Egalitarianism, utilitarianism, and the Nash bargaining solution

Anbarci N, Sun CJ (2011a) Weakest collective rationality and the Nash bargaining solution. Soc Choice Welf 37:425–429

Anbarci N, Sun CJ (2011b) Distributive justice and the Nash bargaining solution. Soc Choice Welf 37:453–470

Fleurbaey M, Salles M, Weymark JA (eds) (2008) Justice, political liberalism, and utilitarianism: themes from Harsanyi and Rawls. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Kalai E (1977) Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: interpersonal utility comparisons. Econometrica 45:1623–1630

Kalai E, Smorodinsky M (1975) Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43:513–518

Karagözoğlu E, Rachmilevitch S (2018) Implementing egalitarianism in a class of Nash demand games. Theory Decis 85:495–508

Lensberg T, Thomson W (1988) Characterizing the Nash bargaining solution without Pareto-optimality. Soc Choice Welf 5:247–259

Mariotti M (1999) Fair bargains: distributive justice and Nash bargaining theory. Rev Econ Stud 66:733–741

Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155–162

Rachmilevitch S (2015) The Nash solution is more utilitarian than egalitarian. Theory Decis 79:463–478

Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Roth AE (1979) Axiomatic models of bargaining. Springer, Berlin

Sen A (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco

Shapley LS (1969) Utility comparison and the theory of games. In: La Décision: Agrégation et Dynamique des Ordres de Préf’erence, Editions du CNRS, Paris, pp 251–263

Suppes P (1966) Some formal models of grading principles. Synthese 6:284–306

Yaari ME (1981) Rawls, Edgeworth, Shapley, Nash: theories of distributive justice re-examined. J Econ Theory 24:1–39