Elucidating How Environment Affects Patterns of Network Change: A Case Study of the Evolution of an Industrial Network in the Flat Panel Display Sector

Akamatsu, K. (1962). A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries. The Developing Economies, 1, 3–25. Mar-Aug. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2004). Global equity capital markets for emerging growth firms: Patterns, drivers, and implications for the globalizing entrepreneur. (The Alliance on Globalizing): Cambridge University Press. Barabasi, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512. Barabási, A.-L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311, 590–614. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 78–108. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997). Technological diffusion, convergence, and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1), 1–26. Betz, F. (2003). Managing technological innovation—Competitive advantage from change (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. Brody, P. T. (1996). The birth and early childhood of active matrix: A personal memoir. Journal of the Society for Information Display Apr, 113–127. Bruno, A. V., & Tyebjee, T. T. (1982). The environment for entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 288–307). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation, cohesion versus structural equivalence. The American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1287–1335. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: an application of social network analysis. Research Policy, 35(4), 463–480. Castrogiovanni, G. J. (1991). Environmental munificence: a theoretical assessment. Academy of Management Review, 16, 542–565. Chang, P.-L., & Shih, H.-Y. (2005). Comparing patterns of intersectoral innovation diffusion in Taiwan and China: a network analysis. Technovation, 25(2), 155–169. Chu, W.-w. (2009). Can Taiwan’s second movers upgrade via branding? Research Policy, 38(6), 1054–1065. Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709. Degenne, A., & Forsé, M. (1999). Introducing social networks (A. Borges, Trans.). London: Sage. Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52–73. Dickson, P., & Weaver, K. M. (1997). Environmental determinants and individual level moderators of alliance use. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 404–425. Dorogovtsev, S. N., & Mendes, J. F. F. (2003). Evolution of networks: From biological nets to the internet and WW. New York: Oxford University Press. Florida, R., & Browdy, D. (1991). The invention that got away. Technology Review, 93, 42–55. SepOct. Furman, J. L., & Hayes, R. (2004). Catching up or standing still? National innovative productivity among ‘follower’ countries, 1978–1999. Research Policy, 33, 1329–1354. Glasmeier, A. (1991). The high-tech potential: Economic development in rural America. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research. Goyal, S., Leij, M. J. v. d., & Moraga-Gonzales, J. L. (2006). Economics: an emerging small world. Journal of Political Economy, 114(2), 403–412. Granovetter, M. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105–130). Beverly Hills: Sage. Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness (the sociology of economic life). Boulder: Westview Press. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the world economy. Cambridge: MIT Press. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293–317. Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? The American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439–1493. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 203–215. Hobday, M., Rush, H., & Bessant, J. (2004). Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership. Research Policy, 33(10), 1433–1457. Hu, M.-C., & Mathews, J. A. (2005). National innovative capacity in East Asia. Research Policy, 34(9), 1322–1349. Hu, M.-C., & Mathews, J. A. (2008). China’s national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 37(9), 1465–1479. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.003. Hu, M.-C., & Tseng, C.-Y. (2007). Technological interdependence and knowledge diffusion in the building of national innovative capacity: the role of Taiwan’s chemical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(3), 298–312. Huang, H.-C., Shih, H.-Y., & Wu, Y.-C. (2011). Contagion effects of national innovative capacity: comparing structural equivalence and cohesion models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 244–255. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.07.017. Irwin, M., & Huges, H. (1992). Centrality and the structure of urban interaction: measures, concepts and applications. Social Forces, 71(1), 17–52. Jackson, M. O., & Rogers, B. W. (2006). Meeting strangers and friends of friends: How random are socially generated networks? American Economic Review. Jang, S.-L., Lo, S., & Chang, W. (2009). How do latecomers catch up with forerunners? Analysis of patents and patent citations in the field of flat panel display technologies. Scientometrics, 79(3), 563–591. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2032-1. Kawamoto, H. (2002). The history of liquid-crystal displays. Proceedings of the IEEE, 90(4), 460–500. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2002.1002521. Kawamoto, H., Shieh, H.-P. D., & Jang, J. (2007). Scanning the issue: special issue on LCD TVs. Journal of Display Technology, 3(4), 339–341. Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion (pp. 752–782). XLII: Journal of Economic Literature. Kogut, B. (2000). The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 405–425. Koka, B. R., Madhavan, R., & Prescott, J. E. (2006). The evolution ofinterfirm networks: environmental effects on patterns of network change. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 721–737. Könnölä, T., Smith, J., & Eerola, A. (2009). Introduction: future-oriented technology analysis—impacts and implications for policy and decision making. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(9), 1135–1137. Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure form and action (pp. 216–239). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Madhavan, R., Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (1998). Networks in transition: how industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 439–459. Mathews, J. A. (2005). Strategy and the crystal cycle. California Management Review, 47(2), 6–31. Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: state, effect, and response. Academy of Management Review, 12, 133–143. Murtha, T. P., Lenway, S. A., & Hart, J. A. (2001). Managing new industry creation: Global knowledge formation and entrepreneurship in high technology. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Nohria, N. (1992). Introduction: Is the network perspective a useful way of studying organizations? (Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Osterloh, M., & Rota, S. (2007). Open source software development—just another case of collective invention? Research Policy, 36(2), 157–171. Park, N., & Mezias, J. M. (2005). Before and after the technology sector crash: stock market response to alliances of e-commerce firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11), 987–1007. Parkhe, A., Wasserman, S., & Ralston, D. A. (2006). Introduction to special topic forum new frontiers in network theory development. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 560–568. Powell, W., Koput, K., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 116–145. Scott, J. P. (1991). Networks of corporate power: a comparative assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 181–203. Spencer, J. (2003). Global gatekeeping, representation and network structure: a longitudinal analysis of regional and global knowledge-diffusion networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 428–442. Staw, B. M., & Szwajkowski, E. (1975). The scarcity-munificence component of organizational environments and the commission of illegal acts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 345–354. Stolpe, M. (2002). Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology. Research Policy, 31(7), 1181–1198. Stowsky, J. (2004). Secrets to shield or share? New dilemmas for military R&D policy in the digital age. Research Policy, 33(2), 257–269. Tichy, N. (1980). A social network perspective for organization development (systems theory for organization development). Chichester: Wiley. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science–technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30(1), 35–54. Turk, H. (1977). Organizations in modern life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: the small-world problem. The American Journal of Sociology, 111(2). Verspagen, B., & Duysters, G. M. (2004). The small worlds of strategic technology alliances. Technovation, 24(7). von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovations. New York: Oxford University Press. Wilhite, A. (2001). Bilateral trade and ‘small-world’ networks. Computational Economics, 18, 49–64. Zander, I. (1999). How do you mean ‘global’? An empirical investigation of innovation networks in the multinational corporation. Research Policy, 28(2–3), 195–213.