Electronic ordering and the management of treatment interdependencies: a qualitative study of paediatric chemotherapy
Tóm tắt
There are serious safety risks associated with chemotherapy, often associated with interdependencies in regimens administered over months or years. Various strategies are used to manage these risks. Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems are also implemented to improve medication safety. Little is known regarding the effect of CPOE on how clinicians manage chemotherapy interdependencies and their associated safety strategies. We conducted a multi-method qualitative study in a paediatric hospital. We analysed 827 oncology incidents reported following CPOE implementation and carried out semi-structured interviews with doctors (n = 10), nurses (n = 6), a pharmacist, and oncology CPOE team members (n = 2). Results were interpreted according to safety models (ultra-safe, high-reliability organisations [HROs], or ultra-adaptive). Incident reports highlighted two interrelated types of interdependencies: those within organisation of clinical activities and those inherent in chemotherapy regimens. Clinicians reported strategies to address chemotherapy risks and interdependencies. These included rigid rules and ‘no go’ contexts for treatment to proceed, typical of the ultra-safe model; use of time (e.g. planning only so far ahead) and sensitivity to operations, typical of HROs. We identified three different time horizons in CPOE use in relation to patients’ treatments: life-long, the whole regimen, and the ‘here and now’. CPOE supported ultra-safe strategies through automation and access to rules/standardisation, but also created difficulties and contributed to incidents. It supported the ‘here and now’ better than a life-long or whole regimen view of a patient treatment. Sensitivity to operations was essential to anticipate and resolve uncertainties, hazards, CPOE limitations, and mismatches between CPOE processes and workflow in practice. Within oncology, CPOE appears to move the ‘mix’ of risk strategies towards ultra-safe models of safety and protocol-mandated care. However, in order to operate ultra-safe strategies embedded in CPOE and stay on protocol it is essential for clinicians to be thoughtful and show sensitivity to operations in CPOE use. CPOE design can be advanced by better consideration of mechanisms to support interdependencies.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Weingart SN, Zhang L, Sweeney M, Hassett M. Chemotherapy medication errors. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(4):e191–e9.
Small MD, Barrett A, Price GM. The impact of computerized prescribing on error rate in a department of Oncology/hematology. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2008;14(4):181–7.
Vincent C, Amalberti R. Safer healthcare: strategies for the real world. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016.
Carrington C, Stone L, Koczwara B, Searle C, Siderov J, Stevenson B, et al. The Clinical Oncological Society of Australia (COSA) guidelines for the safe prescribing, dispensing and administration of cancer chemotherapy. Asia Pacific J Clin Oncol. 2010;6(3):220–37.
Fani Pakdel A, Mousavi M, Roohani M, Elyasi S, Kooshyar M. 113P Chemotherapy administration safety standards for preventing medication errors and adverse drug reactions in patients with breast cancers. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl_9).
Neuss MN, Gilmore TR, Belderson KM, Billett AL, Conti-Kalchik T, Harvey BE, et al. 2016 updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/Oncology Nursing Society chemotherapy administration safety standards, including standards for pediatric oncology. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12(12):1262–71.
Coccia PF, Pappo AS, Beaupin L, Borges VF, Borinstein SC, Chugh R, et al. Adolescent and young adult oncology, version 2.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2018;16(1):66–97.
Pfeiffer Y, Gut SS, Schwappach DL. Medication safety in oncology care: mapping checking procedures from prescription to Administration of Chemotherapy. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14(4):e201–e10.
Franklin BD, Panesar SS, Vincent C, Donaldson LJ. Identifying systems failures in the pathway to a catastrophic event: an analysis of national incident report data relating to vinca alkaloids. BMJ Q Safety. 2014;23(9):765–72.
Ferranti JM, Horvath MM, Jansen J, Schellenberger P, Brown T, DeRienzo CM, et al. Using a computerized provider order entry system to meet the unique prescribing needs of children: description of an advanced dosing model. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011;11(1):14.
Gandhi S, Tyono I, Pasetka M, Trudeau M. Evaluating an oncology systemic therapy computerized physician order entry system using international guidelines. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(2):e14–25.
Allen SW, Hayashi RJ, Jones SJ, Drozda MH, Brown RL, Lackey IT, et al. Development of electronic chemotherapy roadmaps for pediatric oncology patients. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2018;35(5):314–9.
Elsaid K, Truong T, Monckeberg M, McCarthy H, Butera J, Collins C. Impact of electronic chemotherapy order forms on prescribing errors at an urban medical center: results from an interrupted time-series analysis. Int J Q Health Care. 2013;25(6):656–63.
