Empfehlung für Fragebögen zur Untersuchung der Fuß- und Sprunggelenkfunktion vom Research-Komitee der AGA

Borloz S, Crevoisier X, Deriaz O, Ballabeni P, Martin RL, Luthi F (2011) Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:40 Budiman-Mak E, Conrad K, Stuck R, Matters M (2006) Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised foot function index. Foot Ankle Int 27:519–527 Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE (1991) The foot function index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol 44:561–570 Celik D, Malkoc M, Martin R (2016) Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM). Rheumatol Int 36:1469–1476 Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B et al (2007) The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 45:S3–S11 Chen L, Lyman S, Do H, Karlsson J, Adam SP, Young E et al (2012) Validation of foot and ankle outcome score for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 33:1145–1155 Desai S, Peterson AC, Wing K, Younger A, Crump T, Liu G et al (2019) Minimally important difference in the foot and ankle outcome score among patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Int 40:694–701 Domsic RT, Saltzman CL (1998) Ankle osteoarthritis scale. Foot Ankle Int 19:466–471 Fleurence R, Whicher D, Dunham K, Gerson J, Newhouse R, Luce B (2015) The patient-centered outcomes research institute’s role in advancing methods for patient-centered outcomes research. Med Care 53:2–8 Gagnier JJ (2017) Patient reported outcomes in orthopaedics. J Orthop Res 35:2098–2108 Gagnier JJ, Morgenstern H (2017) Misconceptions, misuses, and misinterpretations of P values and significance testing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:1598–1603 Golightly YM, Devellis RF, Nelson AE, Hannan MT, Lohmander LS, Renner JB et al (2014) Psychometric properties of the foot and ankle outcome score in a community-based study of adults with and without osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 66:395–403 Gong XF, Sun N, Li H, Li Y, Lai LP, Li WJ et al (2022) Modified chevron osteotomy with distal soft tissue release for treating moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity: a minimal clinical important difference values study. Orthop Surg 14:1369–1377 Hamid KS, Nwachukwu BU, Ellis SJ (2014) Competing in value-based health care: keys to winning the foot race. Foot Ankle Int 35:519–528 Herbst E, Günther D, Ackermann J, Lattermann C, Mathis D, Schüttler KF et al (2022) Empfehlung für Fragebögen zur klinischen und subjektiven Untersuchung der Kniegelenksfunktion vom Research-Komitee der AGA. Arthroskopie 35:229–237 Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Lafave MR, Heard SM, Buchko GM, Mohtadi NG (2013) Initial validity and reliability of the Banff patella instability instrument. Am J Sports Med 41:1629–1635 Hogan MV, Mani SB, Chan JY, Do H, Deland JT, Ellis SJ (2016) Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for hallux rigidus. HSS J 12:44–50 Horn ME, Reinke EK, Couce LJ, Reeve BB, Ledbetter L, George SZ (2020) Reporting and utilization of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system(R) (PROMIS(R)) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res 15:553 Huh JW, Eun IS, Ko YC, Park MJ, Hwang KM, Park SH et al (2016) Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index. J Foot Ankle Surg 55:759–761 Hung M, Baumhauer JF, Licari FW, Voss MW, Bounsanga J, Saltzman CL (2019) PROMIS and FAAM minimal clinically important differences in foot and ankle orthopedics. Foot Ankle Int 40:65–73 Hunt KJ, Alexander I, Baumhauer J, Brodsky J, Chiodo C, Daniels T et al (2014) The orthopaedic foot and ankle outcomes research (OFAR) network: feasibility of a multicenter network for patient outcomes assessment in foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int 35:847–854 Hunt KJ, Hurwit D (2013) Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e118 Karatepe AG, Gunaydin R, Kaya T, Karlibas U, Ozbek G (2009) Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score. Rheumatol Int 30:169–173 Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, Ng L (1998) The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med 26:764–772 Kitaoka HB, Meeker JE, Phisitkul P, Adams SB Jr., Kaplan JR, Wagner E (2018) AOFAS position statement regarding patient-reported outcome measures. Foot Ankle Int 39:1389–1393 Kivlan BR, Martin RL, Wukich DK (2011) Responsiveness of the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM) in individuals with diabetes. Foot (Edinb) 21:84–87 Kuyvenhoven MM, Gorter KJ, Zuithoff P, Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Post MW (2002) The foot function index with verbal rating scales (FFI-5 pt): a clinimetric evaluation and comparison with the original FFI. J Rheumatol 29:1023–1028 Kvien TK, Heiberg T, Hagen KB (2007) Minimal clinically important improvement/difference (MCII/MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): what do these concepts mean? Ann Rheum Dis 66(3):iii40–41 Landorf KB, Radford JA, Hudson S (2010) Minimal important difference (MID) of two commonly used outcome measures for foot problems. J Foot Ankle Res 3:7 Lee KM, Chung CY, Kwon SS, Sung KH, Lee SY, Won SH et al (2013) Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS). Clin Rheumatol 32:1443–1450 Leopold SS, Porcher R (2017) Editorial: the minimum clinically important difference-the least we can do. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:929–932 Mani SB, Do H, Vulcano E, Hogan MV, Lyman S, Deland JT et al (2015) Evaluation of the foot and ankle outcome score in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle. Bone Joint J 97-B:662–667 Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM (2005) Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int 26:968–983 Martinelli N, Scotto GM, Sartorelli E, Bonifacini C, Bianchi A, Malerba F (2014) Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the foot function index in patients with foot and ankle diseases. Qual Life Res 23(1):277–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0435-4 Mazaheri M, Salavati M, Negahban H, Sohani SM, Taghizadeh F, Feizi A et al (2010) Reliability and validity of the Persian version of foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18:755–759 McDonald L (2001) Florence Nightingale and the early origins of evidence-based nursing. Evid Based Nurs 4:68–69 McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293–307 Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL et al (2010) The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 63:737–745 Moreira TS, Magalhaes Lde C, Silva RD, Martin RL, Resende MA (2016) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the foot and ankle ability measure questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil 38:2479–2490 Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Huber M, Rippstein PF (2008) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the foot function index for use in German-speaking patients with foot complaints. Foot Ankle Int 29:1222–1228 Nauck T, Lohrer H (2011) Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the foot and ankle ability measure for patients with chronic ankle instability. Br J Sports Med 45:785–790 Negahban H, Mazaheri M, Salavati M, Sohani SM, Askari M, Fanian H et al (2010) Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score: a validation study from Iran. Clin Rheumatol 29:479–486 Neuhauser D (2003) Florence Nightingale gets no respect: as a statistician that is. Qual Saf Health Care 12:317 Olerud C, Molander H (1984) A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103:190–194 Pinsker E, Daniels TR (2011) AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS clinical rating systems. Foot Ankle Int 32:841–842 Porter ME (2010) What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 363:2477–2481 Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J (2001) Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 22:788–794 Saag KG, Saltzman CL, Brown CK, Budiman-Mak E (1996) The foot function index for measuring rheumatoid arthritis pain: evaluating side-to-side reliability. Foot Ankle Int 17:506–510 Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Bravini E, Bargeri S, Moroso M, Plebani G et al (2014) Foot and ankle ability measure: cross-cultural translation and validation of the Italian version of the ADL module (FAAM-I/ADL). Med Lav 105:357–365 Sierevelt IN, Beimers L, van Bergen CJA, Haverkamp D, Terwee CB, Kerkhoffs G (2015) Validation of the Dutch language version of the foot and ankle outcome score. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2413–2419 Sierevelt IN, Zwiers R, Schats W, Haverkamp D, Terwee CB, Nolte PA et al (2018) Measurement properties of the most commonly used foot- and ankle-specific questionnaires: the FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2059–2073 Slover JD, Karia RJ, Hauer C, Gelber Z, Band PA, Graham J (2015) Feasibility of integrating standardized patient-reported outcomes in orthopedic care. Am J Manag Care 21:e494–500 Smith MV, Klein SE, Clohisy JC, Baca GR, Brophy RH, Wright RW (2012) Lower extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:468–477 Tapaninaho K, Uimonen MM, Saarinen AJ, Repo JP (2022) Minimal important change for foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS). Foot Ankle Surg 28:44–48 Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42 van Bergen CJ, Sierevelt IN, Hoogervorst P, Waizy H, van Dijk CN, Becher C (2014) Translation and validation of the German version of the foot and ankle outcome score. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:897–901 Venditto T, Tognolo L, Rizzo RS, Iannuccelli C, Di Sante L, Trevisan M et al (2015) 17-Italian foot function index with numerical rating scale: development, reliability, and validity of a modified version of the original foot function index. Foot (Edinb) 25:12–18 Weel H, Zwiers R, Azim D, Sierevelt IN, Haverkamp D, van Dijk CN et al (2016) Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the foot and ankle ability measure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1348–1354 Wu SH, Liang HW, Hou WH (2008) Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the foot function index. J Formos Med Assoc 107:111–118 Zwiers R, Weel H, Mallee WH, Kerkhoffs G, van Dijk CN, Ankle Platform Study Collaborative – Science of Variation Group (2018) Large variation in use of patient-reported outcome measures: a survey of 188 foot and ankle surgeons. Foot Ankle Surg 24:246–251