Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) and chronic remote ischemic preconditioning (cRIPC) on levels of plasma cytokines, cell surface characteristics of monocytes and in-vitro angiogenesis: a pilot study
Tóm tắt
Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) protects the heart against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury and recent work also suggested chronic remote ischemic conditioning (cRIPC) for cardiovascular protection. Based on current knowledge that systemic immunomodulatory effects of RIPC and the anti-inflammatory capacity of monocytes might be involved in cardiovascular protection, the aim of our study was to evaluate whether RIPC/cRIPC blood plasma is able to induce in-vitro angiogenesis, identify responsible factors and evaluate the effects of RIPC/cRIPC on cell surface characteristics of circulating monocytes. Eleven healthy volunteers were subjected to RIPC/cRIPC using a blood pressure cuff inflated to > 200 mmHg for 3 × 5 min on the upper arm. Plasma and peripheral blood monocytes were isolated before RIPC (Control), after 1 × RIPC (RIPC) and at the end of 1 week of daily RIPC (cRIPC) treatment. Plasma concentrations of potentially pro-angiogenic humoral factors (CXCL5, Growth hormone, IGFBP3, IL-1α, IL-6, Angiopoietin 2, VEGF, PECAM-1, sTie-2, IL-8, MCSF) were measured using custom made multiplex ELISA systems. Tube formation assays for evaluation of in-vitro angiogenesis were performed with donor plasma, monocyte conditioned culture media as well as IL-1α, CXCL5 and Growth hormone. The presence of CD14, CD16, Tie-2 and CCR2 was analyzed on monocytes by flow cytometry. Employing in-vitro tube formation assays, several parameters of angiogenesis were significantly increased by cRIPC plasma (number of nodes, P < 0.05; number of master junctions, P < 0.05; number of segments, P < 0.05) but were not influenced by culture medium from RIPC/cRIPC treated monocytes. While RIPC/cRIPC treatment did not lead to significant changes of the median plasma concentrations of any of the selected potentially pro-angiogenic humoral factors, in-depth analysis of the individual subjects revealed differences in plasma levels of IL-1α, CXCL5 and Growth hormone after RIPC/cRIPC treatment in some of the volunteers. Nevertheless, the positive effects of RIPC/cRIPC plasma on in-vitro angiogenesis could not be mimicked by the addition of the respective humoral factors alone or in combination. While monocyte conditioned culture media did not affect in-vitro tube formation, flow cytometry analyses of circulating monocytes revealed a significant increase in the number of Tie-2 positive and a decrease of CCR2 positive monocytes after RIPC/cRIPC (Tie-2: cRIPC, P < 0.05; CCR2: RIPC P < 0.01). Cardiovascular protection may be mediated by RIPC and cRIPC via a regulation of plasma cytokines as well as changes in cell surface characteristics of monocytes (e.g. Tie-2). Our results suggest that a combination of humoral and cellular factors could be responsible for the RIPC/cRIPC mediated effects and that interindividual variations seem to play a considerable part in the RIPC/cRIPC associated mechanisms.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andreadou I, Cabrera-Fuentes HA, Devaux Y, Frangogiannis NG, Frantz S, Guzik T, Liehn EA, Gomes CPC, Schulz R, Hausenloy DJ (2019) Immune cells as targets for cardioprotection: new players and novel therapeutic opportunities. Cardiovasc Res 115:1117–1130. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvz050
Anttila V, Haapanen H, Yannopoulos F, Herajarvi J, Anttila T, Juvonen T (2016) Review of remote ischemic preconditioning: from laboratory studies to clinical trials. Scand Cardiovasc J 50:355–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2016.1233351
Berndt R, Hummitzsch L, Hess K, Albrecht M, Zitta K, Rusch R, Sarras B, Bayer A, Cremer J, Faendrich F, Gross J (2018) Allogeneic transplantation of programmable cells of monocytic origin (PCMO) improves angiogenesis and tissue recovery in critical limb ischemia (CLI): a translational approach. Stem Cell Res Ther 9:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0871-8
Carpentier G, Berndt S, Ferratge S, Rasband W, Cuendet M, Uzan G, Albanese P (2020) Angiogenesis Analyzer for ImageJ—a comparative morphometric analysis of “Endothelial Tube Formation Assay” and “Fibrin Bead Assay.” Sci Rep 10:11568. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67289-8
Chen Q, Huang M, Wu J, Jiang Q, Zheng X (2020) Exosomes isolated from the plasma of remote ischemic conditioning rats improved cardiac function and angiogenesis after myocardial infarction through targeting Hsp70. Aging (Albany NY) 12:3682–3693. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.102837
