Employing the equity lens to understand multisectoral partnerships: lessons learned from a mixed-method study in Canada

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 21 Số 1
Suvadra Datta Gupta1, Vaidehi Pisolkar1, Jacob Albin Korem Alhassan1, Allap Judge1, Rachel Engler‐Stringer1, Lise Gauvin2, Nazeem Muhajarine1
1Saskatchewan Population Health Evaluation and Research Unit (SPHERU), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
2Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, & Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de L’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background Multisectoral approaches to health are collaborations between stakeholders across multiple sectors, usually formed to address issues that affect health but go beyond the purview of one particular sector. The significance of multisectoral partnerships to attain health equity has been widely acknowledged. However, the extent which equity can be attained depends upon the perceptions of various stakeholders. We examine how multisectoral partnerships promoting healthy eating and active living conceptualized and employed an equity lens in their work. Method This study is part of a larger pan-Canadian mixed-method research and knowledge sharing program entitled MUSE (Multisectoral Urban Systems for health and Equity in Canadian cities). Data collected from both quantitative and qualitative sources for two sites of the MUSE project-Saskatoon and Toronto were analyzed. In the qualitative part, 30 semi-structured key informant interviews were conducted with key stakeholders from six different multisectoral partnerships based in Saskatoon and Toronto. Data were analyzed in an inductive way. In the quantitative part, a survey with 37 representatives of stakeholder organizations was carried out. Simple descriptive statistics (means and percentages) were used to observe the distribution of data and to complement the qualitative analysis. Results Equity was not a central component in program design although participants addressing equity, did so by discussing accessibility. How much consideration was given to equity varied as a function of the type of partnership. Most participants emphasized geographical accessibility but a few mentioned financial accessibility. Collaborative leadership style facilitated a participatory decision-making process, and thereby upholding equity in the partnership decision-making process. Communication, networking, and negotiation skills were found to be core competencies of a leader that contributed in upholding equity in partnership dynamics. The study also showed some challenges to embed equity in partnership works, such as the lack of comprehensive understanding of population health and its equity tenet. Conclusions Findings indicate that multisectoral partnerships aimed at promoting healthy eating and physical activity experience several challenges to attain equity within the partnership as well as in the partnership-based works aimed at reducing health equity in populations. Factors identified can support decision makers commit to and work to attaining equity within their partnerships as well as in the partnership-based work in the community and beyond.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity in health. Int J Heal Serv. 1992;22(3):429–45.

Braveman P, Gruskin S. Defining equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(4):254-8.

Goldberg A. It Matters How We Define Health Care Equity. Washington DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2013.

Graham H. Social determinants and their unequal distribution: Clarifying policy understandings. Milbank Q. 2004;82(1):101–24.

Storm I, den Hertog F, van Oers H, Schuit AJ. How to improve collaboration between the public health sector and other policy sectors to reduce health inequalities? - A study in sixteen municipalities in the Netherlands. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:97. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27334297.

United Nations. A/CONF.151/26/Vol.I: Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Rep United Nations Conf Environ Dev. 1992;I(August):1. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf.

Willis CD, Greene JK, Abramowicz A, Riley BL. Strengthening the evidence and action on multi-sectoral partnerships in public health: An action research initiative. Heal Promot Chronic Dis Prev Canada. 2016;36(6):101–11.

Bishai DM, Cohen R, Alfonso YN, Adam T, Kuruvilla S, Schweitzer J. Factors Contributing to Maternal and Child Mortality Reductions in 146 Low- and Middle-Income Countries between 1990 and 2010. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):1–13.

World Health Organization. Multisectoral and intersectoral action for improved health and well-being for all: mapping of the WHO European Region. Governance for a sustainable future: improving health and well-being for all. Final Report. Copenhagen Ø: WHO Regional Office for Europe. 2018. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf_file/0005/371435/multisectoral-report-h1720-eng.pdf?ua=1.

World Health Organization. Health in All Policies as part of the primary health care agenda on multisectoral action. 2018. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272710.

World Health Organization. Promoting Health in All Policies and intersectoral action capacities. 2022.

