Efficiency of linear selection index in predicting rice hybrid performance

Molecular Breeding - Tập 39 - Trang 1-13 - 2019
Xin Wang1,2,3, Yang Xu1, Pengchen Li1, Mingyang Liu2, Chenwu Xu1, Zhongli Hu3
1Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics of the Ministry of Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
2College of Information Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
3State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Tóm tắt

Selection index (SI) theory has been applied to predict the net genetic merit, select parents for the next cycle, and maximize the selection response in plant breeding. However, up to now, SI has not been applied to predict unobserved hybrid performance. In hybrid breeding, it is impossible to test every cross, and accurate prediction can help breeders greatly reduce the experimental cost. Traditional genomic selection (GS) targets single-trait prediction, and useful information about other related traits is ignored. With the data set of 575 rice hybrids subjected to the North Carolina mating design II, this information was utilized to develop a linear SI-based GS method to predict rice hybrid for a more accurate and comprehensive selection. Cross-validation results showed that genetic information of a low-heritability target trait such as grain yield could be greatly aggregated from auxiliary traits using SI. When SI was used for directly predicting the target trait, the SI-direct prediction underperformed the traditional genomic prediction in most cases. However, when the SI-direct prediction was combined with the traditional genomic prediction using a suitable weight ω inferred from the training data set, significantly higher accuracy could be obtained. This method was called as SI-assisted prediction. It provided a promising prediction means for breeding application, which used the phenotypes of auxiliary traits only in the training data set. Additionally, it was found that SI-assisted accuracy increased as the genetic correlation between auxiliary traits and the target trait increased, and high heritability of auxiliary traits could also improve the prediction performance.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Akcura M, Ceri S (2011) Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for selection of Turkish oat (Avena saliva L.) landraces under various environmental conditions. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 98(2):157–166 Bao Y, Kurle JE, Anderson G, Young ND (2015) Association mapping and genomic prediction for resistance to sudden death syndrome in early maturing soybean germplasm. Mol Breed 35(6):128 Bernardo R (1994) Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci 34(1):20–25 Beukert U, Li Z, Liu G, Zhao Y, Ramachandra N, Mirdita V, Pita F, Pillen K, Reif JC (2017) Genome-based identification of heterotic patterns in rice. Rice 10(1):22 Crossa J, Perez-Rodriguez P, Cuevas J, Montesinos-Lopez O, Jarquin D, de los Campos G, Burgueno J, Gonzalez-Camacho JM, Perez-Elizalde S, Beyene Y, Dreisigacker S, Singh R, Zhang XC, Gowda M, Roorkiwal M, Rutkoski J, Varshney RK (2017) Genomic selection in plant breeding: methods, models, and perspectives. Trends Plant Sci 22(11):961–975 Dekkers JCM (2007) Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. J Anim Breed Genet 124(6):331–341 Dekkers JCM (2015) Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. J Anim Breed Genet 124(6):331–341 Dhivyapriya D, Kalamani A, Raveendran M, Robin S (2016) Evaluation of drought tolerance in backcross inbred lines of rice genotypes based on selection indices. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 76(3):290–298 Goddard ME (1983) Selection indices for non-linear profit functions. Theor Appl Genet 64(4):339–344 Guo G, Zhao F, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Du L, Su G (2014) Comparison of single-trait and multiple-trait genomic prediction models. BMC Genet 15(1):30 Haile JK, N’Diaye A, Clarke F, Clarke J, Knox R, Rutkoski J, Bassi FM, Pozniak CJ (2018) Genomic selection for grain yield and quality traits in durum wheat. Mol Breed 38(6):75 Hayashi T, Iwata H (2013) A Bayesian method and its variational approximation for prediction of genomic breeding values in multiple traits. BMC Bioinf 14(1):34 Hazel L (1943) The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28(6):476–490 Hazel L, Lush JL (1942) The efficiency of three methods of selection. J Hered 33(11):393–399 Henderson C, Quaas R (1976) Multiple trait evaluation using relatives’ records. J Anim Sci 43(6):1188–1197 Jesus Ceron-Rojas J, Crossa J, Arief VN, Basford K, Rutkoski J, Jarquin D, Alvarado G, Beyene