Chong J, Bulluck H, Fw Ho A, Boisvert WA, Hausenloy DJ (2019) Chronic remote ischemic conditioning for cardiovascular protection. Cond Med 2:164–169
Corliss BA, Azimi MS, Munson JM, Peirce SM, Murfee WL (2016) Macrophages: an inflammatory link between angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Microcirculation 23:95–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12259
Dalton HJ, Armaiz-Pena GN, Gonzalez-Villasana V, Lopez-Berestein G, Bar-Eli M, Sood AK (2014) Monocyte subpopulations in angiogenesis. Cancer Res 74:1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2825
Davidson SM, Andreadou I, Barile L, Birnbaum Y, Cabrera-Fuentes HA, Cohen MV, Downey JM, Girao H, Pagliaro P, Penna C, Pernow J, Preissner KT, Ferdinandy P (2019) Circulating blood cells and extracellular vesicles in acute cardioprotection. Cardiovasc Res 115:1156–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvy314
Eitel I, Stiermaier T, Rommel KP, Fuernau G, Sandri M, Mangner N, Linke A, Erbs S, Lurz P, Boudriot E, Mende M, Desch S, Schuler G, Thiele H (2015) Cardioprotection by combined intrahospital remote ischaemic perconditioning and postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the randomized LIPSIA CONDITIONING trial. Eur Heart J 36:3049–3057. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv463
Franca CN, Izar MCO, Hortencio MNS, do Amaral JB, Ferreira CES, Tuleta ID, Fonseca FAH (2017) Monocyte subtypes and the CCR2 chemokine receptor in cardiovascular disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 131:1215–1224. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20170009
Gaspar A, Lourenco AP, Pereira MA, Azevedo P, Roncon-Albuquerque R Jr, Marques J, Leite-Moreira AF (2018) Randomized controlled trial of remote ischaemic conditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction as adjuvant to primary angioplasty (RIC-STEMI). Basic Res Cardiol 113:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-018-0672-3
Gedik N, Kottenberg E, Thielmann M, Frey UH, Jakob H, Peters J, Heusch G, Kleinbongard P (2017) Potential humoral mediators of remote ischemic preconditioning in patients undergoing surgical coronary revascularization. Sci Rep 7:12660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12833-2
Hausenloy DJ, Candilio L, Evans R, Ariti C, Jenkins DP, Kolvekar S, Knight R, Kunst G, Laing C, Nicholas J, Pepper J, Robertson S, Xenou M, Clayton T, Yellon DM, Investigators ET (2015) Remote ischemic preconditioning and outcomes of cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 373:1408–1417. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1413534
Hausenloy DJ, Kharbanda RK, Moller UK, Ramlall M, Aaroe J, Butler R, Bulluck H, Clayton T, Dana A, Dodd M, Engstrom T, Evans R, Lassen JF, Christensen EF, Garcia-Ruiz JM, Gorog DA, Hjort J, Houghton RF, Ibanez B, Knight R, Lippert FK, Lonborg JT, Maeng M, Milasinovic D, More R, Nicholas JM, Jensen LO, Perkins A, Radovanovic N, Rakhit RD, Ravkilde J, Ryding AD, Schmidt MR, Riddervold IS, Sorensen HT, Stankovic G, Varma M, Webb I, Terkelsen CJ, Greenwood JP, Yellon DM, Botker HE (2019) Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI): a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 394:1415–1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32039-2
Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM (2008) Remote ischaemic preconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application. Cardiovasc Res 79:377–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvn114
Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM (2010) The second window of preconditioning (SWOP) where are we now? Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 24:235–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-010-6237-9
Heusch G (2020) Myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury and cardioprotection in perspective. Nat Rev Cardiol 17:773–789. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-020-0403-y
Heusch G (2019) The spleen in myocardial infarction. Circ Res 124:26–28. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314331
Heusch G, Botker HE, Przyklenk K, Redington A, Yellon D (2015) Remote ischemic conditioning. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:177–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.031
Honda T, He Q, Wang F, Redington AN (2019) Acute and chronic remote ischemic conditioning attenuate septic cardiomyopathy, improve cardiac output, protect systemic organs, and improve mortality in a lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis model. Basic Res Cardiol 114:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-019-0724-3