World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. Vol. 2, J Policy Modeling. Geneva: WHO; 2018.

Walraven G. The 2018 Astana Declaration on Primary Health Care, is it useful? J Glob Health. 2019;9(1):10313.

World Health Organization. Declaration of Astana. Global Conference on Primary Health Care. Astana: WHO; 2018. WHO/HIS/SDS/2018.61.

Fawcett S, Schultz J, Watson-Thompson J, Fox M, Bremby R. Building Multisectoral Partnerships for Population Health and Health Equity. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7(6):A118.

Brassolotto J, Raphael D, Baldeo N. Epistemological barriers to addressing the social determinants of health among public health professionals in Ontario, Canada: A qualitative inquiry. Crit Public Health. 2014;24(3):321–36.

Mattessich P, Johnson K. The Wilder Collabolartion Factors Inventory, 3rd addition. The Wilder Foundation; 2018. Available from: https://www.wilder.org/wilder-research/research-library/collaboration-factors-inventory-3rd-edition.

Bilodeau A, Galarneau M, Fournier M, Potvin L, Sénécal G, Bernier J. Self-evaluation Tool for Action in Partnership. Health Nexus. 2017. Available from: https://en.healthnexus.ca/sites/en.healthnexus.ca/files/resources/selfevaluationtool.pdf.

Lambton Public Health. Building Organizational Capacity for Health Equity Action: A Framework and Assessment Tool for Public Health. 2017. Available from: https://www.schulich.uwo.ca/publichealth/cases/WesternMPHCasebook20.

Reckers-Droog V, van Exel J, Brouwer W. Equity Weights for Priority Setting in Healthcare: Severity, Age, or Both? Value Heal. 2019;22(12):1441–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.07.012.

Braveman P, Arkin E, Orleans T, Proctor D, Acker J, Plough A. What is health equity? Behav Sci Policy. 2018;4(1):1–14.

Pauly MB, Shahram SZ, Dang PTH, Marcellus L, MacDonald M. Health Equity Talk: Understandings of Health Equity among Health Leaders. AIMS Public Heal. 2017;4(5):490–512.

Kenrick DT, Griskevicius V, Neuberg SL, Schaller M. Renovating the Pyramid of Needs: Contemporary Extensions Built Upon Ancient Foundations. Perspect Psychol Sci a J Assoc Psychol Sci. 2010;5(3):292–314.

National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health. Summary - Learning to work differently: implementing Ontario’s Social Determinants of Health Public Health Nurse Initiative. 2015.

Koontz TM, Newig J. From Planning to Implementation: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches for Collaborative Watershed Management. Policy Stud J. 2014;42(3):416–42.

Alexander JA, Comfort ME, Weiner BJ, Bogue R. Leadership in collaborative community health partnerships. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh. 2001;12(2):159–75.

Zorbas C, Browne J, Chung A, Baker P, Palermo C, Reeve E, et al. National nutrition policy in high-income countries: is health equity on the agenda? Nutr Rev. 2021;79(10):1100–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaa120.

Henson RM, McGinty M, Juliano C, Purtle J. Big City Health Officials’ Conceptualizations of Health Equity. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019;25(4):332–41.

Gore D, Kothari A. Social determinants of health in Canada: Are healthy living initiatives there yet? A policy analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2012;11(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-11-41.

McGrail K, Morgan J, Siddiqi A. Looking back and moving forward: Addressing health inequities after COVID-19. Lancet Reg Heal. 2022;9:100232.

Ndumbe-Eyoh S, Moffatt H. Intersectoral action for health equity: a rapid systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1056. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1056.

Remiker M, Sabo S, Jiménez D, SamarronLongorio A, Chief C, Williamson H, et al. Using a Multisectoral Approach to Advance Health Equity in Rural Arizona: Community-Engaged Survey Development and Implementation Study. JMIR Form Res. 2021;5(5):e25577.

Centers for Disease Control. Developing partnerships and coalitions to advance health equity. 2019;14–7. Available from: cdc.gov/healthequityguide.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Tập 21 Số 1

Thông tin tác giả