Hoffman JM, Baker DK, Howard SC, Laver JH, Shenep JL. Safe and Successful Implementation of CPOE for Chemotherapy at a Children's Cancer Center. J Nat Compr Canc Netw. 2011;9(Suppl 3):S-36–50.
Martin DB, Kaemingk D, Frieze D, Hendrie P, Payne TH. Safe implementation of computerized provider order entry for adult oncology. Appl Clin Inform. 2015;6(4):638–49.
Whalen K, Lynch E, Moawad I, John T, Lozowski D, Cummings BM. Transition to a new electronic health record and pediatric medication safety: lessons learned in pediatrics within a large academic health system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(7):848–54.
Rahimi R, Moghaddasi H, Rafsanjani KA, Bahoush G, Kazemi A. Effects of chemotherapy prescription clinical decision-support systems on the chemotherapy process: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2019;122:20–6.
Wagner S, Beckmann MW, Wullich B, Seggewies C, Ries M, Bürkle T, et al. Analysis and classification of oncology activities on the way to workflow based single source documentation in clinical information systems. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15(1):107.
Chung C, Patel S, Lee R, Fu L, Reilly S, Ho T, et al. Implementation of an integrated computerized prescriber order-entry system for chemotherapy in a multisite safety-net health system. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018;75(6):398–406.
Crespo A, Redwood E, Vu K, Kukreti V. Improving the safety and quality of systemic treatment regimens in computerized prescriber order entry systems. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14(6):e393–402.
Rahimi R, Kazemi A, Moghaddasi H, Rafsanjani KA, Bahoush G. Specifications of computerized provider order entry and clinical decision support systems for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review. Chemotherapy. 2018;63:162–71.
Weiss BD, Scott M, Demmel K, Kotagal UR, Perentesis JP, Walsh KE. Significant and sustained reduction in chemotherapy errors through improvement science. J Oncol Pract. 2017;13(4):e329–e36.
Call RJ, Burlison JD, Robertson JJ, Scott JR, Baker DK, Rossi MG, et al. Adverse drug event detection in pediatric oncology and hematology patients: using medication triggers to identify patient harm in a specialized pediatric patient population. J Pediatr. 2014;165(3):447–52.e4.
Baldwin A, Rodriguez ES. Improving patient safety with error identification in chemotherapy orders by verification nurses. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016;20(1):59–65.
Amalberti R. Navigating safety: necessary compromises and trade-offs - theory and practice: springer; 2013.
Amalberti R, Vincent C. Managing risk in hazardous conditions: improvisation is not enough. BMJ Q Safety. 2019; Published Online First: 09 July 2019:bmjqs-2019-009443.
Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D. Organizing for High Reliability: Processes of Collective Mindfulness. In: Sutton RS, Staw BM, editors. Research in Organizational Behavior. Volume 1. Stanford: Jai Press; 1999. p. 81–123.
Thompson JD. Organizations in action: social science bases of administrative theory: McGraw Hill; 1967.
Cerner Corporation: https://www.cerner.com/. Accessed 10 Aug 2020.
Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation:how many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res. 2017;27(4):591–608.
Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.
Waring JJ. Constructing and re-constructing narratives of patient safety. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(12):1722–31.
Iedema R, Flabouris A, Grant S, Jorm C. Narrativizing errors of care: critical incident reporting in clinical practice. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(1):134–44.
Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.
Salkind N. Triangulation. In: Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2012.
Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1609406917733847.
Lichtner V, Baysari M, Gates P, Dalla-Pozza L, Westbrook JI. Medication safety incidents in paediatric oncology after electronic medication management system implementation. Eur J Cancer Care. 2019;28(6):e13152.
Endsley MR. Situation awareness in aviation systems. Handbook of aviation human factors; 1999. p. 257–76.
Daniel R, Schuck NW, Niv Y. How to divide and conquer the world, one step at a time. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(10):2929–30.
Timmermans S, Berg M. Standardization in action: achieving local universality through medical protocols. Soc Stud Sci. 1997;27(2):273–305.
Reinhardt H, Otte P, Eggleton AG, Ruch M, Wohrl S, Ajayi S, et al. Avoiding chemotherapy prescribing errors: analysis and innovative strategies. Cancer. 2019;125(9):1547–57.
Mol A. The body multiple: ontology in medical practice: Duke University press; 2002.
Westbrook JI, Ling L, Elin C, Lehnbom M, Baysari T, Braithwaite J, et al. What are incident reports telling us? A comparative study at two Australian hospitals of medication errors identified at audit, detected by staff and reported to an incident system. Int J Q Health Care. 2015;27(1):1–9.