Efficacy and predictability of Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection with different tarsectomy lengths for unilateral blepharoptosis treatment

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 21 - Trang 1-8 - 2021
So-Hung Yeh1, Shu-Lang Liao2,3, Yi-Hsuan Wei2
1College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
2Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei,Taiwan
3Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University, College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

Tóm tắt

To investigate the efficacy and predictability of Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection (MMCR) with different lengths of tarsectomy for the treatment of unilateral mild-to-moderate blepharoptosis. A retrospective study of patients who underwent MMCR with tarsectomy for unilateral mild-to-moderate blepharoptosis between January 2016 and December 2019 was performed. Individuals with adequate photographic documentation and good levator function were included. Data on age, gender, surgical designs, pre-operative and post-operative marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1) and tarsal platform show (TPS), and complications were retrieved. Sixty patients underwent 8-mm MMCR with 1- or 2-mm tarsectomy; 53 patients (88.3%) showed postoperative symmetry of MRD1 within 1 mm. The average postoperative improvement in MRD1 was 2.15 ± 0.8 mm. Thirty-two patients received 8-mm MMCR with 1-mm tarsectomy (group 1), and 28 patients underwent 8-mm MMCR with 2-mm tarsectomy (group 2). In group 1, postoperative symmetry rate was 90.6%, and the mean elevation of MRD1 was 1.66 ± 0.6 mm. In group 2, postoperative symmetry rate was 85.7%, and the mean elevation of MRD1 was 2.72 ± 0.6 mm. Both groups showed postoperative symmetry of TPS and significant improvement in eyelid position (p < 0.0001). No postoperative complication was noted, and no secondary surgery was needed. MMCR with tarsectomy was proven to be a safe, rapid, and effective method for patients with mild-to-moderate ptosis. Predictability and symmetry of the outcome were statistically confirmed. We further suggest a 2.1-mm expected MRD1 elevation as a cut point for choosing between 1- or 2-mm tarsectomy.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Putterman AM, Urist MJ. Muller muscle-conjunctiva resection. Technique for treatment of blepharoptosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93(8):619–23. Ediriwickrema LS, Geng J, Nair AA, Prendes M, Gerber AL, Yang PT, et al. Single suture Mueller muscle conjunctival resection (ssMMCR): a modified technique for ptosis repair. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;35(4):403–6. Gildener-Leapman JR, Sheps I, Stein R, Benyamini O, Milstein A, Hartstein ME. The Sutureless Mullerectomy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;35(3):290–3. Ullrich K, Malhotra R. How far we have come: a review of the evolution of posterior approach ptosis surgery. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;47(8):1082–7. Liao S-L, Chuang AY. Various modifications of Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection for ptosis repair. Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;21(2):31–6. Patel RM, Aakalu VK, Setabutr P, Putterman AM. Efficacy of Muller’s muscle and conjunctiva resection with or without tarsectomy for the treatment of severe involutional blepharoptosis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;33(4):273–8. Perry JD, Kadakia A, Foster JA. A new algorithm for ptosis repair using conjunctival Mullerectomy with or without tarsectomy. Ophthal Plast Recons. 2002;18(6):426–9. Dan J, Sinha KR, Rootman DB. Predictors of success following Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;34(5):483–6. Rootman DB, Karlin J, Moore G, Goldberg R. The role of tissue resection length in the determination of post-operative eyelid position for Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection surgery. Orbit. 2015;34(2):92–8. Rootman DB, Sinha KR, Goldberg RA. Change in eyelid position following Muller’s muscle conjunctival resection with a standard versus variable resection length. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;34(4):355–60. Zauberman NA, Koval T, Kinori M, Matani A, Rosner M, Ben-Simon GJ. Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection for upper eyelid ptosis: correlation between amount of resected tissue and outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(4):408–11. Ben Simon GJ, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection for correction of upper eyelid ptosis: relationship between phenylephrine testing and the amount of tissue resected with final eyelid position. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9(6):413–7. Carruth BP, Meyer DR. Simplified Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection internal ptosis repair. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29(1):11–4. Czyz CN, Rich NE, Foster JA, Kavanagh MC, Perry JD, Holck DE. Comparison of postoperative eyelid position using fibrin sealant versus suture for wound closure in Muller’s muscle-conjunctiva resection ptosis repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(2):423–30. Dresner SC. Further modifications of the Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection procedure for blepharoptosis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;7(2):114–22. Foster JA, Holck DE, Perry JD, Wulc AE, Burns JA, Cahill KV, et al. Fibrin sealant for Muller muscle-conjunctiva resection ptosis repair. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22(3):184–7. Guyuron B, Davies B. Experience with the modified Putterman procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82(5):775–80. Fasanella RM, Servat J. Levator resection for minimal ptosis: another simplified operation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1961;65:493–6. Gazit I, Gildener-Leapman J, Or L, Burkat CN, Pras E, Hartstein ME. Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection combined with tarsectomy for treatment of congenital ptosis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;35(6):619–22. Weinstein GS, Buerger GF Jr. Modification of the Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection operation for blepharoptosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;93(5):647–51. Mercandetti M, Putterman AM, Cohen ME, Mirante JP, Cohen AJ. Internal levator advancement by Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection: technique and review. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3(2):104–10.