Các phương pháp và công cụ mới nổi để đánh giá rủi ro môi trường, ra quyết định và chính sách cho vật liệu nano: tổng hợp từ Hội thảo Nghiên cứu Cấp cao NATO

AIST (2008) Research Center for Chemical Risk Management. A nanotechnology-claimed consumer products inventory in Japan. Available via DIALOG. http://staff.aist.go.jp/kishimoto-atsuo/nano/e_link_text.htm Balbus JM, Maynard AD, Colvin VL, Castranova V, Daston GP, Denison RA et al (2007) Meeting report: hazard assessment for nanoparticles—report from an interdisciplinary workshop. Environ Health Perspect 115:1654–1659 BCC (2008) BCC research, nanotechnology—a realistic market assessment (Report identifier Nano31C). http://www.bccresearch.com/report/NAN031C.html Benn TM, Westerhoff P (2008) Nanoparticle silver released into water from commercially available sock fabrics. Environ Sci Technol 42(11):4133–4139. doi:10.1021/es7032718 Borm PJA, Robbins D, Haubold S, Kuhlbusch T, Fissan H, Donaldson K et al (1996) The potential risks of nanomaterials: a review carried out for ECETOC. Part Fibre Toxicol 3:1–35 Casey A, Herzog E, Davoren M, Lyng FM, Byrne HJ, Chambers G (2007) Spectroscopic analysis confirms the interactions between single walled carbon nanotubes and various dyes commonly used to assess cytotoxicity. Carbon 45:1425–1432. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2007.03.033 Cedervall T, Lynch I, Foy M, Berggård T, Donnely SC, Cagney G et al (2007a) Detailed identification of plasma proteins adsorbed on copolymer nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:5754–5756. doi:10.1002/anie.200700465 Cedervall T, Lynch I, Lindman S, Nilsson H, Thulin E, Linse S et al (2007b) Understanding the nanoparticle protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:2050–2055. doi:10.1073/pnas.0608582104 Davies JC (2006) Managing the effects of nanotechnology. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Washington, DC 20004-3027. Available via DIALOG. http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/files/2708/30_pen2_mngeffects.pdf EC Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly-Identified Health Risks (EC SCENIHR) (2007) Opinion on the appropriateness of the risk assessment methodology in accordance with the technical guidance documents for new and existing substances for assessing the risks of nanomaterials. B-1049 Brussels, Belgium. Available via DIALOG. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_010.pdf European Commission (EC) (2005) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee: Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: an action plan for Europe 2005–2009. B-1050, Brussels. Available via DIALOG. http://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/pdf/nano_action_plan_en.pdf European Technology Platform (2006) Nanomedicine nanotechnology for health: strategic research agenda for nanomedicine. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. European Commission. http://cordis.europa.eu/nanotechnology/nanomedicine.htm Hansen SF, Maynard A, Baun A, Tickner JA (2008) Late lessons from early warnings for nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol 3:444–447. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.198 Holsapple MP, Farland WH, Landry TD, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Carter JM, Walker NJ et al (2005) Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, part II: toxicological and safety evaluation of nanomaterials, current challenges and data needs. Toxicol Sci 88(1):12–17. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfi293 International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) (2005) White paper on risk governance: towards an integrative approach. By Ortwin Renn with Annexes by Peter Graham. CH-1219 Geneva, Switzerland. Available via DIALOG. http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC_WP_No_1_Risk_Governance__reprinted_version_pdf International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) (2006) White paper on nanotechnology risk governance. By Ortwin Renn and Mike Roco with Annexes by Mike Roco and Emily Litten. CH-1219 Geneva, Switzerland. Available via DIALOG. http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC_white_paper_2_PDF_final_version-2.pdf. (See publication: Renn O, Roco MC (2006) Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. J Nanopart Res 8:153–191. doi:10.1007/s11051-006-9092-7 International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) (2007) Policy brief: nanotechnology risk governance: recommendations for a global, coordinated approach to the governance of potential risks. CH-1219 Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/PB_nanoFINAL2_2_.pdf Linkov