Empfehlungen zum Telemonitoring bei Patienten mit implantierten Herzschrittmachern, Defibrillatoren und kardialen Resynchronisationssystemen

A. Müller1, Karin Rybak2, Thomas Klingenheben3, Burghard Schumacher4, Carsten W. Israel5, Thomas M. Helms6, M. Oeff7, Christian Perings8, Stefan Sack9, Christopher Piorkowski10, Reinhold Preißler11, Christian Zugck12, Jörg O. Schwab13
1Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Krankenhaus Küchwald der Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Deutschland
2Kardiologische Praxis, Dessau-Roßlau, Deutschland
3Praxis für Kardiologie und Ambulante Herzkatheter-Kooperation, Bonn, Deutschland
4Medizinische Klinik II, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Deutschland
5Klinik für Innere Medizin – Kardiologie und Angiologie in Bethel, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland
6Deutsche Stiftung für chronisch Kranke, Fürth, Deutschland
7Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Kardiologie, Pulmologie und Angiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Brandenburg, Brandenburg, Deutschland
8Medizinische Klinik I, Klinikum Lünen, St. Marien-Hospital GmbH, Lünen, Deutschland
9Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Schwabingen, Städtisches Klinikum München GmbH, München, Deutschland
10Abteilung für Rhythmologie, Herzzentrum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
11Kanzlei Preissler, Ohlmann und Partner, Fürth, Deutschland
12Innere Medizin III (Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pulmologie), Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland
13Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Dubner S, Auricchio A, Steinberg JS et al (2012) ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Europace 14:278–293

Wilkoff BL, Auricchio A, Brugada J et al (2008) HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations. Europace 10:707–725

Heidbuchel H (2011) Telemonitoring of implantable cardiac devices: hurdles towards personalised medicine. Heart 97:931–939

Platt S, Furman S, Gross JN et al (1996) Transtelephone monitoring for pacemaker follow-up 1981–1994. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:2089–2098

Fetter JG, Stanton MS, Benditt DG et al (1995) Transtelephonic monitoring and transmission of stored arrhythmia detection and therapy data from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 8:1531–1539

Lazarus A (2007) Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: analysis of a worldwide database. Pace 30:S2–S12

Spencker S, Mueller D, Marek A et al (2007) Severe pacemaker lead perforation detected by an automatic homemonitoring system. Eur Heart J 28:1432

Neuzil P, Taborsky M, Holy F et al (2008) Early automatic remote detection of combined lead insulation defect and ICD damage. Europace 10:556–557

Guedon-Moreau L, Chevalier P, Marquie C et al (2010) Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads under advisory. Eur Heart J 31:2246–2252

Varma N, Michalski J, Epstein AE et al (2010) Automatic remote monitoring of cardioverter-defibrillator lead and generator performance: the Lumos-T safely reduseS routine office device follow-up (TRUST) trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 3:428–436

Halimi F, Clementy J, Attuel P et al (2008) Optimized post-operative surveillance of permanent pacemakers by home monitoring: the OEDIPE trial. Europace 10:1392–1399

Isreal CW, Bänsch D, Böcker D et al (2012) Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (Arbeitsgruppe Rhythmologie) zum Umgang mit Patienten mit ICD-Elektroden Riata und Riata ST der Firma St. Jude Medical.Herzschr Elektrophys 23:107–115

Varma N, Epstein AE, Irimpen A et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up -The Lumos-T safely reduces routine office device follow-up (TRUST) trial. Circulation 122:325–332

Ricci RP, Morichelli L, Santini M (2009) Remote control of implanted devices through Home Monitoring technology improves detection and clinical management of atrial fibrillation. Europace 11:54–61

Crossley GH, Boyle A, Vitense H et al (2011) The CONNECT clinical evaluation of remote notification to reduce time to clinical decision trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1181–1189

Ip J, Wald AL, Lip GYH et al (2009) Multicenter randomized study of anticoagulation guided by remote rhythm monitoring in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT-D devices: rationale, design, and clinical characteristics of the initially enrolled cohort: the IMPACT study. Am Heart J 158:364–370

