Effects on sectors and regions of a carbon tax increase in Sweden: analysis with an SCGE model

Peter Almström1, Christer Anderstig2, Marcus Sundberg1
1Trafikverket, Stockholm, Sweden
2WSP Sverige AB, Stockholm, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hémous D (2012) The environment and directed technical change. Am Econ Rev 102(1):131–166

Adams P, Dixon J, Horridge M (2015) The Victoria university regional model (VURM): technical documentation”, version 1.0, Centre of Policy Studies (CoPS), Victoria University

Allan G, Lecca P, McGregor P, Swales K (2014) The economic and environmental impact of a carbon tax for Scotland: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Ecol Econ 100:40–50

Andersson J, Atkinson G (2020) The distributional effects of a carbon tax: The role of income inequality. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper nr 378

Anderstig C, Sundberg M (2013) Integrating SCGE and I-O in multi-regional modelling, Chapter 8. In: Pagliara F et al (eds) Employment location in cities and regions, advances in spatial science. Springer, Berlin

André FJ, Cardenete MA, Velázquez E (2005) Performing an environmental tax reform in a regional economy. A computable general equilibrium approach. Ann Reg Sci 39(2):375–392

Ardelean A (2006) How strong is the love of variety. Purdue University, CIBER Working Paper No 2006-006

Armington PS (1969) A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. Staff Papers 16(1):159–178

ASEK (2018) Analysmetod och samhällsekonomiska kalkylvärden för transportsektorn: ASEK 6.1”, Swedish Transport Administration, Borlänge (in Swedish)

Bohlin L (2010) Taxation of intermediate goods—a CGE analysis. Ph D thesis, Örebro University, Örebro

Dixon P, Rimmer M, Witter G, Honkatukia J, Tapia C, Sánchez Gassen N (2023) What impact do climate change policies have on Nordic economies, industries, and households? Nordregio Report 2023:10

Donnelly WA, Johnson K, Tsigas ME, Ingersoll D (2004) Revised Armington elasticities of substitution for the USITC model and the concordance for constructing a consistent set for the GTAP model. No 15861, Working Papers, United States International Trade Commission, Office of Economics. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uitcoe:15861

ESV (2018) Utfallet för statens budget—del av ESV:s underlag till årsredovisningen för staten 2017, Rapport 2018:32, ESV (The Swedish National Financial Management Authority) (in Swedish)

Feenstra RC, Luck P, Obstfeld M, Russ KN (2014) In search of the Armington elasticity. NBER Working Paper 20063, National Bureau of Economic Reasearch

Fried S (2018) Climate policy and innovation: a quantitative macroeconomic analysis. Am Econ J Macroecon 10(1):90–118

Fullerton D (2011) Six distributional effects of environmental policy. Risk Anal 31(6):923–929

Glomsrød S, Vennemo H, Johnsen T (1992) Stabilization of emissions of CO2: a computable general equilibrium assessment. Scand J Econ 94(1):53–69

Harrison GW, Kriström B (1999) General equilibrium effects of increasing carbon taxes in Sweden. In: Brännlund R, Gren I-M (eds) Green taxes: economic theory and empirical evidence from scandinavia. Edward Elgar, London

Heyndrickx C, Tourdyeva N, Alexeeva-Talebi V (2011) The SUSTRUS model: a CGE model on regional level for sustainability policies in Russia”, 51st Congress of the European Regional Science Association: new challenges for european regions and urban areas in a Globalised world. 30 August—3 September 2011, Barcelona, Spain

Hill M (2001) Essays on environmental policy analysis: computable general equilibrium approaches applied to Sweden. Ph D thesis, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm

Hill M, Kriström B (2002) Effects on the Swedish economy of unilateral climate policy. Draft 2002-01-11, Department of Forest Economics SLU, Umeå

Horridge M (2012) The TERM model and its database. In: Wittwer G (ed) Economic modeling of water: the Australian CGE experience. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 13–15

