Enacting Organizational Justice and Institutional Learning in Faculty Dispute Resolution Processes: Lessons Learned from a Study of the UNC System

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 32 - Trang 167-195 - 2020
Sandie Gravett1, Stella Anderson1
1Appalachian State University, Boone, USA

Tóm tắt

This study examines dispute resolution processes available to higher education faculty in a nonunion context who are attempting to resolve adverse employment conditions. It assesses the efficacy of those processes for producing outcomes of value both to individual faculty members and to a university. Key areas of interest include faculty knowledge about and levels of confidence in campus systems for dispute resolution, how campuses prepare for and conduct hearings, and the potential for dispute resolution processes to enact organizational justice and produce institutional learning. A survey of faculty affiliated with the 16 constituent higher education institutions of The University of North Carolina and interviews conducted with faculty having direct experience with campus hearings provided data to examine these issues. The data indicates that for dispute resolutions processes to function effectively, there must be greater support of persons engaged in the processes, additional training for administrators, advisors and hearing panel members, and increased transparency in reaching and reporting the outcomes of these processes.

Tài liệu tham khảo

AAUP Data Snapshot: Contingent Faculty in U.S. Higher Ed. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/10112018%20Data%20Snapshot%20Tenure.pdf AAUP Statement on government of colleges and universities. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/report/statement-government-colleges-and-universities. AAUW (n.d.) Know Your Rights at Work: Tenure, Title VII, and Title IX. Retrieved from https://www.aauw.org/what-we-do/legal-resources/know-your-rights-on-campus/tenure/. American Arbitration Association (1995). Employment Due Process Protocol. Retrieved from https://www.adr.org/sites/default/files/document_repository/Employment%20Due%20Process%20Protocol_0.pdf Appalachian State University Faculty Handbook. (2019). Retrieved from https://facultyhandbook.appstate.edu/sites/facultyhandbook.appstate.edu/files/faculty_han dbook_2019.pdf. Azvolinsky, A. (2017). Dealing with unethical or illegal conduct in higher education. The Scientist, Nov. 1. Retrieved from https://www.the-scientist.com/careers/dealing-withunethical-or-illegal-conduct-in-higher-education-30206. Beaudry, S., & Crockford, E. (2015). Resurrecting shared governance: A model to face uncertain times in higher education. Academy of Business Research Journal, 4, 32–44. Buller, J. L., & Cipriano, R. E. (2015). A toolkit for department chairs. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. CHE (Chronicle of Higher Education) Almanac. (2019). Tenure status of full-time and part-time Faculty members, Fall 2017. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Tenure-Status-of-Faculty/246310 COACHE Faculty job satisfaction survey. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://coache.gse.harvard.edu/faculty-job-satisfaction-survey. Collinson, V., & Cook, T. F. (2007). Organizational learning : Improving learning, teaching, and leading in school systems. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Colquitt, J. (2012). Organizational justice. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 526–547). New York: Oxford University Press. Colquitt, J., & Greenberg, J. (2005). Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah: Psychology Press. Crookston, K (2012). Working with problem Faculty: A six-step guide for department chairs. John Wiley & Sons. Curnalia, R. M. L., & Mermer, D. (2018). Renewing our commitment to tenure, academic freedom, and shared governance to navigate challenges in higher education. Review of Communication, 18(2), 129–139. de Montigny, G. (2011). “Put on a happy face”: Tenure, grievance, and governance. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 125, 1–39. Diamond, A. (2017). Social media policies and academic freedom: Higher education Faculty and administrator perceptions. Retrieved from https://commons.cuportland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article =1028&context=edudissertations ECU Faculty Counselors. (2019). Retrieved from http://www.ecu.edu/csacad/fsonline/customcf/rosters/facultycounselors.pdf Eigen, Z. J., & Litwin, A. S. (2014). Justice or just between us? Empirical evidence of the trade-off between procedural and interactional justice in workplace dispute resolution. ILR Review, 67(1), 171–201. Eisenberg, D. T. (2016). The restorative workplace: An organizational learning approach to discrimination, 487-556. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2549&context=fa c_pubs. Flood, J. T., & Leap, T. L. (2018). Managing risk in high-stakes Faculty employment decisions. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Gerber, L. G. (2014). The rise and decline of Faculty governance: Professionalization and the modern American University. John Hopkins University Press. Goodman, N. (2017). Conclusion: Working together to share governance. In S. F. Cramer (Ed.) Shared Governance in Higher Education: Demands, Transitions, Transformations. Volume 1, SUNY Press. Hancks, M. L. (2013). Faculty perceptions of conflict with administrators: An analysis of the associations between the nature of conflict and positive and negative outcomes. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3bf5/201812818ed6ed999d50c748b22206f5586b.pdf Haraway, W. M. (2005). Employee grievance programs: Understanding the Nexus between workplace justice, organizational legitimacy and successful organizations. Public Personnel Management, 34(4), 329–342. Hoffmann, E. A. (2012). Co-operative workplace dispute resolution: Organizational structure, ownership, and ideology. London: Routledge. Holzweiss, P., & Walker, D. (2018). Higher education crises: Training new professionals for crisis management. College Student Affairs Journal, 36(1), 124–135. Hudson, D. L. (2017). Public employees, private speech: 1st amendment doesn't always protect government workers, ABA Journal, May 1. IOA - International Ombudsman Association (n.d.) What is an organizational ombuds. Retrieved from https://www.ombudsassociation.org/what-is-an-organizational-ombuds. Jones, W., Hutchens, N., Hulbert, A., Lewis, W., & Brown, D. (2017). Shared governance among the new majority: Non-tenure track Faculty eligibility for election to university Faculty senates. Innovative Higher Education, 42(5/6), 505–519. Katz, N. H. (2017). Mediation and dispute resolution services in higher education. In A. Georgakopoulos (Ed.), The mediation handbook: Research, theory and practice (pp. 170–178). New York: Routledge. Katz, H., Kochan, T., & Colvin, A. (2017). An Introduction to U.S. Collective Bargaining and Labor Relations. vol. 5th edition. ILR press. McCabe, D. M. (1998). Due process procedures in Faculty grievance codes. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(15), 1653–1662. Menkel-Meadow, C. (2016). Dispute processing and conflict resolution: Theory, practice, and policy. London: Routledge. NCSU Faculty and Staff Ombuds Office (2019). Ombuds Role Information. Retrieved from https://facultyombuds.ncsu.edu/files/2019/05/Ombuds-Role-Information.pdf. Nurse, L., & Devonish D. (2006). Grievance management and its links to workplace justice. Employee Relations, 29(1), 89–109. SACS: The Principles of Accreditation. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.sacscoc.org/pdf/2012PrinciplesOfAcreditation.pdf. Sirota, D., & Wolfson, A. (1972). Adequate grievance channels: Overcoming the negative effects of work measurement on employee morale. Human Resource Management, 11(2), 22–26. Stoessel, J. W. (2016). Social Media Policy Implications in Higher Education: Do Faculty, Administration, and Staff Have a Place in the “Social Network”? Retrieved from https://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3199&context=dissertations Turkel G. (2017). Collective bargaining, shared governance, and academic freedom: Creating policies for full-time non-tenure-track faculty at the University of Delaware. AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom, volume 8. Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/Turkel_2.pdf. UNC Code and Policy Manual. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.northcarolina.edu/apps/policy/index.php?tab=policy_manual. UNCC University Ombuds Office. Informal mediation. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ombuds.uncc.edu/informal-mediation. UNC-CH. (2017). Faculty Grievance Committee Report to the Faculty Council. Retrieved from https://facultygov.unc.edu/files/2017/02/2017FGC.pdf UNC System Office Data, Fall. (2018). https://www.northcarolina.edu/impact/stats-data-reports/. Watson, N. T., Rogers, K. S., Watson, K. L., & Liau, H. Y. C. (2018). Integrating social justice-based conflict resolution into higher education settings: Faculty, staff, and student professional development through mediation training. Conflict Resolution Quarterly. Webber, M., & Butovsky, J. (2018). Faculty associations confront accountability governance in Ontario universities. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 48(3), 165–181. Yarn, D. (2014). Designing a conflict management system for higher education: A case study for Design in Integrative Organizations. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 1, 83.