Perings C, Bauer WR, Bondke HJ et al (2011) Remote monitoring of implantable-cardioverter defibrillators: results from the Reliability of IEGM Online Interpretation (RIONI) study. Europace 13:221–229

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00598026?term=EVATEL&rank=l

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00989417?term=ECOST&rank=l

Saxon LA, Hayes DL, Roosevelt Gilliam F et al (2010) Long-term outcome after ICD and CRT implantation and influence of remote device follow-up – the ALTITUDE Survival Study. Circulation 122:2359–2367

Landolina M, Perego GB, Lunati M et al (2012) Remote monitoring reduces healthcare use and improves qualitiy of care in heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators. Circulation 125:2985–2992

Mabo P, Victor F, Bazin P et al (2012) A randomized trial of long-term remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients (The COMPAS trial). Eur Heart J 33:1105–1111

Koplan BA, Kaplan AJ, Weiner S et al (2009) Heart failure decompensation and allcause mortality in relation to biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure: is a goal of 100 % biventricular pacing necessary? J Am Coll Cardiol 53:355–360

Saxon LA, Boehmer JP, Neumann S et al (2007) Remote active monitoring in patients with heart failure (RAPID-RF): design and rationale. J Cardiac Fail 13:241–246

Conraads VM, Tavazzi L, Santini M et al (2011) Sensitivity and positive predictive value of implantable intrathoracic impedance monitoring as a predictor of heart failure hospitalizations: the SENSE-HF-trial. Eur Heart J 32:2266–2273

Van Veldhuisen DJ, Braunschweig F, Conraads VM et al (2011) Intrathoracic impedance, audible patient alerts and outcome in patients with heart failure. Circulation 124:1697–1699

Fonarow GC, Abraham WT, Albert NM et al (2008) Factors identified as precipitating hospital admissions for heart failure and clinical outcomes: findings from OPTIMIZE-HF. Arch Intern Med 168:847–854

Adamson PB, Smith AL, Abraham WT (2004) Countinous automatic assessment in patients with symptomatic heart failure: prognostic value of heart rate variability measured by an implanted cardiac resynchronization device. Circulation 110:2389–2394

Boveda SME, Jacob S, Defaye P et al (2009) Incidence and prognostic significance of sustained ventricular tachycardias in heart failure patients implanted with biventricular pacemakers without a back-up defibrillator: results from the prospective, multicentre Mona Lisa cohort study. Eur Heart J 30:1237–1244

Sack S, Wende CM, Nägele H et al (2011) Potential value of automated daily screening of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator diagnostics for prediction of major cardiovascular events: results from Home-CARE (Home Monitoring in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) study. Eur J Heart Fail 13:1019–1027

Whellan DJ, Ousdigian KT, Al-Khabtib SM et al (2010) Combined heart failure device diagnostics identify patients at higher risk of subsequent heart failure hosptializations. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:1803–1810

Burri H, Quesada A, Ricci RP et al (2010) The monitoring resynchronization devices and cardiac patients (MORE-CARE) study: rationale and design. Am Heart J 160:42–48

Heidbuchel H, Lioen P, Foulon S et al (2008) Potential role of remote for scheduled and unscheduled evaluations of patients with an implantable defibrillator. Europace 10:351–357

Hindricks G, Bauer WR, Schwab JO et al (2008) Was bringt die Telekardiologie für Arzt und Patient? Dtsch Ärztebl 105:B141–B144

Hansen C, Rybak K (2008) Medtronic CareLink network registry, presentation of interim analysis. Meeting of German Society of Cardiology

Ricci R, dÓnofrio A, Padeletti L et al (2012) Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF. Europace 14:1661–1665

Varma N, Ricci RR (2013) Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit? Eur Heart J 34

Brachmann J, Böhm M, Rybak K et al (2011) Fluid status monitoring with a wireless network to reduce cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and mortality in heart failure: rationale and design of the OptiLink HF Study (Optimization of Heart Failure Management using OptiVol Fluid Status Monitoring and CareLink). Eur J Heart Fail 13:796–804