Enabling technologies influencing the start-up operations 5.0
Tóm tắt
The startup industry is experiencing a dynamic and exciting time called Startup 5.0, where technology is quickly transforming how we conduct business, and startups are at the vanguard of this change. This study aims to model the enabling technologies influencing start-up 5.0. The enabling technologies that impact start-up 5.0 are modelled in this research using TISM and MICMAC analysis. According to the findings, key enabling technologies that are changing the technical landscape and opening up new opportunities for Startup 5.0 are Edge computing, complex adaptive systems, network slicing, and 6G and beyond. Fostering effective innovation and entrepreneurial activity within the startup ecosystem requires an understanding of the dynamic relationships among various technologies. Our findings have implications for government decision-makers, entrepreneurs, and investors who want to support Startup 5.0’s expansion. This study emphasizes how crucial it is to understand how enabling technologies interact in order to enable well-informed strategies for fostering innovation and long-term entrepreneurial endeavors in the dynamic startup environment.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akundi A, Euresti D, Luna S, Ankobiah W, Lopes A, Edinbarough I (2022) State of Industry 5.0—Analysis and identification of current research trends. Appl Syst Innov 5(1):27.
Broo DG, Kaynak O, Sait SM (2022) Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0. J Indus Inform Integr 25:100311.
Carayannis EG, Morawska-Jancelewicz J (2022) The futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities. J Knowl Econ 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2
Chillayil J, Suresh M, Viswanathan PK, Kottayil SK (2021) Is imperfect evaluation a deterrent to adoption of energy audit recommendations? Int J Productivity Perform Manage 71(4):1385–1406. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2020-0236
Chowdhury MZ, Shahjalal M, Ahmed S, Jang YM (2020) 6G wireless communication systems: applications, requirements, technologies, challenges, and research directions. IEEE Open J Commun Soc 1:957–975. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCOMS.2020.3010270
Demir KA, Döven G, Sezen B (2019) Industry 5.0 and human-robot co-working. Procedia Comput Sci 158:688–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.104
Di Bona G, Cesarotti V, Arcese G, Gallo T (2021) Implementation of industry 4.0 technology: new opportunities and challenges for maintenance strategy. Procedia Comput Sci 180:424–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.258
Di Nardo M, Yu H (2021) Special issue “industry 5.0: The prelude to the sixth industrial revolution”. Appl Syst Innov 4(3):45.
Ghobakhloo M, Iranmanesh M, Mubarak MF, Mubarik M, Rejeb A, Nilashi M (2022) Identifying industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustain Prod Consumpt 33:716–737.
Haleem A, Javaid M (2019) Industry 5.0 and its applications in orthopaedics. J Clin Orthop Trauma 10(4):807–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.12.010
Higginbotham S (2020) What 5G hype gets wrong-[Internet of everything]. IEEE Spectr 57(3):22–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2020.9014454
Hossain MK, Thakur V, Mangla SK (2022) Modeling the emergency health-care supply chains: responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. J Bus Industrial Mark 37(8):1623–1639. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2020-0315
Huang S, Wang B, Li X, Zheng P, Mourtzis D, Wang L (2022) Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution. J Manuf Syst 64:424–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010
Jamil MIM (2023) An Overview and Synthesis of Entrepreneurial Theories for Start-Ups and MSMEs in the Era of Industry 5.0. Opportunities and Challenges of Business 5.0 in Emerging Markets, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6403-8.ch001
Javaid M, Haleem A (2020) Critical components of industry 5.0 towards a successful adoption in the field of manufacturing. J Industrial Integr Manage 5(03):327–348. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862220500141
Kumar R, Gupta P, Singh S, Jain D (2021) Human empowerment by Industry 5.0 in digital era: analysis of enablers. In Advances in Industrial and Production Engineering: Select Proceedings of FLAME 2020 (pp. 401–410). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4320-7_36
Lakshmi Priyadarsini S,M. Suresh (2020) Factors influencing the epidemiological characteristics of pandemic COVID 19: a TISM approach. Int J Healthc Manag 13(2):89–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2020.1755804
Lasi H, Fettke P, Kemper HG, Feld T, Hoffmann M (2014) Industry 4.0. Bus Inform Syst Eng 6:239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
Leng J, Sha W, Wang B, Zheng P, Zhuang C, Liu Q,... Wang L (2022) Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect. J Manufact Syst 65:279–295.
Li L (2018) China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: with a comparison of made-in-China 2025 and industry 4.0. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 135:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.028
Longo F, Padovano A, Umbrello S (2020) Value-oriented and ethical technology engineering in industry 5.0: a human-centric perspective for the design of the factory of the future. Appl Sci 10(12):4182. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124182
Loy ACM, Chin BLF, Sankaran R (2021) Industrial Revolution 1.0 and 2.0. The Prospect of Industry 5.0 in Biomanufacturing. CRC, pp 1–14
Lu Y (2017) Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J Industrial Inform Integr 6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005
Maddikunta PKR, Pham QV, Prabadevi B, Deepa N, Dev K, Gadekallu TR, Liyanage M (2022) Industry 5.0: a survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. J Industrial Inform Integr 26:100257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257
Madsen DØ, Berg T (2021) An exploratory bibliometric analysis of the birth and emergence of industry 5.0. Appl Syst Innov 4(4):87.
Mathivathanan D, Mathiyazhagan K, Rana NP, Khorana S, Dwivedi YK (2021) Barriers to the adoption of blockchain technology in business supply chains: A total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) approach. Int J Prod Res 59(11): 3338–3359.
Menon S, Suresh M (2019), October Total Interpretive Structural Modelling: Evolution and Applications. In International Conference on Innovative Data Communication Technologies and Application (pp. 257–265). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38040-3_30
Menon S, Suresh M (2020a) Enablers of workforce agility in engineering educational institutions. J Appl Res High Educ 13(2):504–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-12-2019-0304
Menon S, Suresh M (2020b) Factors influencing organizational agility in higher education. Benchmarking: Int J 28(1):307–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2020-0151
Metinko C (2021), July 27 Industry 5.0? Investors Again See The Promise In Industrial Automation After COVID-19. Retrieved from Crunchbase news: https://news.crunchbase.com/y-finance-crosspost/industrial-automation-startups-vc-investment/
Nahavandi S (2019) Industry 5.0—A human-centric solution. Sustainability 11(16):4371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164371
Orr A, Donovan J, Stoian D (2018) Smallholder value chains as complex adaptive systems: a conceptual framework. J Agribusiness Developing Emerg Economies 8(1):14–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-03-2017-0031
Patil M, Suresh M (2019) Modelling the enablers of workforce agility in IoT projects: a TISM approach. Global J Flex Syst Manage 20(2):157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00208-7
Pham QV, Fang F, Ha VN, Piran MJ, Le M, Le LB, Ding Z (2020) A survey of multi-access edge computing in 5G and beyond: fundamentals, technology integration, and state-of-the-art. IEEE Access 8:116974–117017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3001277
Piacentini RD, Vega M, Mujumdar AS (2021) Beyond industrial revolution 4.0: how industrial revolution 5.0 is related to drying technology. Drying Technol 39(4):437–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2021.1875185
Ramiya S, Suresh M (2021) Factors influencing lean-sustainable maintenance using TISM approach. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manage 12:1117–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01304-7
Santisteban J, Mauricio D (2017) Systematic literature review of critical success factors of information technology startups. Acad Entrepreneurship J 23(2):1–23
Satyanarayana K, Chandrashekar D, Mungila Hillemane BS (2021) An assessment of competitiveness of technology-based startups in India. Int J Global Bus Competitiveness 16(1):28–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-021-00023-x
Sharma M, Gupta R, Acharya P (2020) Prioritizing the critical factors of cloud computing adoption using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Glob Bus Rev 21(1):142–161.
Shi W, Cao J, Zhang Q, Li Y, Xu L (2016) Edge computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J 3(5):637–646. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198
Simões AC, Soares AL, Barros AC (2020) Factors influencing the intention of managers to adopt collaborative robots (cobots) in manufacturing organizations. J Eng Tech Manage 57:101574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101574
Skobelev PO, Borovik SY (2017) On the way from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: From digital manufacturing to digital society. Industry 4.0 2(6):307–311.
Sreenivasan A, Suresh M (2021) Modeling the enablers of sourcing risks faced by startups in COVID-19 era. J Global Oper Strategic Sourc 15(2):151–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-12-2020-0070
Sreenivasan A, Suresh M, Tuesta Panduro JA (2022) Modelling the resilience of start-ups during COVID-19 pandemic. Benchmarking: Int J. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2021-0530
Suresh M, Arun Ram Nathan, R.B. (2020) Readiness for lean procurement in construction projects. Constr Innov 20(4):587–608. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-07-2019-0067
Suresh M, Ganesh S, Raman R (2019a) Modelling the factors of agility of humanitarian operations. Int J Agile Syst Manag 12(2):108–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2019.100356
Suresh M, Mahadevan G, Abhishek RD (2019b) Modelling the factors influencing the service quality in supermarkets. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manage 10(6):1474–1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00897-4
Sushandoyo D, Kencanasari RAM, Prasetio EA, Matsuura Y (2022) The influences of Technological Capability and Market Orientation toward Business Model innovations of Digital startups. Int J Innov Manag 26(02):2250018. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919622500189
Thakur V (2021) Framework for PESTEL dimensions of sustainable healthcare waste management: Learnings from COVID-19 outbreak. J Clean Prod 287:125562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125562
Tripathi V, Chattopadhyaya S, Mukhopadhyay AK, Sharma S, Li C, Di Bona G (2022) A sustainable methodology using lean and smart manufacturing for the cleaner production of shop floor management in industry 4.0. Mathematics 10(3):347. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030347
Vaishnavi V, Suresh M (2020) Modelling of readiness factors for the implementation of lean six Sigma in healthcare organizations. Int J Lean Six Sigma 11(4):597–633. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-12-2017-0146
Vaishnavi V, Suresh M, Dutta P (2019a) A study on the influence of factors associated with organizational readiness for change in healthcare organizations using TISM. Benchmarking: Int J 26(4):1290–1313. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2018-0161
Vaishnavi V, Suresh M, Dutta P (2019b) Modelling the readiness factors for agility in healthcare organization: a TISM approach. Benchmarking: Int J 26(7):2372–2400. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2018-0172
Xu LD, Xu EL, Li L (2018) Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. Int J Prod Res 56(8):2941–2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806
Xu X, Lu Y, Vogel-Heuser B, Wang L (2021) Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. J Manufact Syst 61:530–535.
Zizic MC, Mladineo M, Gjeldum N, Celent L (2022) From industry 4.0 towards industry 5.0: A review and analysis of paradigm shift for the people, organization and technology. Energies 15(14):5221.