Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association - Tập 22 Số 6 - Trang 1179-1182 - 2015
Raj M. Ratwani1,2, Rollin J. Fairbanks1,3,2, A. Zachary Hettinger1,2, Natalie C. Benda3,2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
2National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA
3Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract The usability of electronic health records (EHRs) continues to be a point of dissatisfaction for providers, despite certification requirements from the Office of the National Coordinator that require EHR vendors to employ a user-centered design (UCD) process. To better understand factors that contribute to poor usability, a research team visited 11 different EHR vendors in order to analyze their UCD processes and discover the specific challenges that vendors faced as they sought to integrate UCD with their EHR development. Our analysis demonstrates a diverse range of vendors’ UCD practices that fall into 3 categories: well-developed UCD, basic UCD, and misconceptions of UCD. Specific challenges to practicing UCD include conducting contextually rich studies of clinical workflow, recruiting participants for usability studies, and having support from leadership within the vendor organization. The results of the study provide novel insights for how to improve usability practices of EHR vendors.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Likourezos, 2004, Physician and nurse satisfaction with an electronic medical record system, J Emerg Med., 27, 419, 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.03.019

McGinn, 2011, Comparison of user groups’ perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review, BMC Med., 9, 46, 10.1186/1741-7015-9-46

Friedberg, 2013, Rand Corporation, Factors Affecting Physician Professional Satisfaction and their Implications for Patient Care, Health Systems, and Health Policy, 10.7249/RB9740

Survey of clinicians: user satisfaction with electronic health records has decreased since, 2010, American College of Physicians Website

Middleton, 2013, Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA, J Am Med Inform Assoc., 20, e2, 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001458

Kanry, 2011, Meaningful usability: health care information technology for the rest of us, Medical Informatics: An Executive Primer, 2nd ed, 1

Karsh, 2010, Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities, J Am Med Inform Assoc., 17, 617, 10.1136/jamia.2010.005637

Kellermann, 2013, What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology, Health Aff., 32, 63, 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0693

Bowman, 2013, Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: quality and safety implications, Perspect Health Inf Manag., 10, 1c

Sittig, 2011, Defining health information technology-related errors, Arch Intern Med., 171, 1281, 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.327

Sparnon, 2012, The role of the electronic health record in patient safety events, Pennsylvania Patient Saf Advis., 9, 113

Flanagan, 2013, Paper- and computer-based workarounds to electronic health record use at three benchmark institutions, J Am Med Inform Assoc., 20, e59, 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000982

Zheng, 2009, An interface-driven analysis of user interactions with an electronic health records system, J Am Med Inform Assoc., 16, 228, 10.1197/jamia.M2852

Zhang, 2011, TURF: toward a unified framework of EHR usability, J Biomed Inform., 44, 1056, 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.005

Allen, 1996, Information Tasks: Toward a User-Centered Approach to Information Systems, 1st ed, 10.1108/S1876-0562(1996)96

Svetlana, National Institute of Standards and Technology