Emerging methods for conceptual modelling in neuroimaging

Akama H, Murphy B, Li N, Shimizu Y, Poesio M (2012) Decoding semantics across fMRI sessions with different stimulus modalities: a practical MVPA study. Frontiers Neuroinformatics 6:24 Akama H, Murphy B, Lei MM, Poesio M (2014) Cross-participant modelling based on joint or disjoint feature selection: an fMRI conceptual decoding study. In: Applied Informatics, vol 1, no 1. Springer, New York, p 1 Anderson AJ, Binder J, Fernandino L, Humphries C, Conant L, Aguilar M, Wang X, Doko D, Raizada RDS (2016) Predicting neural activity patterns associated with sentences using a neurobiologically motivated model of semantic representation. Cereb Cortex. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw240 (Advance Online Publication) Brennan J, Nir Y, Hasson U, Malach R, Heeger DJ, Pylkkänen L (2012) Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening. Brain Lang 120(2):163–173 Buchweitz A, Keller TA, Meyler A, Just MA (2012) Brain activation for language dual‐tasking: listening to two people speak at the same time and a change in network timing. Hum Brain Mapp 33:1868–1882 Carlson A, Betteridge J, Kisiel B, Settles B, Hruschka ER, Mitchell TM (2010) Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning. Artif Intell 2(4):3 Charest I, Kievit RA, Schmitz TW, Deca D, Kriegeskorte N (2014) Unique semantic space in the brain of each beholder predicts perceived similarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(40):14565–14570 Chomsky N (1981) Lectures on government and binding: the Pisa lectures. Walter de Gruyter, USA Dmochowski JP, Sajda P, Dias J, Parra LC (2012) Correlated components of ongoing EEG point to emotionally laden attention—a possible marker of engagement? Front Human Neurosci 6:112 Fairhall SL, Caramazza A (2013) Brain regions that represent amodal conceptual knowledge. J Neurosci 33(25):10552–10558 Fernandino L, Humphries CJ, Seidenberg MS, Gross WL, Conant LL, Binder JR (2015) Predicting brain activation patterns associated with individual lexical concepts based on five sensory-motor attributes. Neuropsychologia 76:17–26 Fernandino L, Binder JR, Desai RH, Pendl SL, Humphries CJ, Gross WL, Conant LL, Seidenberg MS (2016) Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: a framework for embodied semantics. Cereb Cortex 26(5):2018–2034 Frank MC, Everett DL, Fedorenko E, Gibson E (2008) Number as a cognitive technology: evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition 108(3):819–824 Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JP, Frith CD, Frackowiak RS (1994) Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 2(4):189–210 Fyshe A, Wehbe L, Talukdar P, Murphy B, Mitchell T (2015) A Compositional and Interpretable Semantic Space. In: Proceedings of NAACL, pp 32–41 Griffiths TL, Steyvers M, Tenenbaum JB (2007) Topics in semantic representation. Psychol Rev 114(2):211–244 Hanke M, Halchenko YO, Sederberg PB, Hanson SJ, Haxby JV, Pollmann S (2009) PyMVPA: a python toolbox for multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data. Neuroinformatics 7(1):37–53 Hasson U, Landesman O, Knappmeyer B, Vallines I, Rubin N, Heeger DJ (2008) Neurocinematics: the neuroscience of film. Projections 2(1):1–26 Haxby JV, Gobbini MI, Furey ML, Ishai A, Schouten JL, Pietrini P (2001) Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 293(5539):2425–2430 Haxby JV, Guntupalli JS, Connolly AC, Halchenko YO, Conroy BR, Gobbini MI, Hanke M, Ramadge PJ (2011) A common, high-dimensional model of the representational space in human ventral temporal cortex. Neuron 72(2):404–416 Kriegeskorte N, Goebel R, Bandettini P (2006) Information-based functional brain mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(10):3863–3868 Kriegeskorte N, Mur M, Bandettini P (2008a) Representational similarity analysis–connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Front Syst Neurosci 2:4 Kriegeskorte N, Mur M, Ruff DA, Kiani R, Bodurka J, Esteky H, Tanaka K, Bandettini PA (2008b) Matching categorical object representations in inferior temporal cortex of man and monkey. Neuron 60(6):1126–1141 Kriegeskorte N, Simmons WK, Bellgowan PS, Baker CI (2009) Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nat Neurosci 12(5):535–540 Landauer T, Dumais S (1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychol Rev 104(2):211–240 Lei M, Akama H, Murphy B (2014) Neural basis of language switching in the brain: fMRI evidence from Korean–Chinese early bilinguals. Brain Lang 138:12–18 Liuzzi AG, Bruffaerts R, Dupont P, Adamczuk K, Peeters R, De Deyne S, Storms G, Vandenberghe R (2015) Left perirhinal cortex codes for similarity in meaning between written words: comparison with auditory word input. Neuropsychologia 76:4–16 Lund K, Burgess C (1996) Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 28:203–208 Meteyard L, Cuadrado SR, Bahrami B, Vigliocco G (2012) Coming of age: a review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex 48(7):788–804 Mitchell TM, Shinkareva SV, Carlson A, Chang KM, Malave VL, Mason RA, Just MA (2008) Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science 320(5880):1191–1195 Murphy G (2004) The big book of concepts. MIT Press, USA, p 555 Murphy B, Poesio M, Bovolo F, Bruzzone L, Dalponte M, Lakany H (2011) EEG decoding of semantic category reveals distributed representations for single concepts. Brain Lang 117(1):12–22 Murphy B, Talukdar P, Mitchell T (2012a) Selecting corpus-semantic models for neurolinguistic decoding. In: Proceedings of First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM). Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 114–123 Murphy B, Talukdar PP, Mitchell TM (2012b) Learning Effective and Interpretable Semantic Models using Non-Negative Sparse Embedding. In: COLING. pp 1933–1950 Nevins A, Pesetsky D, Rodrigues C (2009) Pirahã exceptionality: a reassessment. Language 85(2):355–404 Newell A (1973) You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium Pliatsikas C, Luk G (2016) Executive control in bilinguals: a concise review on fMRI studies. Language and Cognition, Bilingualism, pp 1–7 Pulvermüller F (2005) Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:576–582 Raizada RD, Connolly AC (2012) What makes different people’s representations alike: neural similarity space solves the problem of across-subject fMRI decoding. J Cogn Neurosci 24(4):868–877 Regier T, Kay P, Khetarpal N (2007) Color naming reflects optimal partitions of color space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1436–1441 Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N et al (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15(1):273–289 Wehbe L, Murphy B, Talukdar P, Fyshe A, Ramdas A, Mitchell T (2014a) Simultaneously uncovering the patterns of brain regions involved in different story reading subprocesses. PLoS One 9(11):e112575 Wehbe L, Vaswani A, Knight K, Mitchell T (2014b) Aligning context-based statistical models of language with brain activity during reading. Proceedings of EMNLP Wilkins J (1668) An essay towards a real character, and a philosophical language. English linguistics, a collection of facsimile reprints, no. 119. Scholar Press, Germany, pp 1500–1800 Zinszer BD, Anderson AJ, Kang O, Wheatley T, Raizada RD (2016) Semantic structural alignment of neural representational spaces enables translation between English and Chinese words. J Cogn Neurosci. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01000 (Advance Online Publication)