Hummitzsch L, Albrecht M, Zitta K, Hess K, Parczany K, Rusch R, Cremer J, Steinfath M, Haneya A, Faendrich F, Berndt R (2020) Human monocytes subjected to ischaemia/reperfusion inhibit angiogenesis and wound healing in vitro. Cell Prolif 53:e12753. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12753
Hummitzsch L, Zitta K, Rusch R, Cremer J, Steinfath M, Gross J, Fandrich F, Berndt R, Albrecht M (2019) Characterization of the angiogenic potential of human regulatory macrophages (Mreg) after ischemia/reperfusion injury in vitro. Stem Cells Int 2019:3725863. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3725863
Kanashiro-Takeuchi RM, Tziomalos K, Takeuchi LM, Treuer AV, Lamirault G, Dulce R, Hurtado M, Song Y, Block NL, Rick F, Klukovits A, Hu Q, Varga JL, Schally AV, Hare JM (2010) Cardioprotective effects of growth hormone-releasing hormone agonist after myocardial infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:2604–2609. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914138107
Kleinbongard P, Botker HE, Ovize M, Hausenloy DJ, Heusch G (2020) Co-morbidities and co-medications as confounders of cardioprotection—does it matter in the clinical setting? Br J Pharmacol 177:5252–5269. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14839
Kleinbongard P, Neuhauser M, Thielmann M, Kottenberg E, Peters J, Jakob H, Heusch G (2016) Confounders of cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiology 133:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441216
Kleinbongard P, Skyschally A, Heusch G (2017) Cardioprotection by remote ischemic conditioning and its signal transduction. Pflugers Arch 469:159–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-016-1922-6
Kottenberg E, Thielmann M, Bergmann L, Heine T, Jakob H, Heusch G, Peters J (2012) Protection by remote ischemic preconditioning during coronary artery bypass graft surgery with isoflurane but not propofol—a clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 56:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02585.x
Lavergne M, Derkaoui M, Delmau C, Letourneur D, Uzan G, Le Visage C (2012) Porous polysaccharide-based scaffolds for human endothelial progenitor cells. Macromol Biosci 12:901–910. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201100431
Lieder HR, Kleinbongard P, Skyschally A, Hagelschuer H, Chilian WM, Heusch G (2018) Vago-splenic axis in signal transduction of remote ischemic preconditioning in pigs and rats. Circ Res 123:1152–1163. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313859
Loukogeorgakis SP, Panagiotidou AT, Broadhead MW, Donald A, Deanfield JE, MacAllister RJ (2005) Remote ischemic preconditioning provides early and late protection against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans: role of the autonomic nervous system. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:450–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.044
Malone K, Amu S, Moore AC, Waeber C (2019) Immunomodulatory therapeutic strategies in stroke. Front Pharmacol 10:630. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00630
McCafferty K, Forbes S, Thiemermann C, Yaqoob MM (2014) The challenge of translating ischemic conditioning from animal models to humans: the role of comorbidities. Dis Model Mech 7:1321–1333. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.016741
Meybohm P, Bein B, Brosteanu O, Cremer J, Gruenewald M, Stoppe C, Coburn M, Schaelte G, Boning A, Niemann B, Roesner J, Kletzin F, Strouhal U, Reyher C, Laufenberg-Feldmann R, Ferner M, Brandes IF, Bauer M, Stehr SN, Kortgen A, Wittmann M, Baumgarten G, Meyer-Treschan T, Kienbaum P, Heringlake M, Schon J, Sander M, Treskatsch S, Smul T, Wolwender E, Schilling T, Fuernau G, Hasenclever D, Zacharowski K (2015) A multicenter trial of remote ischemic preconditioning for heart surgery. N Engl J Med 373:1397–1407. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1413579
Michelsen MM, Stottrup NB, Schmidt MR, Lofgren B, Jensen RV, Tropak M, St-Michel EJ, Redington AN, Botker HE (2012) Exercise-induced cardioprotection is mediated by a bloodborne, transferable factor. Basic Res Cardiol 107:260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-012-0260-x
Nucera S, Biziato D, De Palma M (2011) The interplay between macrophages and angiogenesis in development, tissue injury and regeneration. Int J Dev Biol 55:495–503. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.103227sn
