Endarterectomized superficial femoral artery joint to reversed saphenous vein bypass for lower extremity revascularization
Tóm tắt
Autogenous saphenous vein is the preferred graft material for femorodistal revascularization. Doubt remains, however, about what material to use when the vein is neither available nor adequate. The authors report their experience with 15 patients aged from fifty-one to eighty years in whom, in the absence of a suitable saphenous vein, were performed a combined revascularization with endarterectomy in the proximal segment joint to a bypass with reversed saphenous vein in the distal tract. With a follow-up ranging from 8 to 17 months, the 1-year patency rate was 73.3%, whereas the limb salvage rate was 80%. The authors believe this technique is an acceptable alternative for femorodistal reconstruction in patients without a suitable saphenous vein.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bennion RS, Williams RA, Stabile BE, et al: Patency of autogenous saphenous vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in femoropopliteal bypass for advanced ischemia of the extremity. Surg Gynecol Obstet 160:239–242, 1985.
Bergan JJ, Yao JST, Graham LM: Prosthetic grafts for the treatment of lower limb ischemia: Present status. Br J Surg 69 (suppl) S334-S37, 1982.
Bergan JJ, Veith FJ, Bernhard VM, et al: Randomization of autogenous vein and polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in femoro-distal reconstruction. Surgery 92:921–930, 1982.
Cranley JJ, Hafner CD: Newer prosthetic material compared with autogenous saphenous vein for occlusive arterial disease of the lower extremity. Surgery 89:2–7, 1981.
Davis RK, Bosher LP, Brown PW, et al: Lower extremity arterial revascularization with autogenous ectopic vein. In: Current Critical Problems in Vascular Surgery, ed. by Veith FJ. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing Inc., 1989, pp 52–57.
Giessler R: Vascular reconstruction. In: Vascular Surgery, ed. by Herber G, van Dongen RJAM. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1989, pp 71–85.
Green RM, Ouriel K, Ricotta JJ, et al: Revision of failed infrainguinal bypass graft: Principles of management. Surgery 100:646, 1988.
Hobson RW II, O’Donnell JA, Jamil Z, et al: Below-knee bypass for limb salvage. Comparisons of autogenous saphenous vein, polytetrafluoroethylene and composite Dacron-autogenous vein grafts. Arch Surg 115:833–837, 1980.
Legemate DA, Ackerstaff RGA, Eickelboom BC: Duplex scanning in cerebral, abdominal and peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Surg 3:287–295, 1989.
Liekweg WG Jr, Greenfield LG: Vascular prosthetic infections: Collected experience and results of treatment. Surgery 81:335–341, 1977.
Schroeder TV, Jensen LP, Nielson OM, et al: Femoral-infrapopliteal polytetrafluoroethylene graft bypass for limb salvage. In: Perspectives in Vascular Surgery, ed. by Goldstone J. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, Inc. 1991, pp 82–86.
Taylor LM Jr, Phinney ES, Porter JM: Present status of reversed vein bypass for lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg 3:288–297, 1986.
Veith FJ, Gupta SE, Ascer E, et al: Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 3:104–114, 1986.
Walker PM, Imparato AM, Riles TM, et al: Long-term results in superficial femoral artery endarterectomy. Surgery 89:23–30, 1981.
Weisel RD, Johnston KW, Baird RJ, et al: Comparison of conduits for leg revascularization. Surgery 89:8–15, 1981.
Yeager RA, Hobson RW, Jamil Z, et al: Differential patency and limb salvage for polytetrafluoroethylene and autogenous saphenous vein in severe lower extremity ischemia. Surgery 91:99–103, 1982.