I, Satterstrom K (2008) Nanomaterial risk assessment and risk management: review of regulatory frameworks. In: Linkov I, Ferguson E, Magar V (eds) Real time and deliberative decision making: application to risk assessment for non-chemical stressors. Springer, Amsterdam (in press) Linkov I, Steevens J (2009) Nanotechnology: risks and benefits. Springer, Amsterdam (in press) Linkov I, Satterstrom K, Corey L (2008) Nanotoxicology and nanomedicine: making hard decisions. Nanomedicine 4:167–171 Lynch I, Dawson KA, Linse S (2006) Detecting cryptic epitopes in proteins adsorbed onto nanoparticles. Science STKE 327:pe14 Lynch I, Cedervall T, Lundqvist M, Cabaleiro-Lago C, Linse S, Dawson KA (2007) The nanoparticle-protein complex as a biological entity: a complex fluids and surface science challenge for the 21st century. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 134–135:167–174. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2007.04.021 Michaelis K, Hoffmann MM, Dreis S, Herbert E, Alyautdin RN, Michaelis M et al (2006) Covalent linkage of apolipoprotein E to albumin nanoparticles strongly enhances drug transport into the brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 317:1246–1253. doi:10.1124/jpet.105.097139 NanoRoadMap EU 6th Framework (2005) http://www.nanoroadmap.it/ National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) (2008) Strategy for nanotechnology-related environmental, health and safety research. Available via DIALOG. http://www.nano.gov/NNI_EHS_Research_Strategy.pdf Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622–627. doi:10.1126/science.1114397 NNI (2004) Nanoscience research for energy needs. Report of the national nanotechnology initiative grand challenge workshop Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823–839 Petersen JL, Egan DM (2002) Small security: nanotechnology and future defense. Def Horiz 8:1–6 Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WA, Seaton A et al (2008) Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol 3(7):423–428. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.111 Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN) (2008) A Nanotechnology Consumer Products Inventory. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Available via DIALOG. http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/. Accessed March 2008 Québec Commission de l’éthique de la science et de la technologie (QC) (2006) Position statement: ethics and nanotechnology: a basis for action. Québec G1V 4Z2. Available via DIALOG. http://www.ethique.gouv.qc.ca/IMG/pdf/Avis-anglaisfinal-2.pdf Responsible NanoCode (RNC) (2006) Workshop report: how can business respond to the technical, social and commercial uncertainties of nanotechnology? Available via DIALOG. http://www.responsiblenanocode.org/documents/Workshop-Report_07112006.pdf Ryman-Rasmussen JP, Riviere JE, Monteiro-Riviere NA (2007) Variables influencing interactions of untargeted quantum dot nanoparticles with skin cells and identification of biochemical modulators. Nano Lett 7:1344–1348. doi:10.1021/nl070375j Stone V, Johnston H, Clift MJ (2007) Air pollution, ultrafine and nanoparticle toxicology: cellular and molecular interactions. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 6(4):331–340. doi:10.1109/TNB.2007.909005 Theron J, Walker JA, Cloete TE (2008) Nanotechnology and water treatment: applications and emerging opportunities. Crit Rev Microbiol 34:43–69. doi:10.1080/10408410701710442 The Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering UK (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. Available online at http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalreport.htm. Accessed 27 July 2008 UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (UK DEFRA) (2006) UK voluntary reporting scheme for engineered nanoscale materials. London SW1P 3JR. Available at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/nanotech/policy/pdf/vrs-nanoscale.pdf US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2007) Nanotechnology white paper. Prepared for the US EPA by members of the nanotechnology workgroup, a group of EPA’s Science Policy Council US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) (2007) Nanotechnology: a report of the U.S. food and drug administration nanotechnology task force. July 25, 2007. Available via DIALOG http://www.fda.gov/nanotechnology/taskforce/report2007.html Wiesner MR, Lowry GV, Alvarez P, Dionysiou D, Biswas P (2006) Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 40(14):4336–4345 Wörle-Knirsch JM, Pulskamp K, Krug HF (2006) Oops they did it again! carbon nanotubes hoax scientists in viability assays. Nano Lett 6:1261–1268. doi:10.1021/nl060177c