Ong SB, Hernandez-Resendiz S, Crespo-Avilan GE, Mukhametshina RT, Kwek XY, Cabrera-Fuentes HA, Hausenloy DJ (2018) Inflammation following acute myocardial infarction: multiple players, dynamic roles, and novel therapeutic opportunities. Pharmacol Ther 186:73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.01.001
Patel AS, Smith A, Nucera S, Biziato D, Saha P, Attia RQ, Humphries J, Mattock K, Grover SP, Lyons OT, Guidotti LG, Siow R, Ivetic A, Egginton S, Waltham M, Naldini L, De Palma M, Modarai B (2013) TIE2-expressing monocytes/macrophages regulate revascularization of the ischemic limb. EMBO Mol Med 5:858–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/emmm.201302752
Peet C, Ivetic A, Bromage DI, Shah AM (2020) Cardiac monocytes and macrophages after myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res 116:1101–1112. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvz336
Pickard JM, Botker HE, Crimi G, Davidson B, Davidson SM, Dutka D, Ferdinandy P, Ganske R, Garcia-Dorado D, Giricz Z, Gourine AV, Heusch G, Kharbanda R, Kleinbongard P, MacAllister R, McIntyre C, Meybohm P, Prunier F, Redington A, Robertson NJ, Suleiman MS, Vanezis A, Walsh S, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ (2015) Remote ischemic conditioning: from experimental observation to clinical application: report from the 8th Biennial Hatter Cardiovascular Institute Workshop. Basic Res Cardiol 110:453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-014-0453-6
Ravi S, Schuck RN, Hilliard E, Lee CR, Dai X, Lenhart K, Willis MS, Jensen BC, Stouffer GA, Patterson C, Schisler JC (2017) Clinical evidence supports a protective role for CXCL5 in coronary artery disease. Am J Pathol 187:2895–2911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.08.006
Sanz-Nogues C, O’Brien T (2016) In vitro models for assessing therapeutic angiogenesis. Drug Discov Today 21:1495–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2016.05.016
Schmidt MR, Rasmussen ME, Botker HE (2017) Remote ischemic conditioning for patients with STEMI. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 22:302–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074248417702481
Strieter RM, Burdick MD, Gomperts BN, Belperio JA, Keane MP (2005) CXC chemokines in angiogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 16:593–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.04.007
Tsujioka H, Imanishi T, Ikejima H, Kuroi A, Takarada S, Tanimoto T, Kitabata H, Okochi K, Arita Y, Ishibashi K, Komukai K, Kataiwa H, Nakamura N, Hirata K, Tanaka A, Akasaka T (2009) Impact of heterogeneity of human peripheral blood monocyte subsets on myocardial salvage in patients with primary acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.021
van der Laan AM, Hirsch A, Robbers LF, Nijveldt R, Lommerse I, Delewi R, van der Vleuten PA, Biemond BJ, Zwaginga JJ, van der Giessen WJ, Zijlstra F, van Rossum AC, Voermans C, van der Schoot CE, Piek JJ (2012) A proinflammatory monocyte response is associated with myocardial injury and impaired functional outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: monocytes and myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 163:57-65 e52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.002
Weber NC, Riedemann I, Smit KF, Zitta K, van de Vondervoort D, Zuurbier CJ, Hollmann MW, Preckel B, Albrecht M (2015) Plasma from human volunteers subjected to remote ischemic preconditioning protects human endothelial cells from hypoxia-induced cell damage. Basic Res Cardiol 110:17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-015-0474-9
Whittaker P, Przyklenk K (2014) From ischemic conditioning to “hyperconditioning”: clinical phenomenon and basic science opportunity. Dose Response 12:650–663. https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.14-035.Whittaker
Yang J, Balkaya M, Beltran C, Heo JH, Cho S (2019) Remote postischemic conditioning promotes stroke recovery by shifting circulating monocytes to CCR2(+) proinflammatory subset. J Neurosci 39:7778–7789. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2699-18.2019
Yellon DM, Ackbarkhan AK, Balgobin V, Bulluck H, Deelchand A, Dhuny MR, Domah N, Gaoneadry D, Jagessur RK, Joonas N, Kowlessur S, Lutchoo J, Nicholas JM, Pauvaday K, Shamloll O, Walker JM, Hausenloy DJ (2015) Remote ischemic conditioning reduces myocardial infarct size in STEMI patients treated by thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2764–2765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.082
Ziegler-Heitbrock L (2007) The CD14+ CD16+ blood monocytes: their role in infection and inflammation. J Leukoc Biol 81:584–592. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0806510