Imbs J, Méjean I (2010) Trade elasticities: a final report for the European Commission. Economic papers 432, December 2010. European Union

Ishikura T, Yokoyama F (2022) Regional economic effects of the ring road project in the greater Tokyo area: a spatial CGE approach. Pap Reg Sci 101(4):811–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12677

Kim E, Yi Y (2019) Impact analysis of high-speed rail investment on regional economic inequality: a hybrid approach using a transportation network-CGE model. JTEP 53(3):314–333

Kriström B, Boehringer C, Johansson P-O, Kiran C, Hu X (2020) Economy-wide analysis of Swedish nuclear power and electricity certificates. Energiforsk, Energiforskrapport. Report 2020:685

Krook Riekkola A, Berg C, Ahlgren EO, Söderholm P (2013) Challenges in soft-linking: the case of EMEC and TIMES-Sweden. Working Paper No. 131, November 2013, The National Institute of Economic Research (NIER), Stockholm

Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):483–499

Kumar S, Managi S, Fuji H (2015) Substitute or complement? Assessing renewable and nonrenewable energy in OECD countries. Appl Econ 47(14):1438–1459

Köppl A, Schratzenstaller M (2023) Carbon taxation: a review of the empirical literature. J Econ Surv 37:1353–1388. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12531

Landis F, Fredriksson G, Rausch S (2021) Between- and within-country distributional impacts from harmonizing carbon prices in the EU. Energy Econ 103:105585

Lanzi E, Ian Sue Wing IS (2010) Directed technical change in the energy sector: an empirical test of induced directed innovation. https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/mtec/cer-eth/resource-econ-dam/documents/research/sured/sured-2010/SURED-10_142_Lanzi_Wing.pdf

Lofgren H, Harris RL, Robinson S (2002) A standard computable general equilibrium model in GAMS. IFPRI, Microcomputers in Policy Research 5, ISBN 0-896-29720-9

NIER (2017) Miljö, ekonomi och politik 2017. The National Institute of Economic Research (NIER), Stockholm (in Swedish)

NIER (2023) Miljö, ekonomi och politik 2023. The National Institute of Economic Research (NIER), Stockholm

Otto V, von Below D (2023) The environmental medium-term economic (EMEC) model: version 4. NIER Working Paper No 156, May 2023, The National Institute of Economic Research (NIER), Stockholm

Östblom G, Berg C (2006) The EMEC model: version 2.0, Working Paper No. 96 November 2006, The National Institute of Economic Research (NIER), Stockholm

Papageorgiou C, Saam M, Schulte P (2013) Elasticity of substitution between clean and dirty energy inputs—a macroeconomic perspective. Discussion Paper No. 13–087, Centre for European Economic Research

Persyn D, Barbero J, Díaz-Lanchas J, Lecca P, Mandras G, Salotti S (2023) The ripple effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investment. J Reg Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12639

Pu Z, Hayashiyama Y (2012a) Effects of carbon dioxide control policy in china by multi-regional CGE model. Front Econ China 7(4):580–603

Pu Z, Hayashiyama Y (2012b) Energy resource tax effects on China’s regional economy by SCGE model. Environ Econ 3(1):41–52

Regeringens proposition 2016/17:146 (2017) Ett klimatpolitiskt ramverk för Sverige. Regeringen, Stockholm (in Swedish)

Sundberg M (2009) Essays on spatial economies and organization. Ph D thesis, TRITA-TEC_PHD 09-005, Kungl. Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm

Swärdh J-E, Algersoch SK Ek (2023) Fördelningseffekter av bilstyrmedel för att nå klimatmålet 2030—En analys av inkomst- och geografisk dimension. VTI Rapport 1192 (in Swedish)

Zhang ZX (1998) Macroeconomic effects of CO2 emission limits: a computable general equilibrium analysis for China. J Policy Model 20(2):213–250