Y, Semagn K, DeLacy I (2015) A genomic selection index applied to simulated and real data. G3 5(10):2155–2164 Jesus Ceron-Rojas J, Crossa J, Toledo FH, Sahagun-Castellanos J (2016) A predetermined proportional gains eigen selection index method. Crop Sci 56(5):2436–2447 Jia Y, Jannink J-L (2012) Multiple-trait genomic selection methods increase genetic value prediction accuracy. Genetics 192(4):1513–1522 Kadam DC, Potts SM, Bohn MO, Lipka AE, Lorenz AJ (2016) Genomic prediction of single crosses in the early stages of a maize hybrid breeding pipeline. G3 6(11):3443–3453 Kempthorne O, Nordskog AW (1959) Restricted selection indices. Biometrics 15(1):10–19 Khan H, Gul R, Khan NU, Naz R, Shah S, Asim N, Latif A (2018) Role of selection indices in ascertaining high yielding drought stress tolerant chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.). J Anim Plant Sci 28(1):146–154 Leite WD, Uneda-Trevisoli SH, da Silva FM, da Silva AJ, Di Mauro AO (2018) Identification of superior genotypes and soybean traits by multivariate analysis and selection index. Rev Cienc Agron 49(3):491–500 Lopez-Cruz M, Crossa J, Bonnett D, Dreisigacker S, Poland J, Jannink J-L, Singh RP, Autrique E, de los Campos G (2015) Increased prediction accuracy in wheat breeding trials using a marker× environment interaction genomic selection model. G3 5(4):569–582 Lyra DH, de Freitas Mendonça L, Galli G, Alves FC, Granato ÍSC, Fritsche-Neto R (2017) Multi-trait genomic prediction for nitrogen response indices in tropical maize hybrids. Mol Breed 37(6):80 Popovac M, Petrovic M, Radojkovic D, Stanojevic D, Miletic A, Perisic P (2014) The assessment of genetic potential in performance tested gilts by means of selection indexes method. Genetika 46(1):95–104 Rapp M, Lein V, Lacoudre F, Lafferty J, Muller E, Vida G, Bozhanova V, Ibraliu A, Thorwarth P, Piepho HP, Leiser WL, Wurschum T, Longin CFH (2018) Simultaneous improvement of grain yield and protein content in durum wheat by different phenotypic indices and genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet 131(6):1315–1329 Rutkoski J, Benson J, Jia Y, Brown-Guedira G, Jannink J-L, Sorrells M (2012) Evaluation of genomic prediction methods for fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Plant Genome 5(2):51–61 Rutkoski J, Poland J, Mondal S, Autrique E, Perez LG, Crossa J, Reynolds M, Singh R (2016) Canopy temperature and vegetation indices from high-throughput phenotyping improve accuracy of pedigree and genomic selection for grain yield in wheat. G3 6(9):2799–2808 Sabouri H, Rabiei B, Fazlalipour M (2008) Use of selection indices based on multivariate analysis for improving grain yield in rice. Rice Sci 15(4):303–310 Schulthess AW, Wang Y, Miedaner T, Wilde P, Reif JC, Zhao Y (2016) Multiple-trait and selection indices-genomic predictions for grain yield and protein content in rye for feeding purposes. Theor Appl Genet 129(2):273–287 Scutari M, Howell P, Balding DJ, Mackay I (2014) Multiple quantitative trait analysis using Bayesian networks. Genetics 198(1):129–137 Singh SB, Phagna RK, Kumar B, Kumar S (2017) Determination of selection indices for waterlogging-stress tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) under field conditions. Appl Biol Res 19(2):172–179 Stanojević D, Ðedović R, Bogdanović V, Popovac M, Perišić P, Beskorovajni R, Lazarević M (2015) The potentials of using selection index in the assessment of breeding values of Holstein breeds in Serbia. Biotechnol Anim Husbandry 31(4):523–532 Togashi K, Lin CY, Yamazaki T (2011) The efficiency of genome-wide selection for genetic improvement of net merit. J Anim Sci 89(10):2972–2980 Ulfat A, Majid SA, Bibi A, Khanum K (2017) Evaluation of drought stress tolerance in spring wheat accession based on selection indices. Bangladesh J Bot 46(1):217–222 Wang X, Yang Z, Xu C (2015) A comparison of genomic selection methods for breeding value prediction. Sci Bull 60(10):925–935 Wang X, Li L, Yang Z, Zheng X, Yu S, Xu C, Hu Z (2017) Predicting rice hybrid performance using univariate and multivariate GBLUP models based on North Carolina mating design II. Heredity 118(3):302–310 Wang X, Xu Y, Hu Z, Xu C (2018) Genomic selection methods for crop improvement: current status and prospects. Crop J 6(4):330–340 Xu S, Zhu D, Zhang Q (2014) Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(34):12456–12461 Xu Y, Wang X, Ding X, Zheng X, Yang Z, Xu C, Hu Z (2018) Genomic selection of agronomic traits in hybrid rice using an NCII population. Rice 11(1):32 Zhang Z, Erbe M, He J, Ober U, Gao N, Zhang H, Simianer H, Li J (2015) Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance-covariance matrix. G3 5(4):615–627