Emergency politics, mass sentiment and the EU during Covid
Tóm tắt
During crises, do emergency politics impair the EU polity by alienating Europeans? Recent literature suggests that executive decisions in hard times can spur negative European sentiment, increase polarisation in the public and thus create more problems than solutions. The Covid-19 pandemic offers an ideal opportunity to study this important issue. However, studying mass sentiment towards the EU is mostly constrained by imperfect survey data. We tackle this challenge with an empirical strategy that combines two original data sources: first, we use policy process analysis to identify key EU decisions; second, we leverage Twitter data to measure sentiment. As a result, we can study whether key EU decisions impacted EU sentiment and whether this impact is conditional on the level of EU competence, prior politicisation and problem pressure. We find that EU decisions impact EU sentiment positively and do not polarise it (even among highly politicised decisions). Low prior politicisation and healthcare-related decisions increase the positive impact of EU actions. There is thus no punishment of the EU for acting outside its remit. Our findings have important implications for the politics of polity maintenance in the EU.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. The state of exception. Durham: Duke University Press.
Alexander Shaw, Kate, Joseph Ganderson and Waltraud Schelkle. this issue. The strength of a weak centre: Pandemic politics in the European Union and the United States. Comparative European Politics.
Barberá, Pablo, Andreu Casas, Jonathan Nagler, Patrick J. Egan, Richard Bonneau, John T. Jost, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2019. Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data. American Political Science Review 113(4): 883–901.
Barberá, Pablo and Gonzalo Rivero. 2014. Political discussions on Twitter during elections are dominated by those with extreme views. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog.
Baumgartner, Frank R, Bryan D Jones and Peter B Mortensen. 2018. Punctuated equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in public policymaking. Theories of the policy process, 55–101.
Bojar, Abel, Anna Kyriazi, Ioana-Elena Oana and Zbigniew Truchlewski. 2021. Policy process analysis. Working paper.
Bojar, Abel and Hanspeter Kriesi. 2021. The decision-making structure in the EU under crisis conditions: Covid and refugee crises compared. Working Paper.
Bonnevie, Erika, Allison Gallegos-Jeffrey, Jaclyn Goldbarg, Brian Byrd, and Joseph Smyser. 2021. Quantifying the rise of vaccine opposition on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Communication in Healthcare 14(1): 12–19.
Ceron, Andrea, Luigi Curini, Stefano M. Iacus, and Giuseppe Porro. 2014. Every tweet counts? How sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens political preferences with an application to Italy and France. New Media & Society 16(2): 340–358.
Chung, Jessica and Eni Mustafaraj. 2011. Can collective sentiment expressed on Twitter predict political elections? In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI’11 AAAI Press, 1770–1771.
De Boef, Suzanna, and Luke Keele. 2008. Taking time seriously. American journal of political science 52(1): 184–200.
Di Mauro, Danilo, and Vincenzo Memoli. 2021. The role of public opinion in EU integration: Assessing the relationship between elites and the public during the refugee crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies 59: 1303–1321.
DiGrazia, Joseph, Karissa McKelvey, Johan Bollen, and Fabio Rojas. 2013. More tweets, more votes: Social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. PLoS ONE 8(11): e79449.
Ferrera, Maurizio, Joan Miro, and Stefano Ronchi. 2021. Walking the road together? EU polity maintenance during the COVID-19 crisis. West European Politics 44(5–6): 1329–1352.
Follesdal, Andreas, and Simon Hix. 2006. Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533–562.
Ganderson, Joseph, Waltraud Schelkle and Zbigniew Truchlewski. this issue. Who’s Afraid of Emergency Politics? Public Opinion on European Crisis Management during Covid-19. Comparative European Politics.
Goldberg, Andreas C., Erika J. van Elsas, and Claes H. de Vreese. 2020. Mismatch? Comparing elite and citizen polarisation on EU issues across four countries. Journal of European Public Policy 27(2): 310–328.
Heupel, Monika, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, Christian Kreuder-Sonnen, Markus Patberg, Astrid Séville, Jens Steffek, and Jonathan White. 2021. Emergency politics after globalisation. International Studies Review 23: 1959–1987.
Honig, Bonnie. 2009. Democracy and the foreigner. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jones, Erik. 2009. Output legitimacy and the global financial crisis: Perceptions matter. Journal of Common Market Studies 47(5): 1085–1105.
Jones, Erik, R. Daniel Kelemen, and Sophie Meunier. 2016. Failing forward? The Euro crisis and the incomplete nature of European integration. Comparative Political Studies 49(7): 1010–1034.
Kalyvas, Andreas. 2008. Democracy and the politics of the extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44: 347–361.
Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian. 2019. Emergency powers of international organisations: Between normalisation and containment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kriesi, Hanspeter and Abel Bojar. this issue. The decision-making structure in the EU under crisis conditions: Covid and refugee crises compared. Comparative European Politics.
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Abel Bojar, Argyrios Altiparmakis and Ioana-Elena Oana. forthcoming. Coming to terms with the refugee crisis in the EU. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oana, I.-E.., Ronchi, S., and Truchlewski, Z. (2023) EU Resilience in times of COVID? Polity maintenance, public support, and solidarity. Comparative European Politics.
O’Connor, Brendan, Ramnath Balasubramanyan, Bryan R Routledge and Noah A Smith. 2010. From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In Fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
Okango, Elphas, and Henry Mwambi. 2022. Dictionary based global twitter sentiment analysis of Coronavirus (COVID-19) effects and response. Annals of Data Science 9: 175–186.
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organisation 42(3): 427–460.
Rauh, Christian. 2021. Supranational emergency politics? What executives’ public crisis communication may tell us. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1916058.
Rhinard, Mark. 2019. The crisisification of policymaking in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 57(3): 616–633.
Truchlewski, Zbigniew, Waltraud Schelkle, and Joseph Ganderson. 2021. Buying time for democracies? European Union emergency politics in the time of COVID-19. West European Politics 44(5–6): 1353–1375.
Tumasjan, Andranik, Timm Sprenger, Philipp Sandner and Isabell Welpe. 2010. Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Vol. 4.
van Klingeren, Marijn, Damian Trilling, and Judith Möller. 2021. Public opinion on Twitter? How vote choice and arguments on Twitter comply with patterns in survey data, evidence from the 2016 Ukraine referendum in the Netherlands. Acta Politica 56(3): 436–455.
Weaver, R. Kent. 1986. The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 6(4): 371–398.
White, Jonathan. 2020. Politics of last resort: Governing by emergency in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young, Lori, and Stuart Soroka. 2012. Affective news: The automated coding of sentiment in political texts. Political Communication 29(2): 205–231.