Einsatz von patientenspezifischen Implantaten – eine Übersicht und aktuelle Entwicklungen

Yu J, Zhang J, Chen S, Han Q, Yan H (2021) Repair of unilateral combined orbital floor and medial wall fracture using two titanium mesh plates: a modified technique. Ann Transl Med 9(6):463–463. https://doi.org/10.21037/ATM-21-598

Timoshchuk MA, Murnan EJ, Chapple AG, Christensen BJ (2022) Do patient-specific implants decrease complications and increase orbital volume reconstruction accuracy in primary orbital fracture reconstruction? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 80(4):669–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOMS.2021.12.006

Sigron GR, Rüedi N, Chammartin F et al (2020) Three-dimensional analysis of isolated orbital floor fractures pre- and post-reconstruction with standard titanium meshes and “hybrid” patient-specific implants. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM9051579

Dinu C, Tamas T, Agrigoroaei G et al (2022) Prospective evaluation of Intraorbital soft tissue atrophy after posttraumatic bone reconstruction: a risk factor for Enophthalmos. J Pers Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/JPM12081210

Kotecha S, Ferro A, Harrison P, Fan K (2022) Orbital reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of patient-specific implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01074-x

Raisian S, Fallahi HR, Khiabani KS, Heidarizadeh M, Azdoo S (2017) Customized titanium mesh based on the 3D printed model vs. manual Intraoperative bending of titanium mesh for reconstructing of orbital Bone fracture: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Recent Clin Trials. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574887112666170821165206

Essig H, Wagner MEH, Blumer M (2021) Secondary corrections of the orbit: solitary fractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 29(1):129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2020.11.007

Ebrahimi A, Kalantar Motamedi MH, Rasouli HR, Naghdi N (2019) Enophthalmos and orbital volume changes in zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: is there a correlation between them? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 77(1):134.e1–134.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOMS.2018.08.028

Singh DD, Schorn L, Strong EB et al (2021) Computer-assisted secondary orbital reconstruction. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 14(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520935004

Helmers R, Klop C, Schreurs R, de Lange J, Dubois L (2021) Minimally invasive treatment with a patient specific implant in reconstruction of isolated anterior wall fracture of the frontal sinus. J Craniofacial Surg 32(1):341–344. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007149

Aman HM, Alenezi A, Ducic Y, v. Reddy L (2020) Complications and secondary management and repair in head, neck and plastic surgery: secondary reconstruction of the Zygomaticomaxillary complex. Semin Plast Surg 34(4):254. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0040-1721761

Powcharoen W, Yang WF, Li YK, Zhu W, Su YX (2019) Computer-assisted versus conventional freehand mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(6):1417–1428. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006261

Kokosis G, Schmitz R, Powers DB, Erdmann D (2016) Mandibular reconstruction using the free vascularized fibula graft: an overview of different modifications. Arch Plast Surg 43(1):3. https://doi.org/10.5999/APS.2016.43.1.3

Mahendru S, Jain R, Aggarwal A et al (2020) CAD-CAM vs conventional technique for mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap: a comparison of outcomes. Surg Oncol 34:284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2020.04.012

Goetze E, Moergel M, Gielisch M, Kämmerer PW (2019) Safety of resection margins in CAD/CAM-guided primarily reconstructed oral squamous cell carcinoma—a retrospective case series. Oral Maxillofac Surg 23(4):459–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10006-019-00797-8

Zweifel DF, Simon C, Hoarau R, Pasche P, Broome M (2015) Are virtual planning and guided surgery for head and neck reconstruction economically viable? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73(1):170–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOMS.2014.07.038

Rodríguez-arias JP, Tapia B, Pampín MM et al (2022) Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of fibula free flaps: a retrospective comparison of CAD/CAM versus conventional technique. J Pers Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/JPM12060930

Adolphs N, Haberl EJ, Liu W, Keeve E, Menneking H, Hoffmeister B (2014) Virtual planning for craniomaxillofacial surgery—7 Years of experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCMS.2013.10.008

Laure B, Louisy A, Joly A, Travers N, Listrat A, Pare A (2019) Virtual 3D planning of osteotomies for craniosynostoses and complex craniofacial malformations. Neurochirurgie 65(5):269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUCHI.2019.09.012

Fisher M, Miguel Medina I, Bojovic B, Ahn E, Dorafshar AH (2016) Indications for computer-aided design and manufacturing in congenital craniofacial reconstruction. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 9(3):235. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0036-1584391

Hsu SSP, Gateno J, Bell RB et al (2013) Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71(1):128. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOMS.2012.03.027

Li B, Wei H, Jiang T et al (2021) Randomized clinical trial of the accuracy of patient-specific implants versus CAD/CAM splints in orthognathic surgery. plast Reconstr Surg 148(5):1101. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008427

Gander T, Bredell M, Eliades T, Rücker M, Essig H (2015) Splintless orthognathic surgery: a novel technique using patient-specific implants (PSI). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43(3):319–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCMS.2014.12.003

Henry CH, Wolford LM (1993) Treatment outcomes for temporomandibular joint reconstruction after Proplast-Teflon implant failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51(4):352–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80343-X

Verhelst PJ, Smolders A, Beznik T et al (2021) Layered deep learning for automatic mandibular segmentation in cone-beam computed tomography. J Dent 114:103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDENT.2021.103786

Shujaat S, Riaz M, Jacobs R (2022) Synergy between artificial intelligence and precision medicine for computer-assisted oral and maxillofacial surgical planning. Clin Oral Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00784-022-04706-4/TABLES/1

Martinez-Marquez D, Mirnajafizadeh A, Carty CP, Stewart RA (2018) Data availability statement Application of quality by design for 3D printed bone prostheses and scaffolds. PLOS ONE 13(4):e0195291 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195291

Ghayor C, Chen TH, Bhattacharya I, Özcan M, Weber FE (2020) Microporosities in 3D-printed tricalcium-phosphate-based bone substitutes enhance osteoconduction and affect osteoclastic resorption. Int J Mol Sci 21(23):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS21239270