Embodying the garrison state? Everyday geographies of militarization in American society
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abrams, 1988, Notes on the difficulty of studying the state (1977), Journal of Historical Sociology, 1, 58, 10.1111/j.1467-6443.1988.tb00004.x
Agnew, 1987
Bacevich, 2005
2007
Bacevich, 2008
Baran, 1966
Bernazzoli, 2009, Power, place, and militarism: towards a comparative geographic analysis of militarization, Geography Compass, 3, 393, 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00194.x
Bernazzoli, 2009, From militarization to securitization: finding a concept that works, Political Geography, 28, 449, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.08.003
Boot, 2003, Neither new nor nefarious: the liberal empire strikes back, Current History, 102, 361, 10.1525/curh.2003.102.667.361
Buck-Morss, 2000
1991
Chouinard, 2004, Making feminist sense of the state and citizenship, 227
City of Hopkinsville. (n.d.). http://www.hoptown.org Accessed 01.31.09.
Cowen, 2006, Fighting for “freedom”: the end of conscription in the United States and the neoliberal project of citizenship, Citizenship Studies, 10, 167, 10.1080/13621020600633101
Cowen, D. (2009). Panel comments in geopolitics and insecurity I: generating insecurity. In Annual meeting of the association of American geographers, Las Vegas, NV, March 26, 2009.
2008
Cresswell, 1996
Dalby, 2008, Warrior geopolitics: gladiator, black hawk down and the kingdom of heaven, Political Geography, 27, 439, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.03.004
Dijkink, 1996
Dittmer, 2005, Captain American's empire: reflections on identity, popular culture, and post-9/11 geopolitics, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95, 626, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00478.x
Dodds, 2007, Steve Bell's eye: cartoons, geopolitics and the visualization of the ‘war on terror’, Security Dialogue, 38, 157, 10.1177/0967010607078536
Enloe, 1983
Enloe, 2004
Enloe, 2007
Fitch, 1985, The garrison state in America: a content analysis of trends in the expectation of violence, Journal of Peace Research, 22, 31, 10.1177/002234338502200103
Flint, 2008, Mobilizing civil society for the hegemonic State: the Korean war and the construction of soldiercitizens in the United States, 345
Flint, 2004, How the united states justified its war on terrorism: prime morality and the construction of a ‘Just war’, Third World Quarterly, 25, 1379, 10.1080/0143659042000308429
Gallup, 2008
Gregory, 2004, The angel of Iraq, Environment & Planning D: Society & Space, 22, 317, 10.1068/d2203ed1
Gregory, 2006, The black flag: Guantanamo Bay and the space of exception, Geografiska Annaler Series B: Human Geography, 88, 405, 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2006.00230.x
Gross, 1973, Friendly fascism: a model for America, 287
Gross, 1980
Hammersley, 1995
Hannah, 2006, Torture and the ticking bomb, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 622, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00709.x
Hansen, 2001, Introduction: states of imagination, 1
Hedges, 2002
Hersh, 2006, The Iran plans, New Yorker, 82, 30
Jessop, 2001, Bringing the state back in (yet again): reviews, revisions, rejections, and redirections, International Review of Sociology, 11, 149, 10.1080/713674035
Jessop, 2002
Johnson, 2004
Jude, 2007
Kagan, 2006
Kirby, 1993
Klein, 2007
Kuus, 2007, “Love, peace and NATO”: imperial subject-making in Central Europe, Antipode, 39, 269, 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00521.x
Kuus, 2007
Kuus, 2009, Cosmopolitan militarism? Spaces of NATO expansion, Environment & Planning A, 41, 545, 10.1068/a40263
Kuus, 2008, Theorizing the state geographically, 95
Lasswell, 1962, The garrison-state hypothesis today, 51
Lutz, 2001
Megoran, 2006, For ethnography in political geography: experiencing and re-imagining Ferghana Valley boundary closures, Political Geography, 25, 622, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.05.005
Malkin, 2004
Maxwell, 2005
Mitchell, 1991, The limits of the state: beyond statist approaches and their critics, American Political Science Review, 85, 77, 10.2307/1962879
Morrissey, 2008, The geoeconomic pivot of the Global War on Terror: US central command and the war in Iraq, 103
Mountz, 2003, Human smuggling, the transnational imaginary, and everyday geographies of the nation-State, Antipode, 35, 622, 10.1111/1467-8330.00342
Morales, 2008
Müller, 2008, Situating identities: enacting and studying Europe at a Russian Elite University, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 37, 3, 10.1177/0305829808093728
Nolte, 1966
Painter, 2005, State/society, 42
Painter, 2006, Prosaic geographies of stateness, Political Geography, 25, 752, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.07.004
1997
Priest, 2003
Saad, 2006
Sharp, 1998, Reel geographies of the new world order: patriotism, masculinity, and geopolitics in post-cold war American movies, 152
Sharp, 2000
Stern, 1995, Why do people sacrifice for their nations?, Political Psychology, 16, 217, 10.2307/3791830
Stump, 2005, Religion and the geographies of war, 149
Tamir, 1997, Pro patria mori! Death and the state, 113
Thrift, 2000, It's the little things, 380
United States Census Bureau. (n.d.). http://www.census.gov Accessed 01.31.09.
Vagts, 1959
Weiss, 1994
Winchester, 2003
Woodward, 2004
Woodward, 2005, From military geography to militarism's geographies: disciplinary engagements with the geographies of militarism and military activities, Progress in Human Geography, 29, 718, 10.1191/0309132505ph579oa
The importance of focusing upon the everyday has been stressed, in one way or another, by feminist geographers (Dowler & Sharp, 2001; Chouinard, 2004), political geographers (Megoran, 2006; Mountz, 2003), and cultural geographers (Winchester, Kong, & Dunn, 2003).
In invoking ‘ordinary people,’ we are following Megoran's (2006:625) usage, which is not meant to suggest a monolithic category, but instead to refer broadly to those not in the position of “actively producing public geopolitical knowledge”.
A keyword search was performed using “military,” which returned over fifty pages of results and all polls dealing with the U.S. military, as well as foreign militaries. Findings were largely consistent across time and demographic groups.
Any emphases indicated in quotes were apparent in the audio files of the interviews.
All participant names have been changed to pseudonyms.