Enabling community-based metrology for wood-degrading fungi

Rolando Perez1, Marina Luccioni1, Rohinton T. Kamakaka2, Samuel Clamons3, Nathaniel J. Gaut4, Finn Stirling5, Katarzyna P. Adamala4, Pamela A. Silver5, Drew Endy1
1Department of Bioengineering, Schools of Engineering and Medicine, Stanford University, Room 252, Shriram Center, 443 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
2Department of MCD Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA
3Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biophysics, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd, MC 138-78, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA
4Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, 420 Washington Ave. SE, 5-178 MCB, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
5Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Avenue, Warren Alpert Building, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background Lignocellulosic biomass could support a greatly-expanded bioeconomy. Current strategies for using biomass typically rely on single-cell organisms and extensive ancillary equipment to produce precursors for downstream manufacturing processes. Alternative forms of bioproduction based on solid-state fermentation and wood-degrading fungi could enable more direct means of manufacture. However, basic methods for cultivating wood-degrading fungi are often ad hoc and not readily reproducible. Here, we developed standard reference strains, substrates, measurements, and methods sufficient to begin to enable reliable reuse of mycological materials and products in simple laboratory settings. Results We show that a widely-available and globally-regularized consumer product (Pringles™) can support the growth of wood-degrading fungi, and that growth on Pringles™-broth can be correlated with growth on media made from a fully-traceable and compositionally characterized substrate (National Institute of Standards and Technology Reference Material 8492 Eastern Cottonwood Whole Biomass Feedstock). We also establish a Relative Extension Unit (REU) framework that is designed to reduce variation in quantification of radial growth measurements. So enabled, we demonstrate that five laboratories were able to compare measurements of wood-fungus performance via a simple radial extension growth rate assay, and that our REU-based approach reduced variation in reported measurements by up to ~ 75%. Conclusions Reliable reuse of materials, measures, and methods is necessary to enable distributed bioproduction processes that can be adopted at all scales, from local to industrial. Our community-based measurement methods incentivize practitioners to coordinate the reuse of standard materials, methods, strains, and to share information supporting work with wood-degrading fungi.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Langholtz, B. M. H. J., Stokes, L. M. & Eaton. 2016 Billion-Ton Report Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy. 2016. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/12/f34/2016_billion_ton_report_12.2.16_0.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2020

Board, B. The Bioeconomy Initiative: Implementation Framework. 2017. https://biomassboard.gov/pdfs/Bioeconomy_Initiative_Implementation_Framework_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Carlson R. Estimating the biotech sector’s contribution to the US economy. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:247–55.

Carlson, R. Bioeconomy Capital: Bioeconomy Dashboard. 2019. https://www.bioeconomycapital.com/bioeconomy-dashboard. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

US Department of Agriculture. US Biobased Products Market Potential and Projections Through 2025, OCE-2008–01. 2008. https://www.usda.gov/oce/reports/energy/BiobasedReport2008.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Cumbers, J. The Bio-Belt : Growing the Future in Rural America. 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2019/07/15/the-bio-belt-growing-the-future-in-rural-america/#34369eed5461. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Liao JC, Mi L, Pontrelli S, Luo S. Fuelling the future: microbial engineering for the production of sustainable biofuels. Nat Publ Gr. 2016;14:288–304.

Floudas D, et al. The paleozoic origin of enzymatic lignin decomposition reconstructed from 31 fungal genomes. Science. 2012;336:1715–9.

Loyd AL, Held BW, Linder ER, Smith JA, Blanchette RA. Elucidating wood decomposition by four species of Ganoderma from the United States. Fungal Biol. 2018;122:254–63.

Ohm RA, et al. Genomics of wood-degrading fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;72:82–90.

Riley R, et al. Extensive sampling of basidiomycete genomes demonstrates inadequacy of the white-rot/brown-rot paradigm for wood decay fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:9923–8.

Grimm D, Wösten HAB. Mushroom cultivation in the circular economy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:7795–803.

