Effects of probiotic bacteria in dogs with food responsive diarrhoea treated with an elimination diet*

Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition - Tập 90 Số 7-8 - Trang 269-277 - 2006
S.N. Sauter1, Jalil Benyacoub2, Karin Allenspach3, Frédéric Gaschen3, Edgar Ontsouka1, Gloria Reuteler2, C. Cavadini2, Ruth Knorr4, J. W. Blum1
1 Division of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Institute of Animal Genetics, Nutrition and Housing, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland,
2Nestlé Research Centre, Vers-Chez-Les-Blanc, Lausanne, Switzerland
3Clinic for Small Animals, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, and
4Nestlé Research Centre, St Louis, MO, USA

Tóm tắt

SummaryWe evaluated whether a probiotic supplementation in dogs with food responsive diarrhoea (FRD) has beneficial effects on intestinal cytokine patterns and on microbiota. Twenty‐one client‐owned dogs with FRD were presented for clinically needed duodeno‐ and colonoscopy and were enrolled in a prospective placebo (PL)‐controlled probiotic trial. Intestinal tissue samples and faeces were collected during endoscopy. Intestinal mRNA abundance of interleukin (IL)‐5, ‐10, ‐12p40 and ‐13, tumour necrosis factor‐α, transforming growth factor‐β1 and interferon (IFN)‐γ were analysed and numbers of Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Enterococcus spp. and Enterobacteriaceae and supplemented probiotic bacteria were determined in faeces. The Canine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity Index, a scoring system comprising general attitude, appetite, faecal consistency, defecation frequency, and vomitus, decreased in all dogs (p < 0.0001). Duodenal IL‐10 mRNA levels decreased (p = 0.1) and colonic IFN‐γ mRNA levels increased (p = 0.08) after probiotic treatment. Numbers of Enterobacteriaceae decreased in FRD dogs receiving probiotic cocktail (FRDPC) and FRD dogs fed PL (FRDPL) during treatment (p < 0.05), numbers of Lactobacillus spp. increased in FRDPC after when compared with FRDPC before (p < 0.1). One strain of PC was detected in five of eight FRDPC dogs after probiotic supplementation. In conclusion, all dogs clinically improved after treatment, but cytokine patterns were not associated with the clinical features irrespective of the dietary supplementation.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1024/0036-7281.145.5.209

10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.338

Batt R. M., 1982, Role of serum folate and vitamin B12 concentrations in the differentiation of small intestinal abnormalities in the dog, Research in Veterinary Science, 32, 17, 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)32430-5

10.1292/jvms.54.703

10.1093/jn/133.4.1158

10.1093/jn/128.12.2730S

10.1007/BF00294286

10.1080/09629350310001619717

10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200792

10.1159/000081305

Fuller R., 1992, Probiotics – The Scientific Basis, 1, 10.1007/978-94-011-2364-8

10.1016/S0271-5317(01)00354-2

10.1136/gut.2003.037325

10.1093/ajcn/73.2.444s

10.1111/j.1939-1676.2003.tb02450.x

10.1016/S0192-0561(97)00109-4

Knorr R., 2003, Screening and selection of pet probiotics. 2004, Nestlé Purina Nutrition Forum Proceedings: A supplement to Compendium on Continuing Education of Practicing Veterinarian, 26, 68

Lewis L. D., 1990, Small Animal Clinical Nutrition III

10.1016/S0169-328X(01)00095-X

10.1002/1529-0131(200201)46:1<250::AID-ART10064>3.0.CO;2-T

10.1016/S1286-4579(02)01543-5

Ontsouka E. C., 2004, Abundance of mRNA encoding for components of the somatotropic axis and insulin receptor in different layers of jejunum and ileum of neonatal calves, Journal of Animal Science, 82, 1, 10.2527/2004.82113181x

10.1038/nri1499

Sartor R. B., 2005, Probiotic therapy of intestinal inflammation, Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, 21, 44

10.1024/0036-7281.145.11.507

10.1016/j.domaniend.2005.04.006

10.1007/s00248-002-0001-z

10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600663

10.1128/JCM.42.10.4702-4708.2004

10.1053/j.gastro.2004.06.007

Weese J. S., 2002, Preliminary evaluation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG, a potential probiotic in dogs, Canadian Veterinary Journal, 43, 771

10.2460/javma.2002.220.1177