement, Research in Higher Education, 46, 211, 10.1007/s11162-004-1600-y

Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). Measuring deep approaches to learning using the National Survey of Student Engagement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL. <http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/conference_presentations/2006/AIR2006DeepLearningFINAL.pdf>.

Ouimet, 2004, Using focus groups, expert advice, and cognitive interviews to establish the validity of a college student survey, Research in Higher Education, 45, 233, 10.1023/B:RIHE.0000019588.05470.78

Pace, 1980, Measuring the quality of student effort, Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 10

Parsad, 2008

Pascarella, E. T., & Seifert, T. A. (2008). Validation of the NSSE benchmarks and deep approaches to learning against liberal arts outcomes. Wabash College, Center for Inquiry in the Liberal Arts <http://www.wabashnationalstudy.org/files/2008ashevalidationofnssebenchmarkslinked.pdf.

Pascarella, 2005

Pike, 2006, The convergent and discriminant validity of NSSE scalelet scores, Journal of College Student Development, 47, 550, 10.1353/csd.2006.0061

Raudenbush, 2002

Reay, 2001, Blended learning: A fusion for the future, Knowledge Management Review, 4, 6

Robinson, 2008, New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning, Journal of Education for Business, 84, 101, 10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109

Rossett, 2001

Salaway, G., & Caruso, J. B. (2008). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. <http://www.educause.edu/ECAR/TheECARStudyofUndergraduateStu/163283>.

Sanders, 2006, The “imponderable bloom”: Reconsidering the role of technology in education, Innovate Journal of Online Education, 2

Sands, 2002, Inside outside, upside downside: Strategies for connecting online and face-to-face instruction in hybrid courses, Teaching with Technology Today, 8

Siegel, 1988

Sitzmann, 2006, The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis, Personnel Psychology, 59, 623, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00049.x

Tabachnick, 2007

Terrell, 2000, An investigation of the effect of learning style on student success in an online learning environment, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28, 231, 10.2190/R53M-BVBD-UGV5-77EH

Thurmond, 2004, Understanding interactions in distance education: A review of the literature, International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 1, 9

Ward, 2003, Blended learning: The convergence of e-learning and meetings, Franchising World, 35, 22

Ward, 1998, Use of the Web in undergraduate teaching, Computers and Education, 31, 171, 10.1016/S0360-1315(98)00024-4

Zhou, 2008, Web 2.0 impact on student learning process, 2880