Higgins C, Margot H, Warnquist S, Obeysekare E, Mehta K. Mushroom cultivation in the developing world: a comparison of cultivation technologies. In: GHTC 2017 - IEEE Glob. Humanit. Technol. Conf. Proc. 2017.

Bayer E. The mycelium revolution is upon us. Scientific American. 2019. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-mycelium-revolution-is-upon-us/. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Patrick S. The human mycobiome. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015; 103–122.

Chang Y, et al. Phylogenomic analyses indicate that early fungi evolved digesting cell walls of algal ancestors of land plants. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7:1590–601.

Hooker CA, Lee KZ, Solomon KV. Leveraging anaerobic fungi for biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019;59:103–10.

Fredericksen MA, et al. Three-dimensional visualization and a deep-learning model reveal complex fungal parasite networks in behaviourally manipulated ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114:12590–5.

Pawlowska TE, et al. Biology of fungi and their bacterial endosymbionts. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2018;56:289–309.

Marquez LM, Redman RS, Rodriguez RJ, Roossinck MJ. A virus in a fungus in a plant: three-way symbiosis required for thermal tolerance. Science. 2007;315:513–5.

Peay KG, Kennedy PG, Talbot JM. Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:434–47.

Riquelme M, et al. Architecture and development of the Neurospora crassa hypha—a model cell for polarized growth. Fungal Biol. 2011;115:446–74.

Moore D, Robson G, Trinci T. 21st century guidebook to fungi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.

Roper M, Lee CH, Hickey PC, Gladfelter AS. Life as a moving fluid: Fate of cytoplasmic macromolecules in dynamic fungal syncytia. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;26:116–22.

Kang X, et al. Molecular architecture of fungal cell walls revealed by solid-state NMR. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–12.

Kiss E, et al. Comparative genomics reveals the origin of fungal hyphae and multicellularity. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1–3.

Roper M, Dressaire E. Fungal biology: bidirectional communication across fungal networks. Curr Biol. 2019;29:R130–R132132.

Fleißner A, Herzog S. Signal exchange and integration during self-fusion in filamentous fungi. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;57:76–83.

Lehmann, A., Zheng, W., Soutschek, K. & Rillig, M. C. How to build a mycelium: tradeoffs in fungal architectural traits. bioRxiv. 2018; 361253.

Harris SD. Hyphal branching in filamentous fungi. Dev Biol. 2019;451:35–9.

Gehrmann T, et al. Nucleus-specific expression in the multinuclear mushroom-forming fungus Agaricus bisporus reveals different nuclear regulatory programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:4429–34.

Krizsán K, et al. Transcriptomic atlas of mushroom development reveals conserved genes behind complex multicellularity in fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116:7409–18.

Varga T, et al. Megaphylogeny resolves global patterns of mushroom evolution. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3:668–78.

Tsing AL. The mushroom at the end of the world: on the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. The mushroom at the end of the world. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 2015.

Kauffman, J. There ’s a new source for meat substitutes : fungi. WSJ. 2019. https://www.wsj.com/articles/theres-a-new-source-for-meat-substitutes-fungi-11570647109. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Li X, et al. Transcriptional profiling of Auricularia cornea in selenium accumulation. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5641.

Mir-Tutusaus JA, et al. Long-term continuous treatment of non-sterile real hospital wastewater by Trametes versicolor. J Biol Eng. 2019;13:47.

Xia M-C, et al. Isolation and identification of Penicillium chrysogenum strain Y5 and its copper extraction characterization from waste printed circuit boards. J Biosci Bioeng. 2018;126:78–877.

Ecovative Design LLC. We grow materials. 2018. https://ecovativedesign.com/. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

MycoWorks. We turn mycelium and agricultural byproducts into leather. https://www.mycoworks.com. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Jones M, et al. Thermal degradation and fire properties of fungal mycelium and mycelium—biomass composite materials. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–10.

Mazur, R. Mechanical Properties of Sheets Comprised of Mycelium : A Paper Engineering Perspective. Thesis (2015).

Hao J, et al. Bio-templated fabrication of three-dimensional network activated carbons derived from mycelium pellets for supercapacitor applications. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–9.

Campbell B, Ionescu R, Favors Z, Ozkan CS, Ozkan M. Bio-derived, binderless, hierarchically porous carbon anodes for li-ion batteries. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14575.

Stamets PE, et al. Extracts of polypore mushroom mycelia reduce viruses in honey bees. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–6.

Molnár Z, et al. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles by thermophilic filamentous fungi. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–12.

Jones M, Huynh T, Dekiwadia C, Daver F, John S. Mycelium composites: a review of engineering characteristics and growth kinetics. J Bionanoscience. 2017;11:241–57.

Jones M, Huynh T, John S. Inherent species characteristic influence and growth performance assessment for mycelium composite applications. Adv Mater Lett. 2018;9:71–80.

Islam MR, Tudryn G, Bucinell R, Schadler L, Picu RC. Morphology and mechanics of fungal mycelium. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–2.

Appels FVW, et al. Hydrophobin gene deletion and environmental growth conditions impact mechanical properties of mycelium by affecting the density of the material. Sci Rep. 2018;8:4703.

Appels FVW, et al. Fabrication factors influencing mechanical, moisture- and water-related properties of mycelium-based composites. Mater Des. 2019;161:64–71.

Haneef M, et al. Advanced materials from fungal mycelium: fabrication and tuning of physical properties. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41292.

Sun W, Tajvidi M, Hunt CG, McIntyre G, Gardner DJ. Fully bio-based hybrid composites made of wood, fungal mycelium and cellulose nanofibrils. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3766.

Chang J, et al. Modified recipe to inhibit fruiting body formation for living fungal biomaterial manufacture. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:1–12.

Cerimi K, Akkaya KC, Pohl C, Schmidt B, Neubauer P. Fungi as source for new bio-based materials: a patent review. Fungal Biol Biotechnol. 2019;6:17.

Goffeau A, et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science. 1996;274:546–67.

Staben C, et al. The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Nature. 2003;422:859–68.

Pel HJ, et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the versatile cell factory Aspergillus niger CBS 513.88. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:221–31.

Chen S, et al. Genome sequence of the model medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum. Nat Commun. 2012;3:913–9.

Binder M, et al. Phylogenetic and phylogenomic overview of the Polyporales. Mycologia. 2013;105:1350–73.

Stajich JE, et al. Insights into evolution of multicellular fungi from the assembled chromosomes of the mushroom Coprinopsis cinerea (Coprinus cinereus). Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:11889–94.

Morin E, et al. Genome sequence of the button mushroom Agaricus bisporus reveals mechanisms governing adaptation to a humic-rich ecological niche. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:4146.

Ohm RA, et al. Genome sequence of the model mushroom Schizophyllum commune. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010;28(9):957.

Martinez D, et al. Genome sequence of the lignocellulose degrading fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain RP78. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:695–700.

Huang Y-H, et al. Generation and analysis of the expressed sequence tags from the mycelium of Ganoderma lucidum. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61127.

Yu GJ, et al. Deep insight into the Ganoderma lucidum by comprehensive analysis of its transcriptome. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:1–13.

Ma Z, et al. Reconstruction and analysis of a genome-scale metabolic model of Ganoderma lucidum for improved extracellular polysaccharide production. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1–12.

Elsacker E, Vandelook S, Brancart J, Peeters E, De Laet L. Mechanical, physical and chemical characterisation of mycelium-based composites with different types of lignocellulosic substrates. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0213954.

Surowiecki, J. Turn of the century. WIRED. (2002) https://www.wired.com/2002/01/standards-2/. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Duncan, T. Before the Melting Pot : Pre- Columbian Weights and Measures. NIST.gov (2019). https://www.nist.gov/blogs/taking-measure/melting-pot-pre-columbian-weights-and-measures. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Vincent, N. The clauses of Magna Carta. British Library 2015. https://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/the-clauses-of-magna-carta. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

U.S Constitution. 1787. https://guides.loc.gov/constitution. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Arkin AP, Endy D. A standard parts list for biological circuitry. 1999. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/29794. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Knight T. Idempotent vector design for standard assembly of biobricks. 2003. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/21168. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Endy D, Brent R. Modelling cellular behaviour. Nature. 2001;409:391–5.

Endy D. Foundations for engineering biology. Nature. 2005;438:449–53.

Canton B, Labno A, Endy D. Refinement and standardization of synthetic biological parts and devices. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:787–93.

Shetty RP, Endy D, Knight TF. Engineering BioBrick vectors from BioBrick parts. J Biol Eng. 2008;2:1–12.

Kelly JR, et al. Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard. J Biol Eng. 2009;3:1–13.

Galdzicki M, et al. The Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) provides a community standard for communicating designs in synthetic biology. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:545–50.

Brandl J, et al. A community-driven reconstruction of the Aspergillus niger metabolic network. Fungal Biol Biotechnol. 2018;5:1–12.

Idnurm A, Meyer V. The CRISPR revolution in fungal biology and biotechnology, and beyond. Fungal Biol Biotechnol. 2018;5:18–211.

Cairns TC, Zheng X, Zheng P, Sun J, Meyer V. Moulding the mould: understanding and reprogramming filamentous fungal growth and morphogenesis for next generation cell factories. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12:77.

Cairns TC, Nai C, Meyer V. How a fungus shapes biotechnology: 100 years of Aspergillus niger research. Fungal Biol Biotechnol. 2018;5(1):13.

Baker T III, et al. Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in four southern forested floodplain communities. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2001;65:1334–477.

Meier CL, Rapp J, Bowers RM, Silman M, Fierer N. Fungal growth on a common wood substrate across a tropical elevation gradient: temperature sensitivity, community composition, and potential for above-ground decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42:1083–90.

ASTM D1413-07e1, Standard test method for wood preservatives by laboratory soil-block cultures. ASTM Int. 2007.

Keuskamp JA, Dingemans BJJ, Lehtinen T, Sarneel JM, Hefting MM. Tea Bag Index: a novel approach to collect uniform decomposition data across ecosystems. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013;4:1070–5.

Macdonald E, et al. Using the Tea Bag Index to characterize decomposition rates in restored peatlands. 2018;2469:221–35.

2nd International Tea Bag Index Workshop. European Soil Data Centre (ESDAC). https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/event/2nd-international-tea-bag-index-workshop. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

teatime4science. Welcome to the Teabag Index website! 2016. https://www.teatime4science.org. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Klein J. A mycologist hopes to show how a simple, silly experiment can illuminate fungal biology. 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/29/science/marshmallow-peeps-fungus.html. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Wise SA, Watters Jr. RL. NIST RM 8492 Report of Investigation. 2011.

Templeton DW, Wolfrum EJ, Yen JH, Sharpless KE. Compositional analysis of biomass reference materials: results from an interlaboratory study. Bioenergy Res. 2016;9:303–14.

Pringles. 2019. https://www.potatopro.com/brands/pringles. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

Naidu, R. Kellogg, Mondelez stock up on Pringles, Milka for fear of Brexit. Reuters. 2019. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-kellogg/kellogg-mondelez-stock-up-on-pringles-milka-for-fear-of-brexit-idUSKCN1Q81XB. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

De Ligne L, et al. Analysis of spatio-temporal fungal growth dynamics under different environmental conditions. IMA Fungus. 2019;1:1–13.

Calles J, Justice I, Brinkley D, Garcia A, Endy D. Fail-safe genetic codes designed to intrinsically contain engineered organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:10439–51.

Haraway D. Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press; 2016.

Haraway D, Endy D, Lejeune L. Tools for multispecies futures. J Des Sci. 2019;1:1–22.

Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82.

Mckinney W. Data structures for statistical computing in python. In: Proc. 9th Python Sci. Conf. (SCIPY 2010). 2010.

Seabold S, Perktold J, Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with Python. In: 9th Python Sci. Conf. 2010. p. 57–61.

Pedrogosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12:2825–30.

Hunter JD. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng. 